Evaluation of nasal passage patency after antigen and histamine challenge in guinea pigs by acoustic rhinometry

被引:17
|
作者
Nakamoto, S [1 ]
Sakakura, Y [1 ]
Pedersen, OF [1 ]
Ukai, K [1 ]
机构
[1] MIE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT OTORHINOLARYNGOL,TSU,MIE 514,JAPAN
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY | 1997年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.2500/105065897781446856
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
We investigated the effects of antigen and histamine on the nasal passage patency in guinea pigs with or without nasal allergy. The change of nasal patency was measured by acoustic rhinometry and nasal airway resistance. Acoustic reflections have been used in adult humans to determine nasal cavity dimensions in terms of cross-sectional areas as a function of the distance from the nostril. In order to measure nasal cavity dimensions in guinea pigs, we modified equipment for use in humans by decreasing sound tube dimensions, increasing sampling frequency, and applying a special nosepiece. The percent change of volume, minimum cross-sectional area, and nasal airway resistance showed the largest changes at 10 minutes after antigen challenge in sensitized guinea pigs. There was a significant correlation between the individual percent change of nasal airway resistance and volume or minimum crosssectional area. Histamine, 10(2) to 10(5) mu g/mL, caused a dose-dependent reduction in percent change of volume in the challenged side of nonsensitized guinea pigs, but not in the opposite side. These results indicate that the noninvasive acoustic reflections technique is useful in small experimental animals, especially to assess the effect of nasal cavity dimensions after the challenge of antigen or nonspecific stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 89
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Peak inspiratory flow rate is more sensitive than acoustic rhinometry or rhinomanometry in detecting corticosteroid response with nasal histamine challenge
    Wilson, AM
    Sims, EJ
    Robb, F
    Cockburn, W
    Lipworth, BJ
    RHINOLOGY, 2003, 41 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [42] Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of the nasal cavity normal and allergic subjects
    Vitcheva, D
    2ND WORLD CONGRESS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC ALLERGY ENDOSCOPY AND LASER SURGERY, 2001, : 39 - 43
  • [43] Acoustic rhinometry in nasal allergen challenge study: which dimensional measures are meaningful?
    Wang, DY
    Raza, MT
    Goh, DYT
    Lee, BW
    Chan, YH
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2004, 34 (07): : 1093 - 1098
  • [44] Nasal patency measured by acoustic rhinometry in East Asian patients with sleep-disordered breathing
    Liu, Shih-An
    Su, Mao-Chang
    Jiang, Rong-San
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03): : 274 - 277
  • [45] PASSAGE OF HISTAMINE ACROSS THE WALL OF THE SMALL BOWEL OF GUINEA PIGS
    DWORETZKY, M
    CODE, CF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1951, 166 (02): : 462 - 469
  • [46] Nasal cycle in patients with septal deviation: Evaluation by acoustic rhinometry
    Sung, YW
    Lee, MH
    Kim, IJ
    Lim, DW
    Rha, KS
    Park, CI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03): : 171 - 174
  • [47] Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergic rhinitis
    Kim, Young Hyo
    Yang, Tae Yong
    Lee, Dong Youl
    Ko, Kook Jin
    Shin, Seung Ho
    Jang, Tae Young
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2008, 139 (01) : 120 - 123
  • [48] Influence of Age and Gender on Nasal Airway Patency as Measured by Active Anterior Rhinomanometry and Acoustic Rhinometry
    Wang, Jing-Jie
    Chiang, Yi-Fang
    Jiang, Rong-San
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (07)
  • [49] Physiological change in nasal patency in response to changes in posture, temperature, and humidity measured by acoustic rhinometry
    Lal, Devyani
    Gorges, Melissa L.
    Ungkhara, Girapong
    Reidy, Patrick M.
    Corey, Jacquelynne P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2006, 20 (05): : 456 - 462
  • [50] ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY COMPARED WITH ANTERIOR RHINOMANOMETRY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE RESPONSE TO NASAL ALLERGEN CHALLENGE
    SCADDING, GK
    DARBY, YC
    AUSTIN, CE
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1994, 19 (05): : 451 - 454