Levelized costs of electricity and direct-use heat from Enhanced Geothermal Systems

被引:72
|
作者
Beckers, Koenraad F. [1 ,2 ]
Lukawski, Maciej Z. [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Brian J. [3 ]
Moore, Michal C. [4 ]
Tester, Jefferson W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Cornell Energy Inst, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] W Virginia Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Econ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
ENERGY;
D O I
10.1063/1.4865575
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
GEOPHIRES (GEOthermal energy for the Production of Heat and Electricity ("IR") Economically Simulated) is a software tool that combines reservoir, wellbore, and power plant models with capital and operating cost correlations and financial levelized cost models to assess the technical and economic performance of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). It is an upgrade and expansion of the "MIT-EGS" program used in the 2006 "Future of Geothermal Energy" study. GEOPHIRES includes updated cost correlations for well drilling and completion, resource exploration, and Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and flash power plants. It also has new power plant efficiency correlations based on AspenPlus and MATLAB simulations. The structure of GEOPHIRES enables feasibility studies of using geothermal resources not only for electricity generation but also for direct-use heating, and combined heat and power (CHP) applications. Full documentation on GEOPHIRES is provided in the supplementary material. Using GEOPHIRES, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and the levelized cost of heat (LCOH) have been estimated for 3 cases of resource grade (low-, medium-, and high-grade resource corresponding to a geothermal gradient of 30, 50, and 70 degrees C/km) in combination with 3 levels of technological maturity (today's, mid-term, and commercially mature technology corresponding to a productivity of 30, 50, and 70 kg/s per production well and thermal drawdown rate of 2%, 1.5%, and 1%). The results for the LCOE range from 4.6 to 57 (c) over bar /kWh(e) and for the LCOH from 3.5 to 14 $/MMBTU (1.2 to 4.8 (c) over bar /kWh(th)). The results for the base-case scenario (medium-grade resource and mid-term technology) are 11 (c) over bar /kWh(e) and 5 $/MMBTU (1.7 (c) over bar /kWh(th)), respectively. To account for parameter uncertainty, a sensitivity analysis has been included. The results for the LCOE and LCOH have been compared with values found in literature for EGS as well as other energy technologies. The key findings suggest that given today's technology maturity, electricity and direct-use heat from EGS are not economically competitive under current market conditions with other energy technologies. However, with moderate technological improvements, electricity from EGS is predicted to become cost-effective with respect to other renewable and non-renewable energy sources for medium-and high-grade geothermal resources. Direct-use heat from EGS is calculated to become cost-effective even for low-grade resources. This emphasizes that EGS for direct-use heat may not be neglected in future EGS development. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Levelized costs of electricity and direct-use heat from Enhanced Geothermal Systems (vol 6, 013141, 2014)
    Beckers, Koenraad F.
    Lukawski, Maciej Z.
    Anderson, Brian J.
    Moore, Michal C.
    Tester, Jefferson W.
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 6 (05)
  • [2] Direct-use of geothermal energy in the USA
    Lund, JW
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2003, 74 (1-2) : 33 - 42
  • [3] PRICING DIRECT-USE GEOTHERMAL ENERGY.
    Higbee, Charles V.
    Geothermal Resources Council, Special Report, 1980, (09): : 55 - 58
  • [4] Simulation and Levelized Cost Analysis of Direct use Geothermal Energy for Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Reyseliani, Nadhilah
    Pratama, Felix
    Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2020, 24 (04): : 273 - 283
  • [5] Evaluating the feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use in the United States
    Beckers, Koenraad F.
    Kolker, Amanda
    Pauling, Hannah
    McTigue, Joshua D.
    Kesseli, Devon
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 243
  • [6] Study on Power-saving Effects in Direct-use of Geothermal Energy for Datacenter Cooling Systems
    Matsuda, Chisato
    Mino, Yosuke
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENERGY CONFERENCE (INTELEC), 2016,
  • [7] Geochemical implications of production and storage control by coupling a direct-use geothermal system with heat networks
    Daniilidis, Alexandros
    Scholten, Tjardo
    Hooghiem, Joram
    De Persis, Claudio
    Herber, Rien
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 204 : 254 - 270
  • [8] Including seismic risk mitigation measures into the Levelized Cost Of Electricity in enhanced geothermal systems for optimal siting
    Mignan, A.
    Karvounis, D.
    Broccardo, M.
    Wiemer, S.
    Giardini, D.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 238 : 831 - 850
  • [9] 20 years of exploitation of the Yarragadee aquifer in the Perth Basin of Western Australia for direct-use of geothermal heat
    Pujol, Martin
    Ricard, Ludovic P.
    Bolton, Grant
    GEOTHERMICS, 2015, 57 : 39 - 55
  • [10] Calculation of levelized costs of electricity for various electrical energy storage systems
    Obi, Manasseh
    Jensen, S. M.
    Ferris, Jennifer B.
    Bass, Robert B.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 908 - 920