Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: The University of Florence Technique

被引:10
|
作者
Serni, Sergio [1 ,2 ]
Pecoraro, Alessio [1 ]
Sessa, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Gemma, Luca [1 ]
Greco, Isabella [1 ]
Barzaghi, Paolo [1 ]
Grosso, Antonio Andrea [1 ]
Corti, Francesco [1 ]
Mormile, Nicola [1 ]
Spatafora, Pietro [1 ]
Caroassai, Simone [1 ]
Berni, Alessandro [1 ]
Gacci, Mauro [1 ]
Giancane, Saverio [1 ]
Tuccio, Agostino [1 ]
Sebastianelli, Arcangelo [1 ]
Li Marzi, Vincenzo [1 ]
Vignolini, Graziano [1 ]
Campi, Riccardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Unit Urol Robot Surg & Renal Transplantat, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Florence, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2021年 / 7卷
关键词
kidney transplantation; living donor nephrectomy; minimally invasive surgery; robotics; technique; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; DONATION; COMPLICATIONS; EVOLUTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2020.588215
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To provide a step-by-step overview of the University of Florence technique for robotic living donor nephrectomy (LDN), focusing on its technical nuances and perioperative outcomes. Methods: A dedicated robotic LDN program at our Institution was codified in 2012. Data from patients undergoing robotic LDN from 2012 to 2019 were prospectively collected. All robotic LDNs were performed by a highly experienced surgeon, using the da Vinci Si robotic platform in a three-arm configuration. In this report we provide a detailed overview of our surgical technique for robotic LDN. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of the technique, including perioperative surgical complications rate and mid-term functional outcomes. Results: Overall, 36 patients undergoing robotic LDNs were included in the study. Of these, 28 (78%) were left LDNs. Median (IQR) donor pre-operative eGFR was 88 (75.6-90) ml/min/1.73 m(2). In all cases, robotic LDN was completed without need of conversion. The median (IQR) overall operative time was 230 (195-258) min, while the median console time was 133 (IQR 117-166) min. The median (IQR) warm ischemia time was 175 (140-255) s. No intraoperative adverse events or 90-d major surgical complications were recorded. At a median (IQR) follow-up of 24 months (IQR 11-46), median (IQR) eGFR patients undergoing in living donor nephrectomy was 57.4 (47.9; 63.9) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Conclusions: In our experience, robotic LDN is technically feasible and safe. The use of robotic surgery for LDN may provide distinct advantages for surgeons while ensuring optimal donors' perioperative and functional outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: The university of Florence technique
    Campi, R.
    Pecoraro, A.
    Sessa, F.
    Morselli, S.
    Gemma, L.
    Greco, I.
    Barzaghi, P.
    Grosso, A. A.
    Corti, F.
    Mormile, N.
    Spatafora, P.
    Caroassai, S.
    Berni, A.
    Caneschi, C.
    Gacci, M.
    Giancane, S.
    Sebastianelli, A.
    Li Marzi, V.
    Vignolini, G.
    Serni, S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1812 - S1812
  • [2] Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: surgical feasibility and technique
    Shin, Tae Young
    Lee, Yong Seong
    HELIYON, 2019, 5 (08)
  • [3] Robot-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    Dasgupta, P.
    Calder, F.
    Kandaswamy, R.
    Koffman, G.
    Mamode, N.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A100 - A100
  • [4] Developing a Robot-assisted Donor Nephrectomy Program in a High Volume Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy Program
    Lee, S. S.
    Vachharajani, N.
    Pfeiffer, M.
    Matson, S.
    Scherer, M.
    Doyle, M.
    Wellen, J.
    Lin, Y.
    Rice, T.
    Yu, J.
    Khan, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 706 - 707
  • [5] LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: A MULTICENTRIC COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STANDARD LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY.
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    Benoit, Thibaut
    May, Alexandre
    Salusto, Frederico
    Soulie, Michel
    Rischmann, Pascal
    Doumerc, Nicolas
    Game, Xavier
    Bruyere, Franck
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E385 - E385
  • [6] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: EXCESS OR OPPORTUNITY?
    Collini, Andrea
    Borgogni, Vanessa
    Ruggieri, Giuliana
    Ugolini, Gabriele
    Carmellini, Mario
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 30 : 220 - 220
  • [7] Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: The NYU Technique
    Phillips, CK
    Taneja, SS
    Stifelman, MD
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 441 - 445
  • [8] Robot-assisted living donor nephrectomy: Toward a new standard?
    Stracci, D.
    Pecoraro, A.
    Catucci, C. L.
    Gallo, M. L.
    Firenzuoli, N.
    Spatafora, P.
    Facchiano, D.
    Sessa, F.
    Tuccio, A.
    Sebastianelli, A.
    Giancane, S.
    Gacci, M.
    Vignolini, G.
    Li Marzi, V.
    Serni, S.
    Campi, R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [9] Comparison of the iliac, vaginal and umbilical graft extraction in robot-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    Abdessater, Maher
    Champy, Cecile M.
    da Costa, Jose Batista
    Courcier, Jean
    Yiou, Rene
    Hoznek, Andras
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Grimbert, Philippe
    Matignon, Marie
    Londero, Tiphanie
    le Corvoisier, Philippe
    Salomon, Laurent
    De la Taille, Alexandre
    Ingels, Alexandre
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (07) : 2783 - 2788
  • [10] Comparison of the iliac, vaginal and umbilical graft extraction in robot-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    Maher Abdessater
    Cécile M. Champy
    José Batista da Costa
    Jean Courcier
    René Yiou
    Andras Hoznek
    Dimitri Vordos
    Philippe Grimbert
    Marie Matignon
    Tiphanie Londero
    Philippe le Corvoisier
    Laurent Salomon
    Alexandre De la Taille
    Alexandre Ingels
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 2783 - 2788