Experiences and Attitudes Towards Evidence-Informed Policy-Making Among Research and Policy Stakeholders in the Canadian Agri-Food Public Health Sector

被引:10
|
作者
Young, I. [1 ,2 ]
Gropp, K. [1 ]
Pintar, K. [3 ]
Waddell, L. [1 ,2 ]
Marshall, B. [4 ]
Thomas, K. [4 ]
McEwen, S. A. [2 ]
Rajic, A. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Agcy Canada, Lab Foodborne Zoonoses, Guelph, ON N1G 5B2, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Publ Hlth Agcy Canada, Lab Foodborne Zoonoses, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Publ Hlth Agcy Canada, Ctr Food Borne Environm & Zoonot Infect Dis, Guelph, ON N1G 5B2, Canada
[5] Food & Agr Org, Nutr & Consumer Protect Div, Rome, Italy
关键词
Agri-food public health; evidence-informed policy-making; knowledge transfer and exchange; qualitative research; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; DECISION-MAKING; FRAMEWORK; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1111/zph.12108
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Policy-makers working at the interface of agri-food and public health often deal with complex and cross-cutting issues that have broad health impacts and socio-economic implications. They have a responsibility to ensure that policy-making based on these issues is accountable and informed by the best available scientific evidence. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of agri-food public health policy-makers and research and policy analysts in Ontario, Canada, to understand their perspectives on how the policy-making process is currently informed by scientific evidence and how to facilitate this process. Five focus groups of 3-7 participants and five-one-to-one interviews were held in 2012 with participants from federal and provincial government departments and industry organizations in the agri-food public health sector. We conducted a thematic analysis of the focus group and interview transcripts to identify overarching themes. Participants indicated that the following six key principles are necessary to enable and demonstrate evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) in this sector: (i) establish and clarify the policy objectives and context; (ii) support policy-making with credible scientific evidence from different sources; (iii) integrate scientific evidence with other diverse policy inputs (e.g. economics, local applicability and stakeholder interests); (iv) ensure that scientific evidence is communicated by research and policy stakeholders in relevant and user-friendly formats; (V) create and foster interdisciplinary relationships and networks across research and policy communities; and (VI) enhance organizational capacity and individual skills for EIPM. Ongoing and planned efforts in these areas, a supportive culture, and additional education and training in both research and policy realms are important to facilitate evidence-informed policy-making in this sector. Future research should explore these findings further in other countries and contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 589
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Qualitative assessment of opportunities and challenges to improve evidence-informed health policy-making in Hungary – an EVIPNet situation analysis pilot
    Péter Mihalicza
    Mark Leys
    Ilona Borbás
    Szabolcs Szigeti
    Olivia Biermann
    Tanja Kuchenmüller
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [32] Comparative effectiveness research - the missing link in evidence-informed clinical medicine and health care policy making
    Scott, Ian A.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2013, 198 (06) : 310 - 312
  • [33] Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in health sector policy-making: experience from Kenya and Malawi
    Oronje, Rose N.
    Murunga, Violet, I
    Zulu, Eliya M.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [34] Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in health sector policy-making: experience from Kenya and Malawi
    Rose N. Oronje
    Violet I. Murunga
    Eliya M. Zulu
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 17
  • [35] What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review
    Michelle M. Haby
    Evelina Chapman
    Rachel Clark
    Jorge Barreto
    Ludovic Reveiz
    John N. Lavis
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 14
  • [36] What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review
    Haby, Michelle M.
    Chapman, Evelina
    Clark, Rachel
    Barreto, Jorge
    Reveiz, Ludovic
    Lavis, John N.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
  • [37] Developing Framework and Strategies for Capacity Building to Apply Evidence-Informed Health Policy-Making in Iran: Mixed Methods Study of SAHSHA Project
    Mahdavi, Mahdi
    Khasraghi, Javad Sajjadi
    Sajadi, Haniye Sadat
    Yazdizadeh, Bahareh
    Nikooee, Sima
    Ehsani-Chimeh, Elham
    Dargahi, Hossein
    Doshmangir, Leila
    Ghaffari, Shahram
    Toyserkanmanesh, Reza
    Majdzadeh, Reza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 11 (10) : 2236 - 2247
  • [38] Promoting Researchers and Policy-Makers Collaboration in Evidence-Informed Policy-Making in Nigeria: Outcome of a Two-Way Secondment Model between University and Health Ministry
    Uneke, Chigozie Jesse
    Ezeoha, Abel Ebeh
    Uro-Chukwu, Henry Chukwuemeka
    Ezeonu, Chinonyelum Thecla
    Igboji, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 7 (06): : 522 - 531
  • [39] 3.A. Round table: Evidence-informed decision-making in patient care, public health, and health policy: the road ahead
    Panteli, Dimitra
    Sieber, Samuel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32
  • [40] Competition Authority in a Trap? A Few (Bitter) Words on Making Public Policy by Counteracting an Unfair Use of a Contractual Advantage in Agri-Food Sector in Poland
    Jurkowska-Gomutka, Agata
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2018, 16 (01) : 51 - 66