Comparison between laboratory measurements, simulations, and analytical predictions of the transverse wall impedance at low frequencies

被引:11
|
作者
Roncarolo, F. [1 ,2 ]
Caspers, F. [3 ]
Kroyer, T. [3 ]
Metral, E. [3 ]
Mounet, N. [3 ,4 ]
Salvant, B. [3 ,4 ]
Zotter, B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Phys & Astron, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Cockcroft Inst, Warrington WA4 4AD, Cheshire, England
[3] CERN, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
ACCELERATORS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.084401
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
The prediction of the transverse wall beam impedance at the first unstable betatron line (8 kHz) of the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is of paramount importance for understanding and controlling the related coupled-bunch instabilities. Until now only novel analytical formulas were available at this frequency. Recently, laboratory measurements and numerical simulations were performed to cross-check the analytical predictions. The experimental results based on the measurement of the variation of a probe coil inductance in the presence of (i) sample graphite plates, (ii) stand-alone LHC collimator jaws, and (iii) a full LHC collimator assembly are presented in detail. The measurement results are compared to both analytical theories and simulations. In addition, the consequences for the understanding of the LHC impedance are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between analytical and numerical predictions for the linearly viscoelastic behavior of textile composites
    El Mourid, Amine
    Ganesan, Rajamohan
    Levesque, Martin
    [J]. MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 2013, 58 : 69 - 83
  • [42] Analytical and numerical calculations of resistive wall impedances for thin beam pipe structures at low frequencies
    Niedermayer, U.
    Boine-Frankenheim, O.
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2012, 687 : 51 - 61
  • [43] Comparison Between Measurements and Simulations of Conventional and Distributed MIMO System
    Ibernon-Fernandez, Ruben
    Molina-Garcia-Pardo, Jose-Maria
    Juan-Llacer, Leandro
    [J]. IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, 2008, 7 : 546 - 549
  • [44] Comparison between thermal simulations and measurements of an existing detached house
    Iguchi M.
    Hachisu H.
    Sakamoto Y.
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering (Japan), 2019, 84 (764): : 947 - 954
  • [45] Comparison between SPARC e-meter measurements and simulations
    Ronsivalle, C.
    Giannessi, L.
    Quattromini, M.
    Bacci, A.
    Rossi, A. R.
    Serafina, L.
    Boscolo, M.
    Chiadroni, E.
    Ferrario, M.
    Filippetto, D.
    Fusco, V.
    Gatti, G.
    Migliorati, M.
    Mostacci, A.
    Vaccarezza, C.
    Vicario, C.
    Cianchi, A.
    Petrarca, M.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE PARTICLE ACCELERATOR CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-11, 2007, : 3185 - +
  • [46] A comparison between analytical and numerical simulations of solutions of the coupled Boussinesq equations
    Mohapatra, S. C.
    Fonseca, R. B.
    Guedes Soares, C.
    [J]. MARITIME TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING 3, VOLS 1-2, 2016, : 1175 - 1180
  • [47] Comparison of serum cytokine ELISA measurements between laboratory sites
    Wolfe, Anthony
    Brown, Shyretha
    Ungaro, Corey
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34
  • [48] Comparison between laboratory and airborne BRDF measurements for remote sensing
    Georgiev, Georgi T.
    Gatebe, Charles K.
    Butler, James J.
    King, Michael D.
    [J]. EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XI, 2006, 6296
  • [49] Comparison between electrochemical and optoelectrochemical impedance measurements for detection of DNA hybridization
    Souteyrand, E
    Chen, C
    Cloarec, JP
    Nesme, X
    Simonet, P
    Navarro, I
    Martin, JR
    [J]. APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 89 (2-3) : 195 - 207
  • [50] Comparison between electrochemical and optoelectrochemical impedance measurements for detection of DNA hybridization
    E. Souteyrand
    C. Chen
    J. P. Cloarec
    X. Nesme
    P. Simonet
    I. Navarro
    J. R. Martin
    [J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2000, 89 : 195 - 207