Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses - a simulation study

被引:11
|
作者
Fragomeni, B. O. [1 ]
Lourenco, D. A. L. [1 ]
Tsuruta, S. [1 ]
Masuda, Y. [1 ]
Aguilar, I. [2 ]
Misztal, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Inst Nacl Invest Agr, Canelones, Uruguay
关键词
Genetic evaluation; genomic selection; single-step method; FULL PEDIGREE; MODEL; PREDICTIONS; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; COMPUTE; INVERSE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12161
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine accuracy of genomic selection via single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) when the direct inverse of the genomic relationship matrix (G) is replaced by an approximation of G(-1) based on recursions for young genotyped animals conditioned on a subset of proven animals, termed algorithm for proven and young animals (APY). With the efficient implementation, this algorithm has a cubic cost with proven animals and linear with young animals. Ten duplicate data sets mimicking a dairy cattle population were simulated. In a first scenario, genomic information for 20k genotyped bulls, divided in 7k proven and 13k young bulls, was generated for each replicate. In a second scenario, 5k genotyped cows with phenotypes were included in the analysis as young animals. Accuracies (average for the 10 replicates) in regular EBV were 0.72 and 0.34 for proven and young animals, respectively. When genomic information was included, they increased to 0.75 and 0.50. No differences between genomic EBV (GEBV) obtained with the regular G(-1) and the approximated G(-1) via the recursive method were observed. In the second scenario, accuracies in GEBV (0.76, 0.51 and 0.59 for proven bulls, young males and young females, respectively) were also higher than those in EBV (0.72, 0.35 and 0.49). Again, no differences between GEBV with regular G(-1) and with recursions were observed. With the recursive algorithm, the number of iterations to achieve convergence was reduced from 227 to 206 in the first scenario and from 232 to 209 in the second scenario. Cows can be treated as young animals in APY without reducing the accuracy. The proposed algorithm can be implemented to reduce computing costs and to overcome current limitations on the number of genotyped animals in the ssGBLUP method.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 345
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genomic predictions for crossbred animals with single-step genomic BLUP
    Pena, D. Gonzalez
    Vukasinovic, N.
    Brooker, J.
    Przybyla, C.
    Steyn, Y.
    De-Nise, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 : 267 - 267
  • [2] Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data
    Pocrnic, Ivan
    Lourenco, Daniela A. L.
    Chen, Ching-Yi
    Herring, William O.
    Misztal, Ignacy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 (04) : 1513 - 1522
  • [3] Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes
    Fragomeni, B. O.
    Lourenco, D. A. L.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Masuda, Y.
    Aguilar, I.
    Legarra, A.
    Lawlor, T. J.
    Misztal, I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (06) : 4090 - 4094
  • [4] Strategies for choosing core animals in the algorithm for proven and young and their impact on the accuracy of single-step genomic in cattle
    Cesarani, A.
    Bermann, M.
    Dimauro, C.
    Degano, L.
    Vicario, D.
    Lourenco, D.
    Macciotta, N. P. P.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2023, 17 (04)
  • [5] Automatic scaling in single-step genomic BLUP
    Bermann, M.
    Lourenco, D.
    Misztal, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (02) : 2027 - 2031
  • [6] Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders
    Kudinov, Andrei A.
    Koivula, Minna
    Aamand, Gert P.
    Stranden, Ismo
    Mantysaari, Esa A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [7] Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP
    Bradford, H. L.
    Masuda, Y.
    VanRaden, P. M.
    Legarra, A.
    Misztal, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (03) : 2336 - 2346
  • [8] Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes
    Vandenplas, Jeremie
    Calus, Mario P. L.
    ten Napel, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (06) : 2060 - 2073
  • [9] Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals
    Ibrahim Jibrila
    Jan ten Napel
    Jeremie Vandenplas
    Roel F. Veerkamp
    Mario P. L. Calus
    [J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 52
  • [10] Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals
    Jibrila, Ibrahim
    ten Napel, Jan
    Vandenplas, Jeremie
    Veerkamp, Roel F.
    Calus, Mario P. L.
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2020, 52 (01)