Use of algae in poultry production: a review

被引:31
|
作者
Coudert, E. [1 ]
Baeza, E. [1 ]
Berri, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tours, UMR BOA, INRAE, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
关键词
Algae; chickens; laying hens; CARBON-DIOXIDE EXTRACTION; MICROALGA PORPHYRIDIUM SP; SPIRULINA-PLATENSIS; ANTIPROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY; NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION; ASCOPHYLLUM-NODOSUM; SUPERCRITICAL-FLUID; DIETARY SPIRULINA; ANIMAL-WELFARE; BROWN SEAWEED;
D O I
10.1080/00439339.2020.1830012
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Algae represent a large and new source of nutrients with other health benefits as supplements in animal feed formulations. 'Algae' is a generic term that groups brown, green, and red types of both macro- and micro-algae. These marine plants may play a key role in the future for poultry production, as they constitute a new and valuable nutrient source, thanks to their nutritional composition and richness in as polyphenols, polysaccharides and fatty and amino acids. Many studies have evaluated the advantages and inconvenience of using micro- and macro-algae in poultry nutrition and their ability to improve animal health and, thus, welfare. This review describes the main nutritional characteristics of algae and the current knowledge on their effects in poultry production, impacts on animal health, growth performance and product quality (eggs and meat). The increase in laying rate and egg weight can reach +4.0 to 8.6 percentage points and +1.3 to 1.5 g, respectively. The increase in body weight of broilers and decrease in feed conversion ratio can vary from 5% to 22% and from 4% to 15%, respectively. According to the literature, a dietary incorporation rate of 2% for microalgae or a range between 1% and 5% for macroalgae is suitable for both laying hens and broiler chickens, even though these ranges greatly depend on the type of algae used and the expected benefits for poultry production.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 786
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Botanical alternatives to antibiotics for use in organic poultry production
    Diaz-Sanchez, Sandra
    D'Souza, Doris
    Biswas, Debrabrata
    Hanning, Irene
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2015, 94 (06) : 1419 - 1430
  • [42] Agricultural robotics research applicable to poultry production: A review
    Ren, Guoqiang
    Lin, Tao
    Ying, Yibin
    Chowdhary, Girish
    Ting, K. C.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 169
  • [43] Wood-based litter in poultry production: a review
    Munir, M. T.
    Belloncle, C.
    Irle, M.
    Federighi, M.
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2019, 75 (01) : 5 - 16
  • [44] A review on role of exogenous enzyme supplementation in poultry production
    Munir, Khusheeba
    Maqsood, Sajid
    [J]. EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2013, 25 (01): : 66 - 80
  • [45] Optimization of light use efficiency for biofuel production in algae
    Simionato, Diana
    Basso, Stefania
    Giacometti, Giorgio M.
    Morosinotto, Tomas
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 182 : 71 - 78
  • [46] Poultry nutrition for economic egg and meat production: A review
    Mandal, AB
    Elangovan, AV
    Tyagi, PK
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2005, 75 (10): : 1215 - 1226
  • [47] NANOTECHNOLOGY CONSIDERATIONS FOR POULTRY AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS - A REVIEW
    El Sabry, Mohamed I.
    McMillin, Kenneth W.
    Sabliov, Cristina M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 18 (02): : 319 - 334
  • [48] A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production
    John J. Milledge
    Sonia Heaven
    [J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2013, 12 : 165 - 178
  • [49] In ovo delivery of bioactive substances: an alternative to the use of antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production-a review
    Oladokun, Samson
    Adewole, Deborah I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (03): : 744 - 763
  • [50] A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production
    Milledge, John J.
    Heaven, Sonia
    [J]. REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 12 (02) : 165 - 178