Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?

被引:330
|
作者
Farah, MJ
Illes, J
Cook-Deegan, R
Gardner, H
Kandel, E
King, P
Parens, E
Sahakian, B
Wolpe, PR
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Ctr Biomed Eth, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Inst Genome Sci & Policy, Ctr Genome Eth Law & Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Publ Policy Studies, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Ctr Neurobiol & Behav, New York, NY 10032 USA
[8] Howard Hughes Med Inst, New York, NY 10032 USA
[9] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Law, Washington, DC 20001 USA
[10] Hastings Ctr, Garrison, NY 10524 USA
[11] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[12] Univ Penn, Ctr Bioeth, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[13] Univ Penn, Ctr Bioeth, Dept Med Eth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[14] Univ Penn, Ctr Bioeth, Dept Sociol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nrn1390
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Our growing ability to alter brain function can be used to enhance the mental processes of normal individuals as well as to treat mental dysfunction in people who are ill. The prospect of neurocognitive enhancement raises many issues about what is safe, fair and otherwise morally acceptable. This article resulted from a meeting on neurocognitive enhancement that was held by the authors. Our goal is to review the state of the art in neurocognitive enhancement, its attendant social and ethical problems, and the ways in which society can address these problems.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 425
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条