Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: The University of Florence Technique

被引:10
|
作者
Serni, Sergio [1 ,2 ]
Pecoraro, Alessio [1 ]
Sessa, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Gemma, Luca [1 ]
Greco, Isabella [1 ]
Barzaghi, Paolo [1 ]
Grosso, Antonio Andrea [1 ]
Corti, Francesco [1 ]
Mormile, Nicola [1 ]
Spatafora, Pietro [1 ]
Caroassai, Simone [1 ]
Berni, Alessandro [1 ]
Gacci, Mauro [1 ]
Giancane, Saverio [1 ]
Tuccio, Agostino [1 ]
Sebastianelli, Arcangelo [1 ]
Li Marzi, Vincenzo [1 ]
Vignolini, Graziano [1 ]
Campi, Riccardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Unit Urol Robot Surg & Renal Transplantat, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Florence, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2021年 / 7卷
关键词
kidney transplantation; living donor nephrectomy; minimally invasive surgery; robotics; technique; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; DONATION; COMPLICATIONS; EVOLUTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2020.588215
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To provide a step-by-step overview of the University of Florence technique for robotic living donor nephrectomy (LDN), focusing on its technical nuances and perioperative outcomes. Methods: A dedicated robotic LDN program at our Institution was codified in 2012. Data from patients undergoing robotic LDN from 2012 to 2019 were prospectively collected. All robotic LDNs were performed by a highly experienced surgeon, using the da Vinci Si robotic platform in a three-arm configuration. In this report we provide a detailed overview of our surgical technique for robotic LDN. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of the technique, including perioperative surgical complications rate and mid-term functional outcomes. Results: Overall, 36 patients undergoing robotic LDNs were included in the study. Of these, 28 (78%) were left LDNs. Median (IQR) donor pre-operative eGFR was 88 (75.6-90) ml/min/1.73 m(2). In all cases, robotic LDN was completed without need of conversion. The median (IQR) overall operative time was 230 (195-258) min, while the median console time was 133 (IQR 117-166) min. The median (IQR) warm ischemia time was 175 (140-255) s. No intraoperative adverse events or 90-d major surgical complications were recorded. At a median (IQR) follow-up of 24 months (IQR 11-46), median (IQR) eGFR patients undergoing in living donor nephrectomy was 57.4 (47.9; 63.9) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Conclusions: In our experience, robotic LDN is technically feasible and safe. The use of robotic surgery for LDN may provide distinct advantages for surgeons while ensuring optimal donors' perioperative and functional outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robot-assisted donor nephrectomy: Initial results and comparison with the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique. A retrospective study
    Idu, Mirza M.
    Bemelman, Frederike
    Nurmohamed, Azam
    van der Pant, Karlijn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN, 2022, 43
  • [22] Economic and Utilization Analysis of Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy
    Monn, M. Francesca
    Gramm, Alec R.
    Bahler, Clinton D.
    Yang, David Y.
    Sundaram, Chandru P.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (07) : 780 - 783
  • [23] Effective and safe implementation of robot-assisted donor nephrectomy by experienced laparoscopic surgeons
    van de Geijn, Emma F.
    Janki, Shiromani
    de Vries, Dorottya K.
    Nijboer, Willemijn N.
    Alwayn, Ian P. J.
    Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen
    Baranski, Andrzej G.
    Schaapherder, Alexander F. M.
    de Vries, Aiko P. J.
    Huurman, Volkert A. L.
    Lam, Hwai-Ding
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (08) : 1958 - 1966
  • [24] Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Tamhankar, Ashwin S.
    Gautam, Gagan
    NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2018, 31 (04): : 221 - +
  • [25] Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with hydrodissection
    Izquierdo-Luna, J. S.
    Campos-Salcedo, J. G.
    Estrada-Carrasco, C. E.
    Torres-Gomez, J. J.
    Lopez-Silvestre, J. C.
    Zapata-Villatba, M. A.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2016, 40 (05): : 333 - 336
  • [26] Complications of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Rakul, S. A.
    Pozdnyakov, K., V
    Eloev, R. A.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2021, 17 (02): : 34 - 45
  • [27] Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Haifeng
    Chen, Rao
    Li, Tengfang
    Peng, Longkai
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 33 (01)
  • [28] Re: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy vs Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Editorial Comment
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02): : 505 - 506
  • [29] Cost comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    O'Malley, R. L.
    Kowalik, T.
    Hayn, M. H.
    Collins, T. B.
    Kim, H. L.
    Schwaab, T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07)
  • [30] Single-setting robot-assisted kidney transplantation consecutive to single-port laparoscopic nephrectomy in a child and robot-assisted living-related donor nephrectomy: initial Ghent experience
    Spinoit, Anne-Francoise
    Moreels, Nathalie
    Raes, Ann
    Prytula, Agnieszka
    De Groote, Ruben
    Ploumidis, Achilles
    De Bleser, Elise
    Randon, Caren
    Vanpeteghem, Caroline
    Vande Walle, Johan
    Van Laecke, Erik
    Vermassen, Frank
    Decaestecker, Karel
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2019, 15 (05) : 578 - 579