When does word frequency influence written production?

被引:35
|
作者
Baus, Cristina [1 ]
Strijkers, Kristof [2 ]
Costa, Albert [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Ctr Brain & Cognit, Barcelona 08018, Spain
[2] Univ Aix Marseille, CNRS, Lab Psychol Cognit, Marseille, France
[3] Inst Catalana Recerca & Estudis Avancats, Barcelona, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2013年 / 4卷
关键词
written word production; typewriting; central and peripheral processes; lexical frequency; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; TIME-COURSE; SPEECH PRODUCTION; LEXICAL ACCESS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; BRAIN POTENTIALS; SET SIZE; PICTURES; ERP; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00963
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to explore the central (e.g., lexical processing) and peripheral processes (motor preparation and execution) underlying word production during typewriting. To do so, we tested non-professional typers in a picture typing task while continuously recording EEG. Participants were instructed to write (by means of a standard keyboard) the corresponding name for a given picture. The lexical frequency of the words was manipulated: half of the picture names were of high-frequency while the remaining were of low-frequency. Different measures were obtained: (1) first keystroke latency and (2) keystroke latency of the subsequent letters and duration of the word. Moreover, ERPs locked to the onset of the picture presentation were analyzed to explore the temporal course of word frequency in typewriting. The results showed an effect of word frequency for the first keystroke latency but not for the duration of the word or the speed to which letter were typed (interstroke intervals). The electrophysiological results showed the expected ERP frequency effect at posterior sites: amplitudes for low-frequency words were more positive than those for high-frequency words. However, relative to previous evidence in the spoken modality, the frequency effect appeared in a later time-window. These results demonstrate two marked differences in the processing dynamics underpinning typing compared to speaking: First, central processing dynamics between speaking and typing differ already in the manner that words are accessed; second, central processing differences in typing, unlike speaking, do not cascade to peripheral processes involved in response execution.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] WINGS OF THE WRITTEN WORD: AN EXPERIENCE OF PUBLICATION IN SITUATION OF PRODUCTION OF WRITTEN EXPLANATORY TEXTS
    Andrade, Ender
    LEGENDA, 2014, 18 (18): : 280 - 282
  • [22] Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production
    Hartsuiker, RJ
    Westenberg, C
    COGNITION, 2000, 75 (02) : B27 - B39
  • [23] Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison
    Lete, Bernard
    Bonin, Patrick
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (05): : 973 - 1000
  • [24] A study on the construct validity of the word frequency dictionary of written Turkish
    Tekcan, AI
    Göz, I
    Yalçin, S
    Akirmak, Ü
    Serbest, S
    Firat, C
    Rodoplu, S
    TURK PSIKOLOJI DERGISI, 2002, 17 (50): : 27 - 45
  • [25] The Written Word
    McDonald, Gerald D.
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1949, 74 (05) : 380 - 380
  • [26] WRITTEN WORD
    FRANCKE, DE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1979, 36 (04): : 455 - 455
  • [27] The written word
    Manfredi Sanchez, Juan Luis
    IC-REVISTA CIENTIFICA DE INFORMACION Y COMUNICACION, 2011, (08): : 148 - 150
  • [28] THE WRITTEN WORD
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1948, 38 (04) : 554 - 555
  • [29] WRITTEN WORD
    不详
    MEDICINE SCIENCE AND THE LAW, 1968, 8 (04) : 223 - 226
  • [30] THE 'WRITTEN WORD'
    KELLAWAY, F
    OVERLAND, 1988, (110): : 43 - 43