Estimating density and detection of bobcats in fragmented midwestern landscapes using spatial capture-recapture data from camera traps

被引:13
|
作者
Jacques, Christopher N. [1 ]
Klaver, Robert W. [2 ]
Swearingen, Tim C. [1 ]
Davis, Edward D. [1 ]
Anderson, Charles R. [3 ]
Jenks, Jonathan A. [4 ]
Deperno, Christopher S. [5 ]
Bluett, Robert D. [6 ]
机构
[1] Western Illinois Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Macomb, IL 61455 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Iowa Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, US Geol Survey, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Dept Nat Resources, 317 W Prospect Rd, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[4] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Management, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[5] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol Program, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[6] Illinois Dept Nat Resources, 1 Nat Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2019年 / 43卷 / 02期
关键词
bobcat; camera trap; density estimation; fragmentation; Illinois; Lynx rufus; spatial capture-recapture model; trap array; ESTIMATING POPULATION-DENSITY; ESTIMATING PUMA DENSITIES; LYNX-RUFUS; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; HABITAT SELECTION; GENETIC-STRUCTURE; UNITED-STATES; NORTH-AMERICA; HOME-RANGE;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.968
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Camera-trapping data analyzed with spatially explicit capture-recapture (SCR) models can provide a rigorous method for estimating density of small populations of elusive carnivore species. We sought to develop and evaluate the efficacy of SCR models for estimating density of a presumed low-density bobcat (Lynx rufus) population in fragmented landscapes of west-central Illinois, USA. We analyzed camera-trapping data from 49 camera stations in a 1,458-km(2) area deployed over a 77-day period from 1 February to 18 April 2017. Mean operational time of cameras was 52 days (range = 32-67 days). We captured 23 uniquely identifiable bobcats 113 times and recaptured these same individuals 90 times; 15 of 23 (65.2%) individuals were recaptured at >= 2 camera traps. Total number of bobcat capture events was 139, of which 26 (18.7%) were discarded from analyses because of poor image quality or capture of only a part of an animal in photographs. Of 113 capture events used in analyses, 106 (93.8%) and 7 (6.2%) were classified as positive and tentative identifications, respectively; agreement on tentative identifications of bobcats was high (71.4%) among 3 observers. We photographed bobcats at 36 of 49 (73.5%) camera stations, of which 34 stations were used in analyses. We estimated bobcat density at 1.40 individuals (range = 1.00-2.02)/100 km (2). Our modeled bobcat density estimates are considerably below previously reported densities (30.5 individuals/100 km (2)) within the state, and among the lowest yet recorded for the species. Nevertheless, use of remote cameras and SCR models was a viable technique for reliably estimating bobcat density across west-central Illinois. Our research establishes ecological benchmarks for understanding potential effects of colonization, habitat fragmentation, and exploitation on future assessments of bobcat density using standardized methodologies that can be compared directly over time. Further application of SCR models that quantify specific costs of animal movements (i.e., least-cost path models) while accounting for landscape connectivity has great utility and relevance for conservation and management of bobcat populations across fragmented Midwestern landscapes. (c) 2019 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 264
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating wolf (Canis lupus) densities using video camera traps and spatial capture-recapture analysis
    Jimenez, Jose
    Cara, Daniel
    Garcia-Dominguez, Francisco
    Barasona, Jose Angel
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (07):
  • [2] SPATIAL CAPTURE-RECAPTURE WITH PARTIAL IDENTITY: AN APPLICATION TO CAMERA TRAPS
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Kelly, Marcella J.
    Satter, Christopher B.
    Alonso, Robert S.
    Boydston, Erin E.
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 12 (01): : 67 - 95
  • [3] Using simulation to compare methods for estimating density from capture-recapture data
    Ivan, Jacob S.
    White, Gary C.
    Shenk, Tanya M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2013, 94 (04) : 817 - 826
  • [4] Estimating Owl Population Density Using Acoustic Spatial Capture-Recapture
    Martin, Lily H.
    Hepinstall-Cymerman, Jeffrey
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Cooper, Robert J.
    Parrish, Michael C.
    Hao, Lingyu
    Stevenson, Ben C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (01)
  • [5] Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture
    Fuller, Angela K.
    Sutherland, Chris S.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Hare, Matthew P.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (04) : 1125 - 1135
  • [6] Estimating density of ocelots in the Atlantic Forest using spatial and closed capture-recapture models
    Arrais, Ricardo Corassa
    Widmer, Cynthia Elisa
    Murray, Dennis L.
    Thornton, Daniel
    Cascelli de Azevedo, Fernando Cesar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2022, 103 (06) : 1327 - 1337
  • [7] Distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture for estimating density of Northern Bobwhite
    Nolan, Victoria
    Wilhite, Nathan
    Howell, Paige E.
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Ingram, Dallas
    Yeiser, John M.
    Scott, Chris
    Martin, James A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 78
  • [8] Estimating density for species conservation: Comparing camera trap spatial count models to genetic spatial capture-recapture models
    Burgar, Joanna M.
    Stewart, Frances E. C.
    Volpe, John P.
    Fisher, Jason T.
    Burton, A. Cole
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 15
  • [9] Estimating individual fitness in the wild using capture-recapture data
    Gimenez, Olivier
    Gaillard, Jean-Michel
    [J]. POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 60 (1-2) : 101 - 109
  • [10] ESTIMATING SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE TRAITS USING CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA
    KINGSOLVER, JG
    SMITH, SG
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 1995, 49 (02) : 384 - 388