Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups

被引:61
|
作者
Jacquemyn, Y [1 ]
Sys, SU
Verdonk, P
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Obstet, Edegem, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Physiol, Edegem, Belgium
[3] Middelheim Hosp, Dept Obstet, Middelheim, Belgium
关键词
fetal biometry; ethnic differences; biparietal diameter; abdominal circumference; femur length;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-3782(99)00049-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether differences in ultrasound-measured fetal biometry exist between pregnant woman of autochthonous Belgian origin and migrant women from Morocco and Turkey. Method: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in which fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length were measured in pregnant women presenting between 18 and 40 weeks of gestation. Fetal weight was calculated using the formulae by Shepard and Hadlock. Only uncomplicated singleton pregnancies with a certain date of the last menstrual period, confirmed by early ultrasound, were included. The father of the child had to be of the same ethnic origin as the mother. Polynomial regression of the different measurements was performed for women of autochthonous Belgian origin and for migrant women from Morocco and from Turkey. Results: Singleton fetuses numbering 524 were examined, including 369 Belgian, 78 Moroccan and 77 Turkish. Polynomial regression was performed for the three groups for the biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length and estimated fetal weight. No significant difference between the three different ethnic groups could be demonstrated for the biparietal diameter (P = 0.39). There was a significant difference for the head circumference (P = 0.017), the abdominal circumference (P = 0.0015), the femur length (P = 0.0014) and the estimated fetal weight for both formulae (Shepard P = 0.047; Hadlock P = 0.0006). Conclusion: In this set of cross-sectional data no significant difference for ultrasound-measured fetal biparietal diameter between autochthonous Belgian women and migrant women from Morocco and from Turkey could be demonstrated. Differences do exist for the head circumference, the abdominal circumference, the femur length and the estimated fetal weight. The use of adapted charts of fetal size for pregnant women of Turkish or Moroccan origin should be considered. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characteristics of hypertension in different ethnic groups in Israel
    Wolak, T
    Wolak, A
    Furman, T
    Abuaraar, T
    Biton, A
    Pilpel, D
    Paran, E
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 : S102 - S102
  • [22] RHC and RHc genotyping in different ethnic groups
    Tax, MGHM
    van der Schoot, CE
    van Doorn, R
    Douglas-Berger, L
    van Rhenen, DJ
    Maaskant-van Wijk, PA
    TRANSFUSION, 2002, 42 (05) : 634 - 644
  • [23] Head lice infestations in different ethnic groups
    Downs, AMR
    Oxley, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2001, 40 (03) : 237 - 238
  • [24] Humerus length evaluation in different ethnic groups
    Mastrobattista, JM
    Pschirrer, ER
    Hamrick, MA
    Glaser, AM
    Schumacher, V
    Shirkey, BA
    Wicklund, CAL
    Hollier, LM
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (02) : 227 - 231
  • [26] RFLP STUDIES IN DIFFERENT ETHNIC-GROUPS
    HUMPHRIES, S
    TALMUD, P
    MONSALVE, V
    MCKEIGUE, P
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 1989, 75 (2-3) : 249 - 250
  • [27] AN INTEGRATION MODEL FOR TWO DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS
    Fabrizio, Mauro
    Rivera, Jaime Munoz
    EVOLUTION EQUATIONS AND CONTROL THEORY, 2014, 3 (02): : 277 - 286
  • [28] PREMATURE RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES IN DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS
    POLISHUK, WZ
    KOHANE, S
    WIZNITZE.N
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1965, 1 (03): : 450 - &
  • [29] SERIC PROTEINS IN DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS OF VENEZUELA
    DERUIZ, RB
    ACTA CIENTIFICA VENEZOLANA, 1966, 17 (04): : 125 - &
  • [30] Hiatus hernia and obesity in different ethnic groups
    Simko, V
    Ayoade, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (10): : S5 - S5