Intra- and Interobserver Variability in Ultrasound Measurement of Testicular Volumes in Pubertal Boys

被引:0
|
作者
Schaefer, Frank-Mattias [1 ,2 ]
Buergener, Daniel [1 ]
Stehr, Maximilian [1 ]
Rompel, Oliver [3 ]
机构
[1] Cnopfsche Kinderklin, Dept Pediat Surg & Pediat Urol, D-90419 Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ FAU Erlangen Nurnberg, Univ Hosp Erlangen, Clin Urol & Pediat Urol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Univ Hosp Erlangen, Inst Radiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
来源
CHILDREN-BASEL | 2024年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
testicular size; testicular ultrasound; varicocele; intraobserver variability; interobserver variability; ORCHIDOMETER;
D O I
10.3390/children11060741
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Accurate measurement of testicular volume (TV) in boys is an important tool in clinical practice, e.g., in varicocele treatment. This study aims to assess the degree of intra- and interobserver variability of testicular volume measurements. In a prospective study, boys between 11 and 17 years of age without testicular pathology were enrolled. Testicular ultrasound was performed by three investigators (A: pediatric radiologist; B: pediatric surgery/urology resident; C: pediatric urologist). Intraobserver variability was calculated in investigators B and C and interobserver variability between all three investigators. A total of 30 boys were enrolled. Mean intraobserver variability in both observers was +0.3% with a range of -39.6 to 51.5%. The proportion of measurements with a difference >20% was 18.6%. The mean interobserver variability was -1.0% (range: -74.1% to 62.8%). The overall proportion of measurements with a difference >20% was 35%. A lower testicular size of < 4 mL showed a significantly higher rate of >20% difference in both the intraobserver group (31.1% vs. 14.4%; p = 0.035) and the interobserver group (63.2% vs. 26.2%; p = 0.000031). Furthermore, the rate of >20% difference was significantly lower in obese compared to non-obese patients in both the intraobserver (2.8% vs. 22.4%; p = 0.0084) and the interobserver group (24% vs. 40.8%, p = 0.0427). Both intraobserver and interobserver variability in ultrasound-based TV measurements in pubertal boys contain a relevant degree of uncertainty that renders them unsuitable for individualized follow-up care. At the cohort level, however, mean differences in ultrasound-based TV measurements are low enough to make ultrasound comparisons reasonable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements
    Sarris, I.
    Ioannou, C.
    Chamberlain, P.
    Ohuma, E.
    Roseman, F.
    Hoch, L.
    Altman, D. G.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (03) : 266 - 273
  • [2] Intravascular ultrasound and stent implantation: Intra- and interobserver variability
    Blessing, E
    Hausmann, D
    Sturm, M
    Mugge, A
    Amende, I
    [J]. HEART, 1996, 75 (05) : 224 - 224
  • [3] Ultrasound assessment of pubertal breast development in girls: intra- and interobserver agreement
    Ingvild Særvold Bruserud
    Mathieu Roelants
    Ninnie Helén Bakken Oehme
    Geir Egil Eide
    Robert Bjerknes
    Karen Rosendahl
    Pétur B. Júlíusson
    [J]. Pediatric Radiology, 2018, 48 : 1576 - 1583
  • [4] Ultrasound assessment of pubertal breast development in girls: intra- and interobserver agreement
    Bruserud, Ingvild Saervold
    Roelants, Mathieu
    Oehme, Ninnie Helen Bakken
    Eide, Geir Egil
    Bjerknes, Robert
    Rosendahl, Karen
    Juliusson, Petur B.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 48 (11) : 1576 - 1583
  • [5] Surprising interobserver and intraobserver variability in pediatric testicular ultrasound volumes
    Welliver, C.
    Cardona-Grau, D.
    Elebyjian, L.
    Feustel, P. J.
    Kogan, B. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2019, 15 (04) : 386.e1 - 386.e6
  • [6] Laser vs ultrasound biometry—a study of intra- and interobserver variability
    S Goel
    C Chua
    M Butcher
    C A Jones
    P Bagga
    S Kotta
    [J]. Eye, 2004, 18 : 514 - 518
  • [7] Intravascular ultrasound guidance of stent implantation: Intra- and interobserver variability
    Blessing, E
    Hausmann, D
    Sturm, M
    Wolpers, HG
    Amende, I
    Mugge, A
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 1160 - 1160
  • [8] Laser vs ultrasound biometry -: a study of intra- and interobserver variability
    Goel, S
    Chua, C
    Butcher, M
    Jones, CA
    Bagga, P
    Kotta, S
    [J]. EYE, 2004, 18 (05) : 514 - 518
  • [9] Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of Quantitative Ultrasound Measurement of the Plantar Fascia
    Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
    Moelgaard, Carsten
    Olesen, Jens Lykkegaard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2011, 39 (03) : 128 - 134
  • [10] The intra- and interobserver reproducibility of pelvic ultrasound for the detection and measurement of endometriotic lesions
    Bean, E.
    Chaggar, P.
    Thanatsis, N.
    Dooley, W.
    Bottomley, C.
    Jurkovic, D.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : I281 - I281