Global mapping of crustal and lithospheric thickness on Venus

被引:82
|
作者
Anderson, F. Scott
Smrekar, Suzanne E.
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Hawaii Inst Geophys & Planetol, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2004JE002395
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
[1] We have produced a high-resolution global admittance map of Venus using a spatiospectral localization technique, calculating 64,800 admittance spectra evenly spaced in latitude and longitude. We grouped the admittance spectra into 35 classes that we inverted for elastic, crustal, and lithospheric thickness using bottom-loading, top-loading, and short-wavelength top-loading models with long-wavelength bottom-loading ("hot spot'') models. Our best fit models identify 17 classes consistent with top loading (40% of the surface), 7 with bottom loading (39%), and 4 with a long-wavelength bottom-loading model (15%). The remaining seven classes (6% of the surface) generally had large-amplitude top-loading signatures that could not be fit with our models. For the classes that were successfully modeled the estimated range of crustal ( 0 - 90 km) and elastic thickness ( 0 - 100 km) is larger than results for most previous studies, primarily because of the incorporation of bottom loading. Nearly half of the planet has elastic thickness < 20 km, which we cannot distinguish from isostasy, suggesting that these regions are tectonically inactive. A key finding is that the lithospheric properties typically vary over scales of 1000 km or less except in some plains and crustal plateau regions. Both the scale and range of crustal and elastic thickness variations indicate that Venus remains an active planet and that geologic processes may be more complex than previously recognized. In many regions the correlation with surface geology is not obvious, and this suggests that deformation of the lower lithosphere and crust may occur with little surface manifestation.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-linear altimetric geoid inversion for lithospheric elastic thickness and crustal density
    Ramillien, G
    Mazzega, P
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 138 (03) : 667 - 678
  • [22] Models of ocean ridge lithospheric deformation: Dependence on crustal thickness, spreading rate, and segmentation
    Shaw, WJ
    Lin, J
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1996, 101 (B8) : 17977 - 17993
  • [23] Ancient heat flow, crustal thickness, and lithospheric mantle rheology in the Amenthes region, Mars
    Ruiz, Javier
    Fernandez, Carlos
    Gomez-Ortiz, David
    Dohm, James M.
    Lopez, Valle
    Tejero, Rosa
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2008, 270 (1-2) : 1 - 12
  • [24] Separation of dynamic and isostatic components of the Venusian gravity and topography and determination of the crustal thickness of Venus
    Yang, An
    Huang, Jinshui
    Wei, Daiyun
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2016, 129 : 24 - 31
  • [25] EVIDENCE FOR RETROGRADE LITHOSPHERIC SUBDUCTION ON VENUS
    SANDWELL, DT
    SCHUBERT, G
    SCIENCE, 1992, 257 (5071) : 766 - 770
  • [26] Integrated crustal thickness mapping and plate reconstructions for the high Arctic
    Alvey, A.
    Gaina, C.
    Kusznir, N. J.
    Torsvik, T. H.
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2008, 274 (3-4) : 310 - 321
  • [27] Regional crustal and lithospheric thickness model for Alaska, the Chukchi shelf, and the inner and outer bering shelves
    Torne, Montserrat
    Jimenez-Munt, Ivone
    Verges, Jaume
    Fernandez, Manel
    Carballo, Alberto
    Jadamec, Margarete
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 220 (01) : 522 - 540
  • [28] The isostatic stagnant lid approximation and global variations in the Venusian lithospheric thickness
    Orth, C. P.
    Solomatov, V. S.
    GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2011, 12
  • [29] CRUSTAL TECTONIC ZONE ON VENUS
    RAITALA, J
    EARTH MOON AND PLANETS, 1994, 64 (02): : 155 - 164
  • [30] A MECHANISM FOR CRUSTAL RECYCLING ON VENUS
    LENARDIC, A
    KAULA, WM
    BINDSCHADLER, DL
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 1993, 98 (E10) : 18697 - 18705