Use of Interactive Technology in Captive Great Ape Management

被引:7
|
作者
Ford, Caitlin A. [1 ]
Bellward, Liz [2 ]
Phillips, Clive J. C. [3 ]
Descovich, Kris [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Vet Sci, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ Sustainabil Policy CUSP Inst, Sch Design & Built Environm, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
来源
关键词
great ape; conservation; zoo; management practices; interactive technology; WELFARE; WILD; CONSERVATION; CHIMPANZEES; ENRICHMENT; BEHAVIORS; VISITORS;
D O I
10.3390/jzbg2020021
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The conservation status of great apes (chimpanzees Pan troglodytes, gorillas Gorilla sp., orangutans Pongo sp., and bonobos Pan paniscus) is grave and zoological institutions are vital for maintaining numbers of these species and educating the public about their importance. Technology provides tools that can assist zoos in meeting these objectives. However, the extant research on technology use in zoos is potentially constrained by small sample sizes and there is no framework detailing the methodologies necessary for the successful incorporation of technology into great ape management. Therefore, this study aimed to determine current technology use in the management of captive great apes and whether technology-directed behaviour differs between ape genera. Primary carers of great apes in zoos were surveyed using a 43-question, online questionnaire. The purpose of integrating interactive technology into captive ape management was primarily for enrichment (53% of respondents), followed by research (20% of respondents). However, only 25% of respondents had apes directly engaged with technology. There were no differences in technology-directed behaviours between ape genera. By identifying differences in practice, this research marks the initial stage in developing a best practice framework for using technology.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 315
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits
    Marchetti, C
    Drent, PJ
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 60 : 131 - 140
  • [42] The Extraordinary Evolution of the Great Ape Microbiome
    Ochman, Howard
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2015, 29
  • [43] Initiation of a Great Ape Phenome Project
    Varki, A.
    Nadigam, V.
    Carlson, L. G.
    Dorner, M.
    Ryder, O.
    Baru, C.
    Varki, N.
    Benisrschke, K.
    Moore, J.
    Gagneux, P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2005, 66 : 63 - 64
  • [44] Is There 'Meaning' in Great Ape Gestural Communication?
    Liebal, Katja
    [J]. FOLIA PRIMATOLOGICA, 2013, 84 (3-5) : 297 - 298
  • [45] THE GREAT APE PROJECT - PREMISES AND IMPLICATIONS
    CAVALIERI, P
    SINGER, P
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 1995, 23 (05): : 626 - 631
  • [46] Thirty years of great ape gestures
    Michael Tomasello
    Josep Call
    [J]. Animal Cognition, 2019, 22 : 461 - 469
  • [47] Great ape interaction: Ladyginian but not Gricean
    Scott-Phillips, Thom
    Heintz, Christophe
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2023, 120 (42)
  • [48] Sequential information in a great ape utterance
    Pawel Fedurek
    Klaus Zuberbühler
    Christoph D. Dahl
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 6
  • [49] ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES AND GREAT APE HUSBANDRY
    MAPLE, TL
    STINE, WMW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 1982, 2 : 67 - 76
  • [50] Thoughts on the future of great ape research
    McConkey, EH
    Varki, A
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5740) : 1499 - 1501