A global meta-analysis of the biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits of coffee and cacao agroforestry

被引:198
|
作者
De Beenhouwer, Matthias [1 ]
Aerts, Raf [2 ]
Honnay, Olivier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, BE-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Louvain, Div Forest Nat & Landscape, BE-3001 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Agroecosystems; Tropical forest; Management intensity; Species richness; Ecosystem service decline; EPIPHYTE BIODIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; FOREST FRAGMENTS; ATLANTIC-FOREST; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; SHADE; BIRDS; LANDSCAPES; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.003
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
In tropical regions, the extent of agricultural land is rapidly increasing at the expense of natural forest with associated losses of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Agroforestry has long been proposed as a more sustainable agricultural system, conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services, while providing significant local livelihood. In this context, cacao and coffee agroforestry is often regarded as more compatible with conservation of ecosystem integrity than cacao and coffee plantations. Using meta-analytical techniques and mixed models on data from 74 studies conducted across Africa, Latin America and Asia, a global quantitative synthesis was performed to assess the impact on biodiversity and on ecosystem services of (i) the conversion of natural forest into cacao and coffee agroforestiy and (ii) the further intensification of agroforest into cacao and coffee plantation. Forest species richness and total species richness were significantly lower in the more intensively managed than in the more natural land use categories. Response ratios showed that the decline in total species richness was higher when comparing agroforest with plantation (-46%), than when comparing forest with agroforest (-11%). Biodiversity responses to intensification differed between Asia and Latin America, and between different species groups. Response ratios showed that management intensification decreased provision of ecosystem services with 37% when comparing forest with agroforest and with 27% when comparing agroforest with plantation. Our data suggest that species richness decline follows a concave yield function whereas ecosystem service decline follows a more convex yield function. Finally, we identified knowledge gaps related to a conspicuous lack of studies in Africa, and a general underreporting of ecosystem services and environmental variables related to agricultural intensification. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis
    Torralba, Mario
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Burgess, Paul J.
    Moreno, Gerardo
    Plieninger, Tobias
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 230 : 150 - 161
  • [2] Can agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in agricultural landscapes? A meta-analysis for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
    Freire Santos, Pedro Zanetti
    Crouzeilles, Renato
    Barreto Sansevero, Jeronimo Boelsums
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 433 : 140 - 145
  • [3] Biophysical drivers of yield gaps and ecosystem services across different coffee-based agroforestry management types: A global meta-analysis
    Mokondoko, Pierre
    Avila-Foucat, Veronique Sophie
    Galeana-Pizana, Mauricio
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 337
  • [4] A Global Meta-Analysis for Estimating Local Ecosystem Service Value Functions
    Magalhaes Filho, Luiz
    Roebeling, Peter
    Bastos, Maria Isabel
    Rodrigues, Waldecy
    Ometto, Giulia
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (08)
  • [5] Diverse effects of invasive ecosystem engineers on marine biodiversity and ecosystem functions: A global review and meta-analysis
    Guy-Haim, Tamar
    Lyons, Devin A.
    Kotta, Jonne
    Ojaveer, Henn
    Queiros, Ana M.
    Chatzinikolaou, Eva
    Arvanitidis, Christos
    Como, Serena
    Magni, Paolo
    Blight, Andrew J.
    Orav-Kotta, Helen
    Somerfield, Paul J.
    Crowe, Tasman P.
    Rilov, Gil
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (03) : 906 - 924
  • [6] Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis
    Paula Barral, Maria
    Rey Benayas, Jose Maria
    Meli, Paula
    Oscar Maceira, Nestor
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 202 : 223 - 231
  • [7] Effect of shade on biodiversity within coffee farms: A meta-analysis
    Manson, Sophie
    Nekaris, K. A. I.
    Nijman, Vincent
    Campera, Marco
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 914
  • [8] Tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and food production in coffee agroforestry
    Mayorga, Isabella
    de Mendonca, Jose Luiz Vargas
    Hajian-Forooshani, Zachary
    Lugo-Perez, Javier
    Perfecto, Ivette
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [9] Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis
    Rey Benayas, Jose M.
    Newton, Adrian C.
    Diaz, Anita
    Bullock, James M.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 325 (5944) : 1121 - 1124
  • [10] Restoration Enhances Wetland Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Supply, but Results Are Context-Dependent: A Meta-Analysis
    Meli, Paula
    Rey Benayas, Jose Maria
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Martinez Ramos, Miguel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):