The science of phylogenetic systematics: Explanation, prediction, and test

被引:0
|
作者
Kluge, AG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Museum Zool, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/clad.1999.0123
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
When the concept of homology is operationalized with synapomorphy and tested with character congruence, homology and homoplasy are treated as a complement relation, a and not-a, respectively. This leaves homoplasy to be defined nominally, something like operational "error" in the inference of homology. In choosing the most severely tested and least disconfirmed cladogram, those errors are minimized, and the power of that cladogram to explain synapomorphies, as inherited from the same common ancestral condition, is correspondingly maximized. Tests of predictions of homoplasy can lead to the elimination of those kinds of error. The complementary relationship between homology and homoplasy is considered one of reciprocal clarification, not epistemological dependence, (C) 1999 The Willi Hennig Society.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 436
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EXPLANATION AND PREDICTION IN VEGETATION SCIENCE
    WIEGLEB, G
    [J]. VEGETATIO, 1989, 83 (1-2): : 17 - 34
  • [2] Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science
    Cleland, Carol E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2011, 62 (03): : 551 - 582
  • [3] PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS
    HENNIG, W
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1965, 10 : 97 - &
  • [4] Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science
    Hofman, Jake M.
    Watts, Duncan J.
    Athey, Susan
    Garip, Filiz
    Griffiths, Thomas L.
    Kleinberg, Jon
    Margetts, Helen
    Mullainathan, Sendhil
    Salganik, Matthew J.
    Vazire, Simine
    Vespignani, Alessandro
    Yarkoni, Tal
    [J]. NATURE, 2021, 595 (7866) : 181 - 188
  • [5] Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science
    Jake M. Hofman
    Duncan J. Watts
    Susan Athey
    Filiz Garip
    Thomas L. Griffiths
    Jon Kleinberg
    Helen Margetts
    Sendhil Mullainathan
    Matthew J. Salganik
    Simine Vazire
    Alessandro Vespignani
    Tal Yarkoni
    [J]. Nature, 2021, 595 : 181 - 188
  • [6] Scientific explanation and systematics
    de Santis, Marcelo Domingos
    [J]. SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY, 2021, 19 (03) : 312 - 321
  • [7] PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS IN BOTANY
    BREMER, K
    WANNTORP, HE
    [J]. TAXON, 1978, 27 (04) : 317 - 329
  • [8] On the other "phylogenetic systematics"
    Nixon, KC
    Carpenter, JM
    [J]. CLADISTICS, 2000, 16 (03) : 298 - 318
  • [9] PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS FOR PHYCOLOGY
    THERIOT, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 1989, 25 (03) : 407 - 411
  • [10] The Evolution of Phylogenetic Systematics
    Winsor, Mary P.
    [J]. ISIS, 2015, 106 (04) : 982 - 983