Surface imperfection and wringing thickness in uncertainty estimation of end standards calibration

被引:2
|
作者
Ali, Salah H. R. [1 ]
Naeim, Ihab H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand, Engn & Surface Metrol Dept, Div Precis Engn, Giza 12211136, Egypt
[2] Natl Inst Stand, End & Line Stand Metrol Dept, Div Precis Engn, Giza 12211136, Egypt
[3] Taibah Univ, Tayba, Medina, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Uncertainty; End standards; Interferometry; Optomechanical; GAUGE BLOCKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.03.012
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Empirical estimation of uncertainty in dimensional metrology is a vital part in calibration processes. Uncertainty estimation in gauge block measurement mainly depends on three major areas, thermal effects, dimension metrology system that includes measurement strategy, and end standard surface perfection grades. This paper focuses precisely to estimate the uncertainty due to the geometrical imperfection of measuring surfaces and wringing thickness U(L-g+L-w) in calibration of end standards grade 0. An optomechanical system equipped with Zygo interferometer and AFM techniques have been employed. A novel protocol of measurement covering the geometric form of end standard surfaces and wrung base platen was experimentally applied. Surface imperfection characteristics of commonly used 6.5 mm GB have been achieved by AFM in 2D and 3D to be applied in three sets of experiments. The results show that there are obvious mapping relations between geometrical imperfection and wringing thickness of the end standards calibration. Moreover, the predicted uncertainties are clearly estimated within an acceptable range from 0.132 to 0.202 mu m respectively. Experimental and analytical results are also presented and discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Numerical simulation for the determination of the measurement uncertainty for the calibration of mass standards by transfer artefacts
    Lehrmann, Katharina
    Haertig, Frank
    Tutsch, Rainer
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2021, 88 (02) : 90 - 102
  • [42] Model based estimation of uncertainty for shock calibration of accelerometers.
    Knapp, J
    Niemann, J
    Subaric-Leitis, A
    MATERIALPRUFUNG, 2002, 44 (1-2): : 19 - 24
  • [43] Virtual Calibration Environment for A-Priori Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty
    Gugg, Christoph
    Harker, Matthew
    O'Leary, Paul
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS FOR MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (CIVEMSA), 2014, : 52 - 57
  • [44] Generic error model for calibration and uncertainty estimation of hydrological models
    Goetzinger, Jens
    Bardossy, Andras
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44
  • [45] Uncertainty estimation in calibration of instruments of model turbine test facility
    Goyal, Rahul
    FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION, 2021, 79
  • [46] Radiometric calibration transfer chain from primary standards to the end-to-end Hyperion sensor
    Jarecke, P
    Yokoyama, K
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS V, 2000, 4135 : 254 - 263
  • [47] Sensitivity Analysis of S-Parameter Measurements Due to Calibration Standards Uncertainty
    Lenk, Friedrich
    Doerner, Ralf
    Rumiantsev, Andrej
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2013, 61 (10) : 3800 - 3807
  • [48] Intermediate Tasks Enhanced End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Uncertainty Estimation
    Huang, Xuean
    Su, Jianmei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 27 TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN, CSCWD 2024, 2024, : 133 - 138
  • [49] Theoretical Investigation of the Influence of Surface Imperfection and Thin Film Thickness on the Critical Temperatures of Ferroelectric Transition
    El-Frikhe, Es-Said
    Toumanari, Ahmed
    Khatib, Driss
    FERROELECTRICS, 2008, 372 : 16 - 21
  • [50] Uncertainty analysis for watershed modeling using generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation with multiple calibration measures
    Jia, Yanbing
    Culver, Teresa B.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2008, 134 (02): : 97 - 106