Image Quality Assessment Algorithms for JPEG and JPEG2000 Images: A Comparative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Baig, Md Amir [1 ]
Moinuddin, Athar Ali [1 ]
Khan, Ekram [1 ]
机构
[1] Aligarh Muslim Univ, ZHCET, Dept Elect Engn, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The quality of images get degraded due to distortion at any stage of capturing, transmission, compression, and reproduction etc. Therefore, to evaluate the quality, a large number of objective image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms/metrics were developed and many more are forthcoming. Each of these algorithm has its own merits and demerits in terms of complexity and accuracy. In this paper, performance of some of the recently full reference and no reference IQA algorithms against specific distortion due to JPEG and JPEG2000 compression and overall distortion on three popular public databases TID2008, LIVE and CSIQ is investigated. To measure and compare the performance, Spearman's rank order correlation coefficient (SROCC), which is reported in most of the literature, is used. It is found that almost all the metrics including PSNR give good performance for specific distortion due to JPEG and JPEG2000 compression. However, the performance degrades when the algorithms are applied on overall distortions. Moreover, IQA algorithms' performance varies largely with the database. It is also noticed that many IQA metrics give similar performance for both JPEG and JPEG2000 compressed images.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 236
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Transparently Encrypted JPEG2000 Images
    Stuetz, Thomas
    Pankajakshan, Vinod
    Autrusseau, Florent
    Uhl, Andreas
    Hofbauer, Heinz
    [J]. MM&SEC 2010: 2010 ACM SIGMM MULTIMEDIA AND SECURITY WORKSHOP, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 247 - 252
  • [22] JPEG2000 Image Compression on Solar EUV Images
    Catherine E. Fischer
    Daniel Müller
    Ineke De Moortel
    [J]. Solar Physics, 2017, 292
  • [23] JPEG vs. JPEG2000: An objective comparison of image encoding quality
    Ebrahimi, F
    Chamik, M
    Winkler, S
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XXVII, PTS 1AND 2, 2004, 5558 : 300 - 308
  • [24] Spatial features based no reference image quality assessment for JPEG2000
    Sazzad, Z. M. Parvez
    Kawayoke, Y.
    Horita, Y.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 1645 - 1648
  • [25] Automatic quality assessment of JPEG and JPEG 2000 compressed images
    Good, WF
    Maitz, G
    Wang, XH
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 1-3, 2002, 4684 : 973 - 979
  • [26] Image Quality Assessment Based on Edge-Region Information and Distorted Pixel for JPEG and JPEG2000
    Seghir, Zianou Ahmed
    Hachouf, Fella
    [J]. ADVANCED CONCEPTS FOR INTELLIGENT VISION SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5807 : 156 - +
  • [27] No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Localized Gradient Statistics: Application to JPEG and JPEG2000
    Liu, Hantao
    Redi, Judith
    Alers, Hani
    Zunino, Rodolfo
    Heynderickx, Ingrid
    [J]. HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING XV, 2010, 7527
  • [28] No reference image quality assessment for JPEG2000 based on spatial features
    Sazzad, Z. M. Parvez
    Kawayoke, Y.
    Horita, Y.
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 2008, 23 (04) : 257 - 268
  • [29] JPEG vs. JPEG2000: benchmarking with dermatological images
    Guarneri, F.
    Vaccaro, M.
    Guarneri, C.
    Cannavo, S. P.
    [J]. SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 20 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [30] Performance Comparison of JPEG, JPEG2000 & JPEG XR Image Compression Standards
    Ozturk, Emir
    Mesut, Altan
    Carus, Aydin
    [J]. 2016 24TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATION APPLICATION CONFERENCE (SIU), 2016, : 201 - 204