Assessing and mitigating vulnerability and fire risk in historic centres: A cost-benefit analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Tozo Neto, Julio [1 ]
Ferreira, Tiago Miguel [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Univ Fundacao Assis Gurgacz, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Cascavel, BR-85806095 Cascavel, Brazil
[2] Univ Minho, Inst Sci & Innovat Biosustainabil IB S, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Azurem, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Fire risk; Built heritage; Fire Risk Index method; Cost-benefit analysis; CULTURAL-HERITAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.003
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Assessing and mitigating fire risk and vulnerability is of paramount importance, especially in historical centres, where the characteristics of the buildings and these areas themselves significantly contribute to the ignition and propagation of fire. Federal regulations require buildings to follow guidelines aimed at reducing fire risk, which may require undesirable changes to the architectural and historical characteristics of old constructions. In order to solve this conflict, some methodologies explicitly designed for the assessment of fire risk in ancient buildings, namely the ARICA and the FRI method, have been developed in recent years. A study recently conducted at the Historic Centre of Guimaraes, in Portugal, in which the condition of 269 buildings was assessed, revealed that a high percentage of these buildings present a moderate to high fire risk. Based on this previous study, the present work discusses the improvement in the fire safety of the Historic Centre of Guimaraes through the application of a series of risk mitigation strategies, which are analyzed resorting to a GIS tool. Analysis revealed that the application such intervention strategies, with an average cost of 28.48 euros per square metre, led to a reduction of the number of buildings considered to be of moderate to high fire risk from 67% to 1%, and to an increase of the percentage of buildings complying with regulations from 6% to 58%. (c) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 290
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Social vulnerability in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management
    Kind, Jarl
    Botzen, W. J. Wouter
    Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2020, 25 (02) : 115 - 134
  • [2] ASSESSING COST-BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS
    PIECUCH, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1984, 56 (05): : 391 - 391
  • [3] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Urban Fire Stations Management
    Kang Canhua
    Wu Wei
    Yan Xi
    [J]. E-BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2011, 3 : 56 - +
  • [4] Fire, Tractors, and Health in the Amazon: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fire Policy
    Morello, Thiago
    Martino, Simone
    Duarte, Alejandro F.
    Anderson, Liana
    Davis, Katrina J.
    Silva, Sonaira
    Bateman, Ian J.
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2019, 95 (03) : 409 - 434
  • [5] Mitigating infrastructure loss from beaver flooding: A cost-benefit analysis
    Hood, Glynnis A.
    Manaloor, Varghese
    Dzioba, Brendan
    [J]. HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WILDLIFE, 2018, 23 (02) : 146 - 159
  • [6] Probabilistic cost-benefit analysis for mitigating hydrogeological risks in underground construction
    Merisalu, Johanna
    Sundell, Jonas
    Rosen, Lars
    [J]. TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 131
  • [7] Fire protection costs in composite buildings for cost-benefit analysis of fire designs
    Ma, Chenzhi
    Van Coile, Ruben
    Gernay, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2024, 215
  • [8] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    [J]. KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [9] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [10] A risk-based cost-benefit analysis of LPG tank vehicles passive fire protection
    Paltrinieri, N.
    Bonvicini, S.
    Cozzani, V.
    Landucci, G.
    [J]. RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 945 - 952