Effect of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infection on Post-transplant Outcomes

被引:60
|
作者
Schulman, Allison R. [1 ]
Martens, Timothy P. [1 ]
Russo, Mark J. [1 ]
Christos, Paul J. [2 ]
Gordon, Rachel J. [1 ]
Lowy, Franklin D. [1 ]
Oz, Mehmet C. [1 ]
Naka, Yoshifumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiothorac Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Publ Hlth, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
关键词
IMPLANTATION; SUPPORT; HYPOGAMMAGLOBULINEMIA; TRANSPLANTATION; PREVENTION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURFACE; BRIDGE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2008.12.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: in this study, we sought to confirm which types of device-related infections impact bridge-to-transplant rates. We also aimed to determine the effect of device-related infections on post-transplant survival and post-transplant infection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed paper and electronic medical records for 149 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to transplantation at the Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center between 2000 and 2006. The primary outcome measures were survival to transplantation, post-transplant infection and post-transplant survival. Results: Patients with sepsis were less likely to be successfully bridged to cardiac transplantation (7 of 22 vs 103 of 127, 31.8% vs 81.1%, p = 0.01). However, if transplanted, their survival rates at 1 year were not decreased (6 of 7 vs 85 of 103, 85.7% vs 82.5%, p = 1.00). No other pre-transplant device-related infection affected post-transplant survival at 1 year (22 of 27 vs 69 of 83, 81.5% vs 83.1%, P = 1.00). Pre-transplant drive-fine infections predicted post-transplant: infection in former drive-line or pocket sites (11 of 16 vs 14 of 94, 68.8% vs 14.9%, p = 0.01) and increased overall post-transplant hospital length of stay (16 vs 19 days, p = 0.04). They did not, however, affect post-transplant survival at I year (22 of 25 vs 69 of 85, 88% vs 81.2%, p = 0.56). Conclusions: Although survival to transplantation was diminished in LVAD patients with sepsis, if successfully transplanted, post-transplant survival was unaffected. Patients with local device infections and signs of early sepsis may warrant evaluation for urgent transplantation. A pre-transplant drive-line infection was associated with post-transplant infection in either the former pocket or drive-line site, and increased overall length of stay, but it did not decrease post-transplant survival. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:237-42. Copyright (C) 2009 by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Differential Impact on Post-transplant Outcomes between HeartMate XVE and HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Ventura, P. A.
    Reid, B. B.
    Horne, B. D.
    Mason, N. O.
    Stoker, S.
    Alharethi, R.
    Budge, D.
    Rasmusson, B.
    Doty, J.
    Clayson, S. E.
    Kfoury, A. G.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (02): : S99 - S99
  • [32] Predictors and Outcomes of Post-Left Ventricular Assist Device AKI
    Salameh, Omar K.
    Abdulbasit, Muhammad
    Dauleh, Mujahed M.
    Miller, Ronald P.
    Kaur, Gurwant
    Ghahramani, Nasrollah
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 113 - 113
  • [33] Post-transplant Outcomes for Congenital Heart Disease Patients Bridged to Transplant With Ventricular Assist Deivces
    Rizwan, Raheel
    Villa, Chet
    Zafar, Farhan
    Wells, Dennis
    Bryant, Roosevelt
    Chin, Clifford
    Lorts, Angela
    Morales, David L.
    CIRCULATION, 2016, 134
  • [34] Ventricular assist devices as a bridge-to-transplant improve early post-transplant outcomes in children
    Davies, Ryan R.
    Haldeman, Shylah
    McCulloch, Michael A.
    Pizarro, Christian
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (07): : 704 - 712
  • [35] Blood stream infection and outcomes in recipients of a left ventricular assist device
    Angleitner, Philipp
    Matic, Aleksa
    Kaider, Alexandra
    Dimitrov, Kamen
    Sandner, Sigrid
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Riebandt, Julia
    Schloglhofer, Thomas
    Laufer, Guenther
    Zimpfer, Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 58 (05) : 907 - 914
  • [36] Renal Outcomes in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplant With a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Jawitz, Oliver K.
    Fudim, Marat
    Raman, Vignesh
    Blumer, Vanessa
    Caliskan, Kadir
    DeVore, Adam D.
    Mentz, Robert J.
    Milano, Carmelo
    Soliman, Osama
    Rogers, Joseph
    Patel, Chetan B.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (02): : 567 - 574
  • [37] Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device as Bridge-to-Cardiac Transplant in Singapore
    Tan, M.
    Seah, J.
    Kerk, K. L.
    Tan, T. E.
    Sivathasan, C.
    Sim, D.
    Lim, C. P.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 38 (04): : S349 - S349
  • [38] Haemodynamic Response of Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Left Heart Disease with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy (CF-LVADS): Post-Transplant Outcomes
    Kearney, K.
    Bart, N.
    Robson, D.
    Muthiah, K.
    Hayward, C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (04): : S337 - S338
  • [39] Post-transplant Survival is Not Diminished in Heart Transplant Recipients Bridged With Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Russo, Mark
    Hong, Kimberly N.
    Davies, Ryan
    Williams, Mathew
    Argenziano, Michael
    Gelijns, Annetine
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S798 - S798
  • [40] Effect of pulmonary vascular resistance before left ventricular assist device implantation on short- and long-term post-transplant survival
    Tsukashita, Masaki
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Takeda, Koji
    Han, Jiho
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Topkara, Veli K.
    Garan, Arthur Reshad
    Mancini, Donna M.
    Kurlansky, Paul A.
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (05): : 1352 - +