Weekly topotecan as second- or third-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer

被引:14
|
作者
Coronel, Jaime [2 ]
Cetina, Lucely [2 ]
Candelaria, Myrna [2 ]
Gonzalez-Fierro, Aurora [2 ]
Arias, Daimy [2 ]
Cantu, David [3 ]
Duenas-Gonzalez, Alfonso [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Unidad Invest Biomed Canc, Direcc Invest, Mexico City 14080, DF, Mexico
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol INCan, Div Clin Res, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Inst Nacl Cancerol INCan, Dept Gynecol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Unit Biomed Res Canc, Inst Invest Biomed, INCan, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
关键词
Topotecan; Cervical cancer; Chemotherapy resistant; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PHASE-II; OVARIAN-CANCER; PACLITAXEL; CISPLATIN;
D O I
10.1007/s12032-008-9108-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Topotecan is active in advanced or metastatic cervical cancer even in patients who have received prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy, although hematologic toxicity has limited its use. Studies in cervical cancer have utilized topotecan administered on days 1-5 of each 21- or 28-day cycle. Alternative schedules, such as weekly schemes, have proven to ameliorate hematological toxicity. The objective of this study was to analyze the results of weekly topotecan as second- or third-line therapy in advanced or metastatic cervical cancer. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed cervical carcinoma, measurable disease, and at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Topotecan was administered at a dose of 3 mg/m(2) (maximum, 5 mg per dose) diluted in 250 ml of normal saline in a 30-min infusion weekly for every 28 days. We assessed response and toxicity. Twenty-two patients entered this study. Eighteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Patients received a mean 3.5 courses (range, 1-6 courses). No complete or partial responses were observed; five (27.7%) patients exhibited disease stabilization as maximum response (two in irradiated sites, and three in lung/mediastinum). Median progression-free interval was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.75-4 months) and median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI: 6-8.7 months). Weekly topotecan administration achieved disease stabilization in 27.7% of heavily pre-treated patients. The achievement could be of worth in this setting in which disease prolongation is desirable.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 214
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Applicability of a Predictive Index for Second- and Third-Line Treatment of Unselected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients
    Wojas-Krawczyk, Kamila
    Krawczyk, Pawel
    Mlak, Radoslaw
    Kucharczyk, Tomasz
    Kowalski, Dariusz M.
    Krzakowski, Maciej
    Milanowski, Janusz
    RESPIRATION, 2011, 82 (04) : 341 - 350
  • [32] Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Strategies for Third-Line Treatment
    Marshall, John L.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [33] Weekly topotecan and biweekly bevacizumab in recurrent and progressive ovarian carcinoma: A single institution experience for third-line or greater treatment.
    Grzankowski, Kassondra S.
    Lele, Shashikant B.
    Pietkiewicz, John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [34] Second- and third-line treatments in non-small cell lung cancer
    Kumar A.
    Wakelee H.
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2006, 7 (1) : 37 - 49
  • [35] Second- and third-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Feasibility and potential benefits in a retrospective series of 117 patients
    Bachet, J. -B.
    Mitry, E.
    Lievre, A.
    Lepere, C.
    Vaillant, J. -N.
    Declety, G.
    Parlier, H.
    Emile, J. -F.
    Julie, C.
    Rougier, P.
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2009, 33 (10-11): : 1036 - 1044
  • [36] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR SURVIVAL IN THIRD-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT AND METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
    Gomez Rangel, J. D.
    Gonzalez Avila, G.
    Silva, J. A.
    Perez, M.
    Rivera Rivera, S.
    Villalobos Valencia, R.
    Candelario Sedano, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 117 - 117
  • [37] Optimizing the Treatment Sequence From Second-Line to Third-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Discussion
    Grothey, Axel
    Prager, Gerald W.
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01) : 21 - 23
  • [38] THIRD-LINE FOLFIRI IN METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS
    Caparello, C.
    Vasile, E.
    Lencioni, M.
    Fabrini, M. G.
    Lucchesi, M.
    Ginocchi, L.
    Caponi, S.
    Santi, S.
    Ricci, S.
    Falcone, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 251 - 251
  • [39] Everolimus as second- or third-line treatment of advanced endometrial cancer: ENDORAD, a phase II trial of GINECO
    I Ray-Coquard
    L Favier
    B Weber
    C Roemer-Becuwe
    P Bougnoux
    M Fabbro
    A Floquet
    F Joly
    A Plantade
    D Paraiso
    E Pujade-Lauraine
    British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108 : 1771 - 1777
  • [40] Economic impact of second- and third-line erlotinib treatment of non small-cell lung cancer
    Chouaid, C.
    Moser, A.
    Coudray-Omnes, C.
    Vergnenegre, A.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2008, 25 (09) : 1096 - 1103