Quantitative parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI): potential application in predicting pathological grades of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

被引:24
|
作者
Ma, Wanling [1 ]
Zhang, Guangwen [1 ]
Ren, Jing [1 ]
Pan, Qi [1 ]
Wen, Didi [1 ]
Zhong, Jinman [1 ]
Zhang, Zhuoli [2 ]
Huan, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Radiol, Changle West Rd 127, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); intravoxel incoherent motion; pure diffusion coefficient; pseudodiffusion coefficient; perfusion fraction; MICROVESSEL DENSITY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; META-ANALYSIS; TUMOR GRADE; PERFUSION; LESIONS; CANCER; COEFFICIENT; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.21037/qims.2018.04.08
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to compare intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) parameters such as standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC(standard)), pure diffusion coefficient (D-slow), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D-fast) and perfusion fraction (f) for differentiating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with different pathological grades. Methods: Institutional Review Board of our hospital approved this study protocol. Subjects comprised 38 PDACs confirmed by pathology. Pancreatic multiple b values DWI with 15 b values of 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 400, 800, 1,000, 1200, 1,500, and 2,000 s/mm(2) was performed using GE Discovery MR750 3.0T scanner. ADC(standard), D-slow, D-fast and f values of all PDACs were calculated using mono-and biexponential models. Parameters of well/moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated PDAC were compared using Independent Sample t-test. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Mean Dslow value of well/moderately differentiated PDAC was significantly lower than that of poorly differentiated PDAC (0.540x10(-3) vs. 0.676x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P< 0.001). Mean f value of well/moderately differentiated PDAC was significantly higher than that of poorly differentiated PDAC (60.3% vs. 38.4%, P< 0.001). The area under curve value of f in differentiating well/ moderately differentiated PDAC from poorly differentiated PDAC was slightly higher than that of D-slow (0.894> 0.865). When the D-slow value was less than or equal to 0.599x10-(3) mm(2)/s, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 84.6% respectively. When f value was greater than 49.6%, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.0% and 84.6% respectively. Conclusions: Dslow and f derived from IVIM-DWI model can be used to distinguish well/ moderately differentiated PDAC from poorly differentiated PDAC. And to serve this purpose, Dslow and f have high diagnostic performance. IVIM-DWI is a promising and non-invasive tool for predicting pathological grade of PDAC.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 310
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Application of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hilar Obstructive Jaundice
    Xu, Xin
    Zhang, Xuening
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (02) : 228 - 234
  • [42] Preliminary Application of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Diagnosing Lung Cancer
    Jin, Xianwen
    Liu, Xianling
    Hou, Yuejiao
    Song, Gesheng
    Zhang, Chengqi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2019, 9 (04) : 776 - 780
  • [43] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Pancreas: Characterization of Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Pathologies
    Kim, Bohyun
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Sung, Yu Sub
    Cheong, Hyunhee
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Kim, Hyoung Jung
    Kim, Jin Hee
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (01) : 260 - 269
  • [44] Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, and conventional DWI in predicting the chemotherapeutic response of colorectal liver metastases
    Zhang, Huan
    Li, Wenhua
    Fu, Caixia
    Grimm, Robert
    Chen, Zhiyu
    Zhang, Wen
    Qiu, Lixin
    Wang, Chenchen
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    Yue, Lei
    Hu, Xiaoxin
    Guo, Weijian
    Tong, Tong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 130
  • [45] Application of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnosis of breast cancer
    Chen, S.
    Wang, D.
    Kong, P.
    Gu, H.
    Yu, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2023, 21 (04): : 827 - 832
  • [46] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid pancreatic masses: reliability and usefulness for characterization
    De Robertis, Riccardo
    Cardobi, Nicolo
    Ortolani, Silvia
    Martini, Paolo Tinazzi
    Stemmer, Alto
    Grimm, Robert
    Gobbo, Stefano
    Butturini, Giovanni
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [47] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid pancreatic masses: reliability and usefulness for characterization
    Riccardo De Robertis
    Nicolò Cardobi
    Silvia Ortolani
    Paolo Tinazzi Martini
    Alto Stemmer
    Robert Grimm
    Stefano Gobbo
    Giovanni Butturini
    Mirko D’Onofrio
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 131 - 139
  • [48] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Quantitative Differentiation of Breast Tumors: A Meta-Analysis
    Liang, Jianye
    Zeng, Sihui
    Li, Zhipeng
    Kong, Yanan
    Meng, Tiebao
    Zhou, Chunyan
    Chen, Jieting
    Wu, YaoPan
    He, Ni
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [49] Quantitative study of preoperative staging of gastric cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as a potential clinical index
    Zeng, Qiang
    Hong, Yanling
    Cheng, Jia
    Cai, Wangyu
    Zhuo, Huiqin
    Hou, JingJing
    Wang, Lin
    Lu, Yizhuo
    Cai, Jianchun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [50] Predicting Preoperative Pathologic Grades of Bladder Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging
    Chang, Lingyu
    Xu, Xinghua
    Wu, Guangtai
    Cheng, Lianhua
    Li, Shuyi
    Lv, Wencheng
    Pylypenko, Dmytro
    Dou, Weiqiang
    Yu, Dexin
    Wang, Qing
    Wang, Fang
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 1438 - 1446