Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

被引:1192
|
作者
Kalia, Sarah S. [1 ]
Adelman, Kathy
Bale, Sherri J. [2 ]
Chung, Wendy K. [3 ,4 ]
Eng, Christine [5 ]
Evans, James P. [6 ]
Herman, Gail E. [7 ,8 ]
Hufnagel, Sophia B. [9 ]
Klein, Teri E. [10 ]
Korf, Bruce R. [11 ]
McKelvey, Kent D. [12 ,13 ]
Ormond, Kelly E. [10 ]
Richards, C. Sue [14 ]
Vlangos, Christopher N. [15 ]
Watson, Michael [16 ]
Martin, Christa L. [17 ]
Miller, David T. [18 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Genet, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] GeneDx Inc, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Pediat, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Mol & Human Genet, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Genet, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Ohio State Univ, Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Inst Genom Med, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[8] Ohio State Univ, Dept Pediat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[9] Childrens Natl Hlth Syst, Div Genet & Metab, Washington, DC USA
[10] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Genet, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[11] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Genet, Birmingham, AL USA
[12] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Genet, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[13] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Family Med, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[14] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Mol & Med Genet, Portland, OR USA
[15] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Richmond, VA USA
[16] Amer Coll Med Genet & Genom, Bethesda, MD USA
[17] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Autism & Dev Med Inst, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA
[18] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Genet & Genom, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
exome sequencing; genetic testing; genome sequencing; incidental findings; secondary findings;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2016.190
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
To promote standardized reporting of actionable information from clinical genomic sequencing, in 2013, the American College of Medi.cal Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) published a minimum list of genes to be reported as incidental or secondary findings. The goal was to identify and manage risks forselected highly penetrant genetic disorders through established interventions aimed at preventing or significantly reducing morbidity and mortality. The ACMG subsequently established the Secondary Findings Maintenance Working Group to develop a process for curating and updating the list over time. We describe here the new process for accepting and evaluating nominations for updates to the secondary findings list. We also report outcomes from six nominations received in the initia115 months after the process was implemented. Applying the new process while upholding the core principles of the original policy statement resulted in the addition of four genes and removal of one gene; one gene did not meet criteria for inclusion. The updated secondary findings minimum list includes 59 medically actionable genes recommended for return in clinical genomic sequencing. We discuss future areas of focus, encourage continued input from the medical community, and call for research on the impact of returning genomic secondary findings.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 255
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [32] Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
    Gregg, Anthony R.
    Skotko, Brian G.
    Benkendorf, Judith L.
    Monaghan, Kristin G.
    Bajaj, Komal
    Best, Robert G.
    Klugman, Susan
    Watson, Michael S.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (10) : 1056 - 1065
  • [33] Clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for embryo selection: A points to consider statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
    Grebe, Theresa A.
    Khushf, George
    Greally, John M.
    Turley, Patrick
    Foyouzi, Nastaran
    Rabin-Havt, Sara
    Berkman, Benjamin E.
    Pope, Kathleen
    Vatta, Matteo
    Kaur, Shagun
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 26 (04)
  • [34] The designated record set for clinical genetic and genomic testing: A points to consider statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
    Tayeh, Marwan K.
    Chen, Margaret
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Gonzales, Patrick R.
    Huang, Samuel J.
    Massingham, Lauren J.
    O'Daniel, Julianne M.
    Stewart, Douglas R.
    Stiles, Ashlee R.
    Evans, Barbara J.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (03)
  • [35] Points to consider in the detection of germline structural variants using next-generation sequencing: A statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
    Raca, Gordana
    Astbury, Caroline
    Behlmann, Andrea
    De Castro, Mauricio J.
    E. Hickey, Scott
    Karaca, Ender
    Lowther, Chelsea
    Rooney Riggs, Erin
    A. Seifert, Bryce
    C. Thorland, Erik
    Deignan, Joshua L.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (02)
  • [36] Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)
    Riggs, Erin Rooney
    Andersen, Erica F.
    Cherry, Athena M.
    Kantarci, Sibel
    Kearney, Hutton
    Patel, Ankita
    Raca, Gordana
    Ritter, Deborah I.
    South, Sarah T.
    Thorland, Erik C.
    Pineda-Alvarez, Daniel
    Aradhya, Swaroop
    Martin, Christa Lese
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (02) : 245 - 257
  • [37] Next-generation sequencing for constitutional variants in the clinical laboratory, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
    Rehder, Catherine
    Bean, Lora J. H.
    Bick, David
    Chao, Elizabeth
    Chung, Wendy
    Das, Soma
    O'Daniel, Julianne
    Rehm, Heidi
    Shashi, Vandana
    Vincent, Lisa M.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (08) : 1399 - 1415
  • [38] Correspondence on " Clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for embryo selection: A points to consider statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)" " by Grebe et al
    Widen, Erik
    Lello, Louis
    Eccles, Jennifer
    Marin, Diego
    Treff, Nathan R.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 26 (08)
  • [39] Correspondence on "Clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for embryo selection: A points to consider statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)" by Grebe et al Reply
    Grebe, Theresa A.
    Khushf, George
    Greally, John M.
    Turley, Patrick
    Foyouzi, Nastaran
    Rabin-Havt, Sara
    Berkman, Benjamin
    Pope, Kathleen
    Vatta, Matteo
    Kaur, Shagun
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 26 (08)
  • [40] Points to consider when assessing relationships (or suspecting misattributed relationships) during family-based clinical genomic testing: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
    Deignan, Joshua L.
    Chao, Elizabeth
    Gannon, Jennifer L.
    Greely, Henry T.
    Hagman, Kelly D. Farwell
    Mao, Rong
    Topper, Scott
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (08) : 1285 - 1287