Political Advertising Online and Offline

被引:70
|
作者
Fowler, Erika Franklin [1 ]
Franz, Michael M. [2 ]
Martin, Gregory J. [3 ]
Peskowitz, Zachary [4 ]
Ridout, Travis N. [5 ]
机构
[1] Wesleyan Univ, Dept Govt, Govt, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
[2] Bowdoin Coll, Dept Govt, Govt & Legal Studies, Brunswick, ME 04011 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Polit Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Polit Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Washington State Univ, Sch Polit Philosophy & Publ Affairs, Govt & Publ Policy, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
CAMPAIGNS; TELEVISION; CANDIDATES; ADVERTISEMENTS; INCUMBENT; TURNOUT; NEWS; MAIL;
D O I
10.1017/S0003055420000696
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Despite the rapid growth of online political advertising, the vast majority of scholarship on political advertising relies exclusively on evidence from candidates' television advertisements. The relatively low cost of creating and deploying online advertisements and the ability to target online advertisements more precisely may broaden the set of candidates who advertise and allow candidates to craft messages to more narrow audiences than on television. Drawing on data from the newly released Facebook Ad Library API and television data from the Wesleyan Media Project, we find that a much broader set of candidates advertises on Facebook than television, particularly in down-ballot races. We then examine within-candidate variation in the strategic use and content of advertising on television relative to Facebook for all federal, statewide, and state legislative candidates in the 2018 election. Among candidates who use both advertising media, Facebook advertising occurs earlier in the campaign, is less negative, less issue focused, and more partisan than television advertising.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 149
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The barriers to regulating the online world: Insights from UK debates on online political advertising
    Dommett, Katharine
    Zhu, Junyan
    [J]. POLICY AND INTERNET, 2022, 14 (04): : 772 - 787
  • [32] The event-driven nature of online political hostility: How offline political events make online interactions more hostile
    Rasmussen, Stig Hebbelstrup Rye
    Petersen, Michael Bang
    [J]. PNAS NEXUS, 2023, 2 (11):
  • [33] Effects of offline ad content on online brand search: insights from super bowl advertising
    Chandrasekaran, Deepa
    Srinivasan, Raji
    Sihi, Debika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2018, 46 (03) : 403 - 430
  • [34] Online ads and offline sales: measuring the effect of retail advertising via a controlled experiment on Yahoo!
    Randall A. Lewis
    David H. Reiley
    [J]. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2014, 12 : 235 - 266
  • [35] Online ads and offline sales: measuring the effect of retail advertising via a controlled experiment on Yahoo!
    Lewis, Randall A.
    Reiley, David H.
    [J]. QME-QUANTITATIVE MARKETING AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 12 (03): : 235 - 266
  • [36] Effects of offline ad content on online brand search: insights from super bowl advertising
    Deepa Chandrasekaran
    Raji Srinivasan
    Debika Sihi
    [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2018, 46 : 403 - 430
  • [37] Social media and political discussion: when online presence silences offline conversation
    Hampton, Keith N.
    Shin, Inyoung
    Lu, Weixu
    [J]. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2017, 20 (07) : 1090 - 1107
  • [38] Relationship between online and offline political participation in sub-national campaigns
    Rodriguez-Estrada, Alejandra
    Muniz, Carlos
    Echeverria, Martin
    [J]. CUADERNOS INFO, 2020, (46) : 1 - 23
  • [39] MEDIA LOGIC AND POLITICAL LOGIC ONLINE AND OFFLINE The case of climate change communication
    Hassler, Joerg
    Maurer, Marcus
    Oschatz, Corinna
    [J]. JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2014, 8 (03) : 326 - 341
  • [40] The Influence of Social Networking Sites on Political Behavior: Modeling Political Involvement via Online and Offline Activity
    Kim, Tonghoon
    Atkin, David J.
    Lin, Carolyn A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 2016, 60 (01) : 23 - 39