Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes

被引:12
|
作者
Vandenplas, Jeremie [1 ]
Calus, Mario P. L. [1 ]
ten Napel, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen UR Livestock Res, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
APY; genomic evaluation; single-step; LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR; RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; GENETIC EVALUATION; GENOTYPED ANIMALS; LARGE NUMBER; SELECTION; INFORMATION; DIMENSIONALITY; IMPLEMENTATION; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1093/jas/sky136
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) efficiently computes an approximated inverse of the genomic relationship matrix, by dividing genotyped animals in the so-called core and noncore animals. The APY leads to computationally feasible single-step genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (ssGBLUP) with a large number of genotyped animals and was successfully applied to real single-breed or line datasets. This study aimed to assess the quality of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) when using the APY (GEBV(APY)), in comparison to GEBV when using the directly inverted genomic relationship matrix (GEBV(DIRECT)), for situations based on crossbreeding schemes, including F1 and F2 crosses, such as the ones for pigs and chickens. Based on simulations of a 3-way crossbreeding program, we compared different approximated inverses of a genomic relationship matrix, by varying the size and the composition of the core group. We showed that GEBV(APY) were accurate approximations of GEBV(DIRECT) for multivariate ssGBLUP involving different breeds and their crosses. GEBV(APY) as accurate as GEBV(DIRECT) were obtained when the core groups included animals from different breed compositions and when the core groups had a size between the numbers of the largest eigenvalues explaining 98% and 99% of the variation in the raw genomic relationship matrix.
引用
收藏
页码:2060 / 2073
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automatic scaling in single-step genomic BLUP
    Bermann, M.
    Lourenco, D.
    Misztal, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (02) : 2027 - 2031
  • [2] Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders
    Kudinov, Andrei A.
    Koivula, Minna
    Aamand, Gert P.
    Stranden, Ismo
    Mantysaari, Esa A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [3] Genomic predictions for crossbred animals with single-step genomic BLUP
    Pena, D. Gonzalez
    Vukasinovic, N.
    Brooker, J.
    Przybyla, C.
    Steyn, Y.
    De-Nise, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 : 267 - 267
  • [4] Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP
    Bradford, H. L.
    Masuda, Y.
    VanRaden, P. M.
    Legarra, A.
    Misztal, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (03) : 2336 - 2346
  • [5] Effect of Blending and Tuning Relationship Matrices in Single-step Genomic BLUP
    McWhorter, Taylor M.
    Garcia, Andre
    Bermann, Matias
    Legarra, Andres
    Aguilar, Ignacio
    Misztal, Ignacy
    Lourenco, Daniela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 19 - 19
  • [6] Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs
    Tage Ostersen
    Ole F. Christensen
    Per Madsen
    Mark Henryon
    [J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 48
  • [7] Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs
    Ostersen, Tage
    Christensen, Ole F.
    Madsen, Per
    Henryon, Mark
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2016, 48
  • [8] Single-step genomic BLUP with genetic groups and automatic adjustment for allele coding
    Stranden, Ismo
    Aamand, Gert P.
    Mantysaari, Esa A.
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2022, 54 (01)
  • [9] Single-step genomic BLUP with genetic groups and automatic adjustment for allele coding
    Ismo Strandén
    Gert P. Aamand
    Esa A. Mäntysaari
    [J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 54
  • [10] Genomic prediction with single-step genomic BLUP using a subset of genotypes in US Holstein.
    Masuda, Y.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Misztal, I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 : 141 - 141