Efficacy and safety of a mixture of ketamine, midazolam and atropine for procedural sedation in paediatric oncology: a randomised study of oral versus intramuscular route

被引:18
|
作者
Bhatnagar, Sushma [1 ]
Mishra, Seema [1 ]
Gupta, Meenu [1 ]
Srikanti, Madhurima [1 ]
Mondol, Anindya [1 ]
Diwedi, Alok [2 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Biostat, New Delhi, India
关键词
intramuscular ketamine; oral ketamine; oral midazolam; paediatric oncology procedure;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01233.x
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a mixture of ketamine, midazolam and atropine given orally by comparing the same mixture given through the intramuscular route in children with malignancy undergoing minor invasive procedures. Sixty children, aged between 1 and 10 years, scheduled to undergo minor procedures were randomised into two groups to receive a mixture of ketamine (6 mg/kg), midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and atropine (0.02 mg/kg) intramuscularly (Group 1) or ketamine (10 mg/kg), midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) and atropine (0.05 mg/kg) orally (Group 2). Sedation score, observer-rated visual analogue scale for pain were noted by an observer blinded to the route of drug administration. Optimum sedation was present in all children in both groups after drug administration, with Group 1 being more deeply sedated than Group 2 at the start of the procedure. Supplementation with intravenous ketamine was required in four children in Group 1 and eight children in Group 2 (P = 0.33). The mean (+/- SD) observer-rated visual analogue scale for pain during the procedure was 8.33 (+/- 15.99) and 9.33 (+/- 16.39) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P = 0.892). One patient in Group 1 had vomiting after the procedure. There were no differences in proportion of patients with hallucinations and nystagmus in both groups. A mixture of ketamine, midazolam and atropine given orally provides sedation and analgesia similar to that produced by the same drugs given intramuscularly. It offers advantage over the intramuscular route as it is painless and can be given for minor paediatric oncology procedures with appropriate monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 204
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Effectiveness and safety of Ketamine and Midazolam mixture for procedural sedation in children with mental disabilities: A randomized study of intranasal versus intramuscular route
    Wasfy, Sanaa Farag
    Hassan, Rasha Mahmoud
    Hashim, Reham Mustafa
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 36 (01): : 16 - 23
  • [2] A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF MIDAZOLAM BY INTRANASAL AND INTRAVENOUS ROUTE FOR PAEDIATRIC PROCEDURAL SEDATION
    Mohankumar, M. K.
    Pyarajan, Shahana Jasmine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2019, 8 (10): : 728 - 732
  • [3] Propofol versus midazolam/ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric oncology
    Gottschling, S
    Meyer, S
    Krenn, T
    Reinhard, H
    Lothschuetz, D
    Nunold, H
    Graf, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2005, 27 (09) : 471 - 476
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of atropine-midazolam-ketamine in pediatric oncology patients
    Auletta, JJ
    O'Riordan, MA
    Nieder, ML
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1999, 60 (12): : 683 - 693
  • [5] Propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department: A study on efficacy and safety
    Lameijer, Heleen
    Sikkema, Ytje T.
    Pol, Albert
    Bosch, Maike G. E.
    Beije, Femke
    Feenstra, Rieneke
    Bens, Bas W. J.
    ter Avest, Ewoud
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (05): : 692 - 696
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of procedural sedation and analgesia by paediatric intensivist in paediatric oncology unit
    Haque, Anwarul
    Fadoo, Zahra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 60 (02) : 143 - 145
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of midazolam with fentanyl versus midazolam with ketamine for bedside invasive procedural sedation in pediatric oncology patients: A randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial
    Monsereenusorn, Chalinee
    Malaithong, Wanwipha
    Lertvivatpong, Nawachai
    Photia, Apichat
    Rujkijyanont, Piya
    Traivaree, Chanchai
    [J]. PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 39 (08) : 681 - 696
  • [8] Effectiveness of Oral Ketamine, Midazolam, and Atropine Cocktail Versus Oral Diphenhydramine for Pediatric Sedation in the Emergency Department
    Soleimanpour, Hassan
    Mahmoodpoor, Ata
    Milani, Farid Eftekhari
    Nia, Kavous Shahsavari
    Esfanjani, Robab Mehdizadeh
    Safari, Saeid
    [J]. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 16 (09)
  • [9] Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Procedural Sedation. A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety
    Barends, Clemens R. M.
    Absalom, Anthony
    van Minnen, Baucke
    Vissink, Arjan
    Visser, Anita
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [10] Procedural sedation in children for fractionated radiation treatment: Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam and ketamine
    Das, Rekha
    Das, Rajat
    Jena, Manoranjan
    Janka, Janaki
    Mishra, Sunita
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 66 (10) : 687 - 693