Relapse Rates in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Switching from Interferon to Fingolimod or Glatiramer Acetate: A US Claims Database Study

被引:65
|
作者
Bergvall, Niklas [1 ]
Makin, Charles [2 ]
Lahoz, Raquel [1 ]
Agashivala, Neetu [3 ]
Pradhan, Ashish [3 ]
Capkun, Gorana [1 ]
Petrilla, Allison A. [2 ]
Karkare, Swapna U. [2 ]
McGuiness, Catherine Balderston [2 ]
Korn, Jonathan R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
[2] IMS Hlth, Plymouth Meeting, PA USA
[3] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
DISEASE-MODIFYING THERAPIES; INTRAMUSCULAR INTERFERON; CLINICAL-COURSE; DOUBLE-BLIND; MULTICENTER; TOLERABILITY; DISABILITY; ADHERENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0088472
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Approximately one-third of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are unresponsive to, or intolerant of, interferon (IFN) therapy, prompting a switch to other disease-modifying therapies. Clinical outcomes of switching therapy are unknown. This retrospective study assessed differences in relapse rates among patients with MS switching from IFN to fingolimod or glatiramer acetate (GA) in a real-world setting. Methods: US administrative claims data from the PharMetrics Plus (TM) database were used to identify patients with MS who switched from IFN to fingolimod or GA between October 1, 2010 and March 31, 2012. Patients were matched 1: 1 using propensity scores within strata (number of pre-index relapses) on demographic (e. g. age and gender) and disease (e. g. timing of pre-index relapse, comorbidities and symptoms) characteristics. A claims-based algorithm was used to identify relapses while patients were persistent with therapy over 360 days post-switch. Differences in both the probability of experiencing a relapse and the annualized relapse rate (ARR) while persistent with therapy were assessed. Results: The matched sample population contained 264 patients (n = 132 in each cohort). Before switching, 33.3% of patients in both cohorts had experienced at least one relapse. During the post-index persistence period, the proportion of patients with at least one relapse was lower in the fingolimod cohort (12.9%) than in the GA cohort (25.0%), and ARRs were lower with fingolimod (0.19) than with GA (0.51). Patients treated with fingolimod had a 59% lower probability of relapse (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.80; p = 0.0091) and 62% fewer relapses per year (rate ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.68; p = 0.0013) compared with those treated with GA. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, patients with MS who switched from IFNs to fingolimod were significantly less likely to experience relapses than those who switched to GA.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Insights from the Coptimize study: characteristics of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients switching to glatiramer acetate
    Ziemssen, T.
    Carra, A.
    De Klippel, N.
    de Sa, J.
    Frederiken, J.
    Heinzlef, O.
    Karageorgiou, C.
    Kovacs, K.
    Landtblom, A.
    Lisy, L.
    Bajenaru, O.
    Tsai, C.
    Tubridy, N.
    Vorobeychik, G.
    Macias, M.
    Edland, A.
    Lander, R.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2011, 17 : S218 - S218
  • [32] Why are eligible patients with multiple sclerosis not using interferon-β or glatiramer acetate?
    Vollmer, TL
    Hadjimichael, O
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1999, 46 (03) : 458 - 458
  • [33] Comparison of fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate as second-line therapy in active multiple sclerosis
    He, A.
    Spelman, T.
    Jokubaitis, V.
    Lugaresi, A.
    Izquierdo, G.
    Trojano, M.
    Grammond, P.
    Lechner-Scott, J.
    Duquette, P.
    Girard, M.
    Pucci, E.
    Slee, M.
    Grand'Maison, F.
    Oreja-Guevara, C.
    Boz, C.
    Fernandez-Bolanos, R.
    Hodgkinson, S.
    Sanchez-Menoyo, J.
    Iuliano, G.
    Barnett, M.
    Moore, F.
    Butzkueven, H.
    Kalincik, T.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 : 193 - 193
  • [34] Treatment Patterns And Reasons For Switching Among Us Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Taking The Glatiramer Acetate Class Of Products
    Alexander, J.
    Kasturi, J.
    Melamed-Gal, S.
    Ariely, R.
    Carroll, B.
    Su, Z.
    Bryant, A.
    Schobel, V.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (1_SUPPL) : 51 - 51
  • [35] Tolerability and Acceptance of Switching from Brand to Generic Glatiramer Acetate in Multiple Sclerosis
    Maraffi, Isabella
    Mallucci, Giulia
    Disanto, Giulio
    Sacco, Rosaria
    Tiberti, Massimiliano
    Gobbi, Claudio
    Zecca, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (10)
  • [36] Adherence to treatment with fingolimod after switching from interferon beta among patients with multiple sclerosis
    Golan, D.
    Levy, S.
    Miller, A.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2015, 21 : 708 - 708
  • [37] Real-world durability of relapse rate reduction in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving fingolimod for up to 3 years: a retrospective US claims database analysis
    Fox, Edward
    Vieira, Maria Cecilia
    Johnson, Kristen
    Peeples, Miranda
    Bensimon, Arielle G.
    Signorovitch, James
    Herrera, Vivian
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 398 : 163 - 170
  • [38] Glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1b: a study of outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis
    Jane Castelli-Haley
    MerriKay A. Oleen-Burkey
    Maureen J. Lage
    Kenneth P. Johnson
    Advances in Therapy, 2009, 26 : 552 - 562
  • [39] Glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1b: a study of outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis
    Castelli-Haley, Jane
    Oleen-Burkey, MerriKay A.
    Lage, Maureen J.
    Johnson, Kenneth P.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2009, 26 (05) : 552 - 562
  • [40] Comparison of Switch to Fingolimod or Interferon Beta/Glatiramer Acetate in Active Multiple Sclerosis (vol 72, pg 405, 2015)
    He, A.
    Spelman, T.
    Jokubaitis, V
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2015, 72 (08) : 950 - 950