Five-factor model of personality disorders: Spanish normative data and validation

被引:2
|
作者
Colodro, Joaquin [1 ]
Lopez-Garcia, Juan J. [1 ]
Mezquita, Laura [2 ]
Colodro-Conde, Lucia [1 ,3 ]
Ibanez, Manuel I. [2 ,4 ]
Edo, Silvia [2 ,5 ]
Villa, Elena [2 ]
Ortet, Generos [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Murcia, Spain
[2] Univ Jaume 1, Castellon De La Plana, Spain
[3] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Salud Mental CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
[5] Hosp Prov Castellon, Hosp Dia, Castellon De La Plana, Spain
来源
ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA | 2018年 / 34卷 / 02期
关键词
FFM; personality disorder; NEO PI-R; Spanish normative data; construct validity; DSM-IV-TR; DIMENSIONAL MODELS; MALADAPTIVE VARIANTS; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; CLASSIFICATION; REPRESENT; VALIDITY; TRAITS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.6018/analesps.34.2.289271
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The categorical approach of personality disorders (PD) has given way to a dimensional paradigm. Within this, the Five-factor model (FFM) proposes theoretical hypotheses describing personality pathologies and PD empirical prototypes based on the DSM (DSM-PD). Moreover, a methodology to score DSM-PD using the NEO PI-R facets was developed. In this ex post-facto study FFM-PD count norms were developed using data from the NEO PI-R Spanish adaptation. Furthermore, the diagnostic agreement with the IPDE and validity of FFM-PD counts was analyzed in a clinical (n = 222) and non-clinical sample (n = 742). Based on NEO PI-R scores, we presented Spanish FFM-PD normative data. FFM-PD benchmarks were highly likely to be exceeded if subjects were classified as a subclinical case in the DSM-PD. Convergent correlations of FFM-PD counts with their equivalent subclinical cases of DSM-PD were statistically significant and outperformed any divergent correlation as well as the average divergent correlations in all FFM-PD. The use of a count technique based on NEO PI-R facets and Spanish FFM-PD normative data facilitate PD understanding and interpretation in various applied psychology fields.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 273
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rigid and extreme: A geometric representation of personality disorders in five-factor model space
    O'Connor, BP
    Dyce, JA
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (06) : 1119 - 1130
  • [42] Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model among French speakers in Africa and Europe
    Rossier, Jerome
    Rigozzi, Christine
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2008, 53 (08): : 534 - 544
  • [43] The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples
    Miller, JD
    Reynolds, SK
    Pilkonis, PA
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2004, 16 (03) : 310 - 322
  • [44] Perfectionism Dimensions and the Five-factor Model of Personality
    Dunkley, David M.
    Blankstein, Kirk R.
    Berg, Jody-Lynn
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2012, 26 (03) : 233 - 244
  • [45] Personality, blood type, and the five-factor model
    Cramer, KM
    Imaike, E
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2002, 32 (04) : 621 - 626
  • [46] Anxiety sensitivity and the five-factor model of personality
    Cox, BJ
    Borger, SC
    Taylor, S
    Fuentes, K
    Ross, LM
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1999, 37 (07) : 633 - 641
  • [47] Pathological gambling and the five-factor model of personality
    Bagby, R. Michael
    Vachon, David D.
    Bulmash, Eric L.
    Toneatto, Tony
    Quilty, Lena C.
    Costa, Paul T.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 43 (04) : 873 - 880
  • [48] Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership
    Judge, TA
    Bono, JE
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (05) : 751 - 765
  • [49] Personality disorders and the five-factor model: A test of facet-level predictions
    Dyce, JA
    O'Connor, BP
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1998, 12 (01) : 31 - 45
  • [50] Five-factor model of personality and employee absence
    Judge, TA
    Martocchio, JJ
    Thoresen, CJ
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (05) : 745 - 755