Intra- and interobserver variability of 4D ultrasound examination of the infrarenal aorta

被引:3
|
作者
Derwich, Wojciech [1 ]
Wiedemann, Antonia [1 ]
Wittek, Andreas [2 ,3 ]
Filmann, Natalie [4 ]
Blase, Christopher [2 ,5 ]
Schmitz-Rixen, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Frankfurt Goethe Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Frankfurt Univ Appl Sci, Personalised Biomed Engn Lab, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Siegen, Dept Mech Engn, Siegen, Germany
[4] Goethe Univ, Inst Biostat & Math Modeling, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Goethe Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
4D-US; intra- and interobserver variability; reliability; strain;
D O I
10.1002/jum.15622
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives The four-dimensional ultrasound (4D-US) enables imaging of the aortic segment and simultaneous determination of the wall expansion. The method shows a high spatial and temporal resolution, but its in vivo reliability is so far unknown for low-measure values. The present study determines the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of 4D-US in the atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic infrarenal aorta. Methods In all, 22 patients with non-aneurysmal aorta were examined by an experienced examiner and a medical student. After registration of 4D images, both the examiners marked the aortic wall manually before the commercially implemented speckle tracking algorithm was applied. The cyclic changes of the aortic diameter and circumferential strain were determined with the help of custom-made software. The reliability of 4D-US was tested by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results The 4D-US measurements showed very good reliability for the maximum aortic diameter and the circumferential strain for all patients and for the non-atherosclerotic aortae (ICC >0.7), but low reliability for circumferential strain in calcified aortae (ICC = 0.29). The observer- and masking-related variances for both maximum diameter and circumferential strain were close to zero. Conclusions Despite the low-measured values, the high spatial and temporal resolution of the 4D-US enables a reliable evaluation of cyclic diameter changes and circumferential strain in non-aneurysmal aortae independent from the observer experience but with some limitations for calcified aortae. The 4D-US opens up a new perspective with regard to noninvasive, in vivo assessment of kinematic properties of the vessel wall in the abdominal aorta.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2402
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements
    Sarris, I.
    Ioannou, C.
    Chamberlain, P.
    Ohuma, E.
    Roseman, F.
    Hoch, L.
    Altman, D. G.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (03) : 266 - 273
  • [2] Evaluation of Cardiac Shunts With 4D Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Intra- and Interobserver Variability
    Urmeneta Ulloa, Javier
    Alvarez Vazquez, Ana
    Martinez de Vega, Vicente
    Cabrera, Jose Angel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (04) : 1055 - 1063
  • [3] Intravascular ultrasound and stent implantation: Intra- and interobserver variability
    Blessing, E
    Hausmann, D
    Sturm, M
    Mugge, A
    Amende, I
    [J]. HEART, 1996, 75 (05) : 224 - 224
  • [4] Editorial for "Evaluation of Cardiac Shunts With 4D Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Intra- and Interobserver Variability"
    Westenberg, Jos J. M.
    Roest, Arno A. W.
    Lamb, Hildo J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (04) : 1064 - 1065
  • [5] Laser vs ultrasound biometry—a study of intra- and interobserver variability
    S Goel
    C Chua
    M Butcher
    C A Jones
    P Bagga
    S Kotta
    [J]. Eye, 2004, 18 : 514 - 518
  • [6] Intravascular ultrasound guidance of stent implantation: Intra- and interobserver variability
    Blessing, E
    Hausmann, D
    Sturm, M
    Wolpers, HG
    Amende, I
    Mugge, A
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 1160 - 1160
  • [7] Laser vs ultrasound biometry -: a study of intra- and interobserver variability
    Goel, S
    Chua, C
    Butcher, M
    Jones, CA
    Bagga, P
    Kotta, S
    [J]. EYE, 2004, 18 (05) : 514 - 518
  • [8] Intra- and Interobserver Variability in Ultrasound Measurement of Testicular Volumes in Pubertal Boys
    Schaefer, Frank-Mattias
    Buergener, Daniel
    Stehr, Maximilian
    Rompel, Oliver
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (06):
  • [9] Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the shoulder laxity examination
    Levy, AS
    Lintner, S
    Kenter, K
    Speer, KP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (04): : 460 - 463
  • [10] Intra- and Interobserver Variability in the Assessment of Ampullary Dysplasia
    Allard, Felicia
    Goldsmith, Jeffrey
    Ayata, Gamze
    Brown, Larry
    Challies, Tracy
    Najarian, Robert
    Nasser, Imad
    Wang, Helen
    Yee, Eric
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 439A - 439A