Levelized costs of electricity and direct-use heat from Enhanced Geothermal Systems

被引:72
|
作者
Beckers, Koenraad F. [1 ,2 ]
Lukawski, Maciej Z. [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Brian J. [3 ]
Moore, Michal C. [4 ]
Tester, Jefferson W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Cornell Energy Inst, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] W Virginia Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Econ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
ENERGY;
D O I
10.1063/1.4865575
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
GEOPHIRES (GEOthermal energy for the Production of Heat and Electricity ("IR") Economically Simulated) is a software tool that combines reservoir, wellbore, and power plant models with capital and operating cost correlations and financial levelized cost models to assess the technical and economic performance of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). It is an upgrade and expansion of the "MIT-EGS" program used in the 2006 "Future of Geothermal Energy" study. GEOPHIRES includes updated cost correlations for well drilling and completion, resource exploration, and Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and flash power plants. It also has new power plant efficiency correlations based on AspenPlus and MATLAB simulations. The structure of GEOPHIRES enables feasibility studies of using geothermal resources not only for electricity generation but also for direct-use heating, and combined heat and power (CHP) applications. Full documentation on GEOPHIRES is provided in the supplementary material. Using GEOPHIRES, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and the levelized cost of heat (LCOH) have been estimated for 3 cases of resource grade (low-, medium-, and high-grade resource corresponding to a geothermal gradient of 30, 50, and 70 degrees C/km) in combination with 3 levels of technological maturity (today's, mid-term, and commercially mature technology corresponding to a productivity of 30, 50, and 70 kg/s per production well and thermal drawdown rate of 2%, 1.5%, and 1%). The results for the LCOE range from 4.6 to 57 (c) over bar /kWh(e) and for the LCOH from 3.5 to 14 $/MMBTU (1.2 to 4.8 (c) over bar /kWh(th)). The results for the base-case scenario (medium-grade resource and mid-term technology) are 11 (c) over bar /kWh(e) and 5 $/MMBTU (1.7 (c) over bar /kWh(th)), respectively. To account for parameter uncertainty, a sensitivity analysis has been included. The results for the LCOE and LCOH have been compared with values found in literature for EGS as well as other energy technologies. The key findings suggest that given today's technology maturity, electricity and direct-use heat from EGS are not economically competitive under current market conditions with other energy technologies. However, with moderate technological improvements, electricity from EGS is predicted to become cost-effective with respect to other renewable and non-renewable energy sources for medium-and high-grade geothermal resources. Direct-use heat from EGS is calculated to become cost-effective even for low-grade resources. This emphasizes that EGS for direct-use heat may not be neglected in future EGS development. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling of heat extraction from variably fractured porous media in Enhanced Geothermal Systems
    Hadgu, Teklu
    Kalinina, Elena
    Lowry, Thomas S.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2016, 61 : 75 - 85
  • [32] The Use of Direct Carbon Fuel Cells in Compact Energy Systems for the Generation of Electricity, Heat and Cold
    Zarzycki, Robert
    Kacprzak, Andrzej
    Bis, Zbigniew
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (11)
  • [33] Heat extraction from aquifer geothermal systems
    Yeh, Hund-Der
    Yang, Shaw-Yang
    Li, Kuang-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2012, 36 (01) : 85 - 99
  • [34] The use of geothermal energy: A reliable, cheap, and environmentally friendly method for generating electricity and heat
    Povarov O.A.
    Dubnov O.M.
    Nikol'skii A.I.
    Thermal Engineering, 2007, 54 (8) : 602 - 606
  • [35] Analysis of influencing factors of heat extraction from enhanced geothermal systems considering water losses
    Cheng, Wen-Long
    Wang, Chang-Long
    Nian, Yong-Le
    Han, Bing-Bing
    Liu, Jian
    ENERGY, 2016, 115 : 274 - 288
  • [36] Direct-Use Geothermal Energy Location Multi-Criteria Planning for On-Site Energy Security in Emergencies: A Case Study of Malaysia
    Minh-Tai Le
    Nhat-Luong Nhieu
    Thuy-Duong Thi Pham
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [37] Numerical Study on the Influence of Well Layout on Electricity Generation Performance of Enhanced Geothermal Systems
    Zeng, Yuchao
    Sun, Fangdi
    Zhai, Haizhen
    PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [38] Prospects for the use of carbon dioxide in enhanced geothermal systems in Poland
    Tarkowski, Radoslaw
    Uliasz-Misiak, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 : 1189 - 1197
  • [39] Use of Analogue Exposures of Fractured Rock for Enhanced Geothermal Systems
    Peacock, D. C. P.
    Sanderson, David J.
    Leiss, Bernd
    GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 12 (09)
  • [40] Stabilization of Forced Heat Convection: Applications to Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)
    Murad AbuAisha
    Benjamin Loret
    Transport in Porous Media, 2016, 112 : 229 - 252