Can agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in agricultural landscapes? A meta-analysis for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

被引:84
|
作者
Freire Santos, Pedro Zanetti [1 ]
Crouzeilles, Renato [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Barreto Sansevero, Jeronimo Boelsums [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rural Rio de Janeiro, Programa Posgrad Prat Desenvolvimento Sustentavel, Inst Florestas, BR-23890000 Seropedica, RJ, Brazil
[2] Int Inst Sustainabil, BR-22460320 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio de Janeiro, Dept Geog & Environm, Rio Conservat & Sustainabil Sci Ctr, BR-22453900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Posgrad Ecol, BR-68020 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
Agriculture; Forest landscape restoration; Land sharing; Land use planning; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.064
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Human land use has extensively degraded ecosystems, leading to biodiversity losses and reducing the provision of ecosystem services (ES). Agroforestry systems have been recommended as a cost-effective strategy that integrates production and biodiversity conservation, yet few studies have quantified the capacity of agroforestry systems to conserve biodiversity and ES provision. Here we quantify the effects of different types of agroforestry systems on biodiversity and ES in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. We compared values of biodiversity and ES in different agroforestry systems with those found in conventional production systems and in old-growth forests (reference ecosystem). We assessed 72 studies encompassing 143 study sites and 1700 quantitative comparisons. In general, agroforestry and conventional production systems had lower values of mean effect size for biodiversity and ES provision than the reference systems. However, biodiverse agroforestry systems had higher values of mean effect size for biodiversity and ES provision than simple agroforestry systems and conventional production systems. The use of biodiverse agroforestry systems as an alternative production system reduces biodiversity loss and the negative impact on ES in production areas. Agroforestry systems provide up to 45% and 65% more benefits for biodiversity and ES levels, respectively, than conventional production systems; however, these benefits differ according to the type of agroforestry system. Our findings provide empirical evidence that a biodiverse agroforestry system is the best option to enhance biodiversity and ES in degraded areas where production systems based on sustainable management of natural resources are allowed by law. Our results support environmental public policies focused on environmentally-friendly land management practice and forest landscape restoration techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 145
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis
    Torralba, Mario
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Burgess, Paul J.
    Moreno, Gerardo
    Plieninger, Tobias
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 230 : 150 - 161
  • [2] A global meta-analysis of the biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits of coffee and cacao agroforestry
    De Beenhouwer, Matthias
    Aerts, Raf
    Honnay, Olivier
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 175 : 1 - 7
  • [3] BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONAL ENHANCEMENT BY FOREST RESTORATION: A META-ANALYSIS IN CHINA
    Ren, Yanjiao
    Lu, Yihe
    Fu, Bojie
    Zhang, Kun
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (07) : 2062 - 2073
  • [4] Towards ecologically functional riparian zones: A meta-analysis to develop guidelines for protecting ecosystem functions and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes
    Lind, Lovisa
    Hasselquist, Eliza Maher
    Laudon, Hjalmar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 249
  • [5] Effects of agricultural intensification on soil biodiversity and implications for ecosystem functioning: A meta-analysis
    de Graaff, Marie-Anne
    Hornslein, Nicole
    Throop, Heather L.
    Kardol, Paul
    van Diepen, Linda T. A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 155, 2019, 155 : 1 - 44
  • [6] Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: A global review and meta-analysis
    Priyadarshana, Tharaka S.
    Martin, Emily A.
    Sirami, Clelia
    Woodcock, Ben A.
    Goodale, Eben
    Martinez-Nunez, Carlos
    Lee, Myung-Bok
    Pagani-Nunez, Emilio
    Raderschall, Chloe A.
    Brotons, Lluis
    Rege, Anushka
    Ouin, Annie
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Slade, Eleanor M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 27 (03)
  • [7] Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Indian agricultural landscape: A Meta-Analysis
    Kiran, Kumara T. M.
    Pal, Suresh
    Chand, Prem
    Kandpal, Ankita
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 62
  • [8] Meta-analysis of landowner participation in voluntary incentive programs for provision of forest ecosystem services
    Mitani, Yohei
    Lindhjem, Henrik
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (01)
  • [9] Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis
    Estrada-Carmona, Natalia
    Sanchez, Andrea C.
    Remans, Roseline
    Jones, Sarah K.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (38)
  • [10] Retention forestry as a major paradigm for safeguarding forest biodiversity in productive landscapes: A global meta-analysis
    Mori, Akira S.
    Kitagawa, Ryo
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 175 : 65 - 73