CYTONUCLEAR INTERACTIONS CAN FAVOR THE EVOLUTION OF GENOMIC IMPRINTING

被引:35
|
作者
Wolf, Jason B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Life Sci, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Coadaptation; epistasis; chloroplast; cytoplasm; mitochondria; CYTOCHROME-C-OXIDASE; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA POLYMORPHISM; NUCLEAR-ORGANELLE INTERACTIONS; NATURAL-SELECTION; GENE-EXPRESSION; DROSOPHILA; EPISTASIS; COADAPTATION; ARABIDOPSIS; HAPLOTYPES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00632.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Interactions between cytoplasmic (generally organelle) and nuclear genomes may be relatively common and could potentially have major fitness consequences. As in the case of within-genome epistasis, this cytonuclear epistasis can favor the evolutionary coadaptation of high-fitness combinations of nuclear and cytoplasmic alleles. Because cytoplasmic factors are generally uniparentally inherited, the cytoplasmic genome is inherited along with only one of the nuclear haplotypes, and therefore, coadaptation is expected to evolve through the interaction of these coinherited (usually maternally inherited) genomes. Here I show that, as a result of this coinheritance of the two genomes, cytonuclear epistasis can favor the evolution of genomic imprinting such that, when the cytoplasmic factor is maternally inherited, selection favors maternal expression of the nuclear locus and when the factor is paternally inherited selection favors paternal expression. Genomic imprinting evolves in this model because it leads to a pattern of gene expression in the nuclear haplotype that is coadapted with (i.e., adaptively coordinated with) gene expression in the coinherited cytoplasmic genome.
引用
收藏
页码:1364 / 1371
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Host defenses to transposable elements and the evolution of genomic imprinting
    McDonald, JF
    Matzke, MA
    Matzke, AJ
    CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH, 2005, 110 (1-4) : 242 - 249
  • [42] Rapid Evolution of Genomic Imprinting in Two Species of the Brassicaceae
    Hatorangan, Marcelinus R.
    Laenen, Benjamin
    Steige, Kim A.
    Slotte, Tanja
    Kohler, Claudia
    PLANT CELL, 2016, 28 (08): : 1815 - 1827
  • [43] Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting
    Spencer, H. G.
    Clark, A. G.
    HEREDITY, 2014, 113 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [44] The evolution of genomic imprinting: theories, predictions and empirical tests
    M M Patten
    L Ross
    J P Curley
    D C Queller
    R Bonduriansky
    J B Wolf
    Heredity, 2014, 113 : 119 - 128
  • [45] Coadaptation and conflict, misconception and muddle, in the evolution of genomic imprinting
    Haig, D.
    HEREDITY, 2014, 113 (02) : 96 - 103
  • [46] Genomic imprinting and imprinting defects
    Horsthemke, B.
    MEDIZINISCHE GENETIK, 2010, 22 (04) : 385 - 391
  • [47] The conflict theory of genomic imprinting: How much can be explained?
    Iwasa, Y
    CURRENT TOPICS IN DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, VOL 40, 1998, 40 : 255 - 293
  • [48] Cytonuclear genomic dissociation in African elephant species
    Roca, AL
    Georgiadis, N
    O'Brien, SJ
    NATURE GENETICS, 2005, 37 (01) : 96 - 100
  • [49] GENOMIC IMPRINTING
    MONK, M
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1988, 2 (08) : 921 - 925
  • [50] Genomic imprinting
    Hall, Judith G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 1 (01) : 34 - 39