Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5

被引:214
|
作者
Zelinka, Mark D. [1 ]
Klein, Stephen A. [1 ]
Taylor, Karl E. [1 ]
Andrews, Timothy [2 ]
Webb, Mark J. [2 ]
Gregory, Jonathan M. [2 ,3 ]
Forster, Piers M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Program Climate Model Diag & Intercomparison, Livermore, CA 94551 USA
[2] Met Off Hadley Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ Reading, Natl Ctr Atmospher Sci, Reading, Berks, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
CLIMATE FEEDBACKS; TROPOSPHERIC ADJUSTMENT; CARBON-DIOXIDE; SENSITIVITIES; ECMWF;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00555.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Using five climate model simulations of the response to an abrupt quadrupling of CO2, the authors perform the first simultaneous model intercomparison of cloud feedbacks and rapid radiative adjustments with cloud masking effects removed, partitioned among changes in cloud types and gross cloud properties. Upon CO2 quadrupling, clouds exhibit a rapid reduction in fractional coverage, cloud-top pressure, and optical depth, with each contributing equally to a 1.1 W m(-2) net cloud radiative adjustment, primarily from shortwave radiation. Rapid reductions in midlevel clouds and optically thick clouds are important in reducing planetary albedo in every model. As the planet warms, clouds become fewer, higher, and thicker, and global mean net cloud feedback is positive in all but one model and results primarily from increased trapping of longwave radiation. As was true for earlier models, high cloud changes are the largest contributor to intermodel spread in longwave and shortwave cloud feedbacks, but low cloud changes are the largest contributor to the mean and spread in net cloud feedback. The importance of the negative optical depth feedback relative to the amount feedback at high latitudes is even more marked than in earlier models. The authors show that the negative longwave cloud adjustment inferred in previous studies is primarily caused by a 1.3 W m(-2) cloud masking of CO2 forcing. Properly accounting for cloud masking increases net cloud feedback by 0.3 W m(-2) K-1, whereas accounting for rapid adjustments reduces by 0.14 W m(-2) K-1 the ensemble mean net cloud feedback through a combination of smaller positive cloud amount and altitude feedbacks and larger negative optical depth feedbacks.
引用
收藏
页码:5007 / 5027
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cloud and Water Vapor Feedbacks to the El Nino Warming: Are They Still Biased in CMIP5 Models?
    Chen, Lin
    Yu, Yongqiang
    Sun, De-Zheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (14) : 4947 - 4961
  • [2] The two types of ENSO in CMIP5 models
    Kim, Seon Tae
    Yu, Jin-Yi
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39
  • [3] Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Hahn, L. C.
    Armour, K. C.
    Zelinka, M. D.
    Bitz, C. M.
    Donohoe, A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [4] Diagnosing atmosphere-land feedbacks in CMIP5 climate models
    Williams, C. J. R.
    Allan, R. P.
    Kniveton, D. R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [5] The Spectral Dimension of Modeled Relative Humidity Feedbacks in the CMIP5 Experiments
    Pan, Fang
    Huang, Xianglei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (24) : 10021 - 10038
  • [6] Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Meinshausen, Malte
    Arora, Vivek K.
    Jones, Chris D.
    Anav, Alessandro
    Liddicoat, Spencer K.
    Knutti, Reto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (02) : 511 - 526
  • [7] Correlation Between Cloud Adjustments and Cloud Feedbacks Responsible for Larger Range of Climate Sensitivities in CMIP6
    Lutsko, Nicholas J.
    Luongo, Matthew T.
    Wall, Casey J.
    Myers, Timothy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2022, 127 (23)
  • [8] Nonlinearity of Ocean Carbon Cycle Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models
    Schwinger, Jorg
    Tjiputra, Jerry F.
    Heinze, Christoph
    Bopp, Laurent
    Christian, James R.
    Gehlen, Marion
    Ilyina, Tatiana
    Jones, Chris D.
    Salas-Melia, David
    Segschneider, Joachim
    Seferian, Roland
    Totterdell, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (11) : 3869 - 3888
  • [9] Cloud- and ice-albedo feedbacks drive greater Greenland Ice Sheet sensitivity to warming in CMIP6 than in CMIP5
    Mostue, Idunn Aamnes
    Hofer, Stefan
    Storelvmo, Trude
    Fettweis, Xavier
    [J]. CRYOSPHERE, 2024, 18 (01): : 475 - 488
  • [10] ISCCP CLOUD BASED VERIFICATION OF CMIP5 CLIMATE SIMULATIONS
    Hayden, Lindsey
    Pan, Zaitao
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 563 - 565