Effect of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infection on Post-transplant Outcomes

被引:60
|
作者
Schulman, Allison R. [1 ]
Martens, Timothy P. [1 ]
Russo, Mark J. [1 ]
Christos, Paul J. [2 ]
Gordon, Rachel J. [1 ]
Lowy, Franklin D. [1 ]
Oz, Mehmet C. [1 ]
Naka, Yoshifumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiothorac Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Publ Hlth, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
关键词
IMPLANTATION; SUPPORT; HYPOGAMMAGLOBULINEMIA; TRANSPLANTATION; PREVENTION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURFACE; BRIDGE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2008.12.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: in this study, we sought to confirm which types of device-related infections impact bridge-to-transplant rates. We also aimed to determine the effect of device-related infections on post-transplant survival and post-transplant infection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed paper and electronic medical records for 149 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to transplantation at the Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center between 2000 and 2006. The primary outcome measures were survival to transplantation, post-transplant infection and post-transplant survival. Results: Patients with sepsis were less likely to be successfully bridged to cardiac transplantation (7 of 22 vs 103 of 127, 31.8% vs 81.1%, p = 0.01). However, if transplanted, their survival rates at 1 year were not decreased (6 of 7 vs 85 of 103, 85.7% vs 82.5%, p = 1.00). No other pre-transplant device-related infection affected post-transplant survival at 1 year (22 of 27 vs 69 of 83, 81.5% vs 83.1%, P = 1.00). Pre-transplant drive-fine infections predicted post-transplant: infection in former drive-line or pocket sites (11 of 16 vs 14 of 94, 68.8% vs 14.9%, p = 0.01) and increased overall post-transplant hospital length of stay (16 vs 19 days, p = 0.04). They did not, however, affect post-transplant survival at I year (22 of 25 vs 69 of 85, 88% vs 81.2%, p = 0.56). Conclusions: Although survival to transplantation was diminished in LVAD patients with sepsis, if successfully transplanted, post-transplant survival was unaffected. Patients with local device infections and signs of early sepsis may warrant evaluation for urgent transplantation. A pre-transplant drive-line infection was associated with post-transplant infection in either the former pocket or drive-line site, and increased overall length of stay, but it did not decrease post-transplant survival. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:237-42. Copyright (C) 2009 by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lack of sensitization and equivalent post-transplant outcomes with the Novacor left ventricular assist device
    Baran, DA
    Gass, AL
    Galin, ID
    Zucker, MJ
    Arroyo, LH
    Goldstein, DJ
    Prendergast, T
    Lubitz, S
    Courtney, MC
    Correa, R
    Chan, M
    Spielvogel, D
    Lansman, SL
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 24 (11): : 1886 - 1890
  • [2] The Impact of Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Support Before Cardiac Transplant on Post-Transplant Outcomes
    Tunuguntla, H. P.
    Denfield, S. W.
    Puri, K.
    Adachi, I.
    Cabrera, A. G.
    Rodgers, N. J.
    Goldberg, J.
    Price, J. E.
    Dreyer, W. J.
    Jeewa, A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S264 - S264
  • [3] Post-transplant survival in older patients bridged to heart transplant with left ventricular assist device support
    Dyke, D. B.
    Malani, P.
    Pagani, F. D.
    Wright, S.
    Daly-Myers, M.
    Aaronson, K.
    Koelling, T.
    Baliga, R.
    Matthews, J.
    Wu, A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 24 (02): : S75 - S76
  • [4] Timing of Ventricular Assist Device Insertion on Post-Transplant Outcomes: An Analysis of the UNOS Database
    Conway, J.
    Lake, M.
    Morales, D.
    Buchholz, H.
    Lorts, A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 34 (04): : S78 - S78
  • [5] Post-Transplant Outcomes of Patients Initially Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Device as Either Bridge to Candidacy or Destination Therapy
    Han, J.
    Ando, M.
    Garan, A. R.
    Farr, M.
    Colombo, P. C.
    Takayama, H.
    Naka, Y.
    Takeda, K.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04): : S328 - S329
  • [6] Post-transplant Outcomes of Children Bridged to Transplant With the Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
    Eghtesady, Pirooz
    Almond, Christopher S. D.
    Tjossem, Christine
    Epstein, Deirdre
    Imamura, Michiaki
    Turrentine, Mark
    Tweddell, James
    Jaquiss, Robert D. B.
    Canter, Charles
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (11) : S24 - S31
  • [7] Allosensitization does not alter post-transplant outcomes in pediatric patients bridged to transplant with a ventricular assist device
    Castleberry, Chesney
    Zafar, Farhan
    Thomas, Tamara
    Khan, Muhammad S.
    Bryant, Roosevelt
    Chin, Clifford
    Morales, David L. S.
    Lorts, Angela
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 20 (04) : 559 - 564
  • [8] Pulmonary Hypertension Results in Worse Post-Transplant Survival in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients
    Schumer, E. M.
    Black, M. C.
    Trivedi, J. R.
    Cheng, A.
    Massey, H. T.
    Slaughter, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04): : S164 - S164
  • [9] EARLY POST-TRANSPLANT SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS RECEIVING HEARTMATE 3 LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
    Sunavsky, J.
    Fujita, B.
    Boergermann, J.
    Morshuis, M.
    Fuchs, U.
    Gummert, J.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 31 : 20 - 20
  • [10] Does Left Ventricular Assist Device Mechanics Impact Pre Cardiac Transplant Allosensitization and Post-Transplant Survival?
    Allana, S.
    Liou, J.
    Jacobs, E.
    Ellis, T.
    Rahko, R.
    Akhter, S.
    Dhingra, R.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (04): : S155 - S155