Efficacy and safety of atropine-midazolam-ketamine in pediatric oncology patients

被引:4
|
作者
Auletta, JJ [1 ]
O'Riordan, MA [1 ]
Nieder, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Rainbow Babies & Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
atropine; ketamine; midazolam; pediatric oncology; sedation; pain;
D O I
10.1016/S0011-393X(99)90006-1
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of atropine-midazolamketamine as a sedative or analgesic regimen in pediatric oncology patients undergoing painful procedures. Of 136 consecutive pediatric patients undergoing painful procedures from June 1, 1997 to June 30, 1998, 69 patients (39 males and 30 females; mean age, 7.3 +/- 4.4 years) underwent 255 procedures using intravenous atropine 0.01 mg/kg plus midazolam 0.05 mg/kg plus ketamine up to 2.0 mg/ kg. Sedation monitoring forms for these 69 patients were examined retrospectively. Vital signs, pulse oximetry, patient status, clinical effects, adverse events, and patient or parent comments were recorded at 5-minute intervals from initiation of sedation until the child was awake. Clinical efficacy was defined as procedure completion with minimal patient distress; a clinically significant adverse event was defined as baseline deviation requiring acute medical intervention to prevent or ameliorate clinical deterioration. Transient clinical effects were defined as self-limited deviations in respiratory rate, heart rate, or blood pressure,15% of age-specific norms. Most of the participants were white males with leukemia or lymphoma who were undergoing lumbar punctures. Twenty-three procedures (9.0%) required additional administration of midazolam or ketamine for pain control or sedation. The 3 most frequent transient effects were hypertension in 71 procedures (27.8%), hypotension in 53 procedures (20.8%), and tachycardia in 49 procedures (19.2%). Twenty-five procedures (9.8%) had associated complications. Ten procedures (3.9%) had ketamine-associated emergent reactions, ranging from laughing and verbosity to screaming and crying. Nine procedures (3.5%) were associated with nausea, vomiting, or dry heaving, and 2 (0.8%) were associated with shaking chills after procedure completion. The clinically significant adverse event rate was 1.6% (n = 4, all during lumbar punctures). In 1 case, the procedure was terminated prematurely because of laryngospasm; in 3 cases oxygen supplementation was required because of hypoxemia. Clinically significant adverse events were associated with younger patients and increased ketamine doses. None of the adverse events had long-term sequelae, Results of the present study suggest that the atropine-midazolam-ketamine regimen is efficacious and demonstrates an acceptable safety profile in the majority of pediatric oncology patients undergoing properly supervised sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 693
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Efficacy and Safety of Procedural Sedoanalgesia with Midazolam and Ketamine in Pediatric Hematology
    Gelen, Sema Aylan
    Sarper, Nazan
    Demirsoy, Ugur
    Zengin, Emine
    Cakmak, Esma
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2015, 32 (04) : 351 - 354
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of a mixture of ketamine, midazolam and atropine for procedural sedation in paediatric oncology: a randomised study of oral versus intramuscular route
    Bhatnagar, Sushma
    Mishra, Seema
    Gupta, Meenu
    Srikanti, Madhurima
    Mondol, Anindya
    Diwedi, Alok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2008, 44 (04) : 201 - 204
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Midazolam and Ketamine for Sedation During Invasive Procedures in Pediatric Hemato-Oncology
    Sethupathy, Abinaya
    Gunasekaran, Vinod
    Chelliah, Suresh
    Pachamuthu, Meganathan
    Duraisamy, Senguttuvan
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 91 (06): : 639 - 639
  • [4] The efficacy and safety of midazolam with fentanyl versus midazolam with ketamine for bedside invasive procedural sedation in pediatric oncology patients: A randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial
    Monsereenusorn, Chalinee
    Malaithong, Wanwipha
    Lertvivatpong, Nawachai
    Photia, Apichat
    Rujkijyanont, Piya
    Traivaree, Chanchai
    [J]. PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 39 (08) : 681 - 696
  • [5] Ketamine-midazolam versus meperidine-midazolam for painful procedures in pediatric oncology patients
    Marx, CM
    Stein, J
    Tyler, MK
    Nieder, ML
    Shurin, SB
    Blumer, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (01) : 94 - 102
  • [6] KETAMINE AND MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN THE PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY UNIT: SAFETY PROFILE IN THREE CENTERS IN LATIN AMERICA
    Gonzalez-Montalvo, Pablo
    Gonzalez, Natalia
    Cocom-Hu, Esther
    Perez-Lopez, Maribel
    Benitez-Can, Leslie
    Negroe-Ocampo, Natalia
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2022, 69 : S351 - S351
  • [7] Propofol versus midazolam/ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric oncology
    Gottschling, S
    Meyer, S
    Krenn, T
    Reinhard, H
    Lothschuetz, D
    Nunold, H
    Graf, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2005, 27 (09) : 471 - 476
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of midazolam and ketamine in paediatric upper endoscopy
    Basturk, Ahmet
    Artan, Reha
    Yilmaz, Aygen
    [J]. ARAB JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 18 (02) : 80 - 82
  • [9] PROCEDURAL SEDATION ANALGESIA AMONG PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY PATIENTS USING KETAMINE: DO WE NEED MIDAZOLAM?
    Chaudhary, Narendra
    Kumar, K. Krishna
    Rajkumar, Kundavaram
    Jain, Anuj
    Malik, Shikha
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2023, 70 : S78 - S79
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bingchen Lang
    Huiqing Wang
    Yuzhi Fu
    Linan Zeng
    Liang Huang
    Qianqian Zhang
    Shouming Chen
    Zhi-jun Jia
    Lingli Zhang
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 22