Integrating Liquid Biopsy and Radiomics to Monitor Clonal Heterogeneity of EGFR-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

被引:27
|
作者
Cucchiara, Federico [1 ]
Del Re, Marzia [1 ]
Valleggi, Simona [2 ]
Romei, Chiara [3 ]
Petrini, Iacopo [2 ,4 ]
Lucchesi, Maurizio [2 ]
Crucitta, Stefania [1 ]
Rofi, Eleonora [1 ]
De Liperi, Annalisa [3 ]
Chella, Antonio [2 ]
Russo, Antonio [5 ]
Danesi, Romano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Clin Pharmacol & Pharmacogenet Unit, Pisa, Italy
[2] Azienda Osped Univ Pisana, Cardiovasc & Thorac Dept, Pneumol Unit, Pisa, Italy
[3] Azienda Osped Univ Pisana, Dept Diagnost & Imaging, Radiol Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
[4] Univ Pisa, Dept Translat Res & New Technol Med & Surg, Pisa, Italy
[5] Univ Palermo, Dept Surg Oncol & Stomatol Sci, Sect Med Oncol, Palermo, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷
关键词
non-small cell lung cancer; EGFR; liquid biopsy; cell free DNA; radiomics; tyrosine kinase inhibitors; precision medicine; ACQUIRED-RESISTANCE; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; MUTATION; T790M; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEFITINIB; C797S; OSIMERTINIB; ERLOTINIB; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.593831
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background EGFR-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is a dynamic entity and tumor progression and resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) arise from the accumulation, over time and across different disease sites, of subclonal genetic mutations. For instance, the occurrence of EGFR T790M is associated with resistance to gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, while EGFR C797S causes osimertinib to lose activity. Sensitive technologies as radiomics and liquid biopsy have great potential to monitor tumor heterogeneity since they are both minimally invasive, easy to perform, and can be repeated over patient's follow-up, enabling the extraction of valuable information. Yet, to date, there are no reported cases associating liquid biopsy and radiomics during treatment. Case presentation In this case series, seven patients with metastatic EGFR-positive NSCLC have been monitored during target therapy. Plasma-derived cell free DNA (cfDNA) was analyzed by a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), while radiomic analyses were performed using the validated LifeX (R) software on computed tomography (CT)-images. The dynamics of EGFR mutations in cfDNA was compared with that of radiomic features. Then, for each EGFR mutation, a radiomic signature was defines as the sum of the most predictive features, weighted by their corresponding regression coefficients for the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed to estimate their diagnostic performance. The signatures achieved promising performance on predicting the presence of EGFR mutations (R-2 = 0.447, p <0.001 EGFR activating mutations R-2 = 0.301, p = 0.003 for T790M; and R-2 = 0.354, p = 0.001 for activating plus resistance mutations), confirmed by ROC analysis. Conclusion To our knowledge, these are the first cases to highlight a potentially promising strategy to detect clonal heterogeneity and ultimately identify patients at risk of progression during treatment. Together, radiomics and liquid biopsy could detect the appearance of new mutations and therefore suggest new therapeutic management.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Liquid biopsy for EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer cases by RT-PCR
    Koc, Altug
    Goksel, Tuncay
    Komurcuoglu, Berna
    Kaya, Ozge Ozer
    Ozyilmaz, Berk
    Gursoy, Pinar
    Kutbay, Yasar B.
    Kirbiyik, Ozgur
    Ozdemir, Taha Resid
    Erdogan, Kadri Murat
    Guvenc, Merve Saka
    Kocal, Gizem Calibasi
    Baskin, Yasemin
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [22] Rapid diagnosis of liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer by the EGFR-LAMP assay
    Saito, Y.
    Matsui, A.
    Michiyuki, S.
    Morooka, H.
    Ibi, T.
    Yamauchi, Y.
    Takahashi, N.
    Shimizu, Y.
    Ikeya, T.
    Hoshi, E.
    Sakao, Y.
    Kawamura, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S1223 - S1223
  • [23] Indirect treatment comparisons of relative efficacy for aumolertinib vs osimertinib in EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Popat, S.
    Stergiopoulos, S.
    King, S.
    Curtis, M.
    Dillon, A.
    Akehurst, R.
    Lee, D.
    Guelfucci, F.
    Ngami, A.
    Bianic, F.
    Li, Y.
    Ali, S.
    Miller, V.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S1012 - S1013
  • [24] FIRST-LINE TREATMENT EFFICACY IN EGFR-POSITIVE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    van Nimwegen, K.
    Nientker, K.
    Cakar, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S22 - S22
  • [25] Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer: come of age
    Ahn, Myung-Ju
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 5 : S629 - S631
  • [26] Liquid Biopsy Mutation Profiling in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Gedvilaite, V.
    Sestokaite, A.
    Sabaliauskaite, R.
    Jarmalaite, S.
    Cicenas, S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (03) : S256 - S257
  • [27] Liquid Biopsy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Highlights and Challenges
    Rijavec, Erika
    Coco, Simona
    Genova, Carlo
    Rossi, Giovanni
    Longo, Luca
    Grossi, Francesco
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [28] Afatinib in EGFR mutation positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Davies, R. S.
    Brewster, A. E.
    Button, M. R.
    Lester, J. F.
    LUNG CANCER, 2016, 91 : S22 - S22
  • [29] Optimized selection of three major EGFR-TKIs in advanced EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yaxiong
    Sheng, Jin
    Yang, Yunpeng
    Fang, Wenfeng
    Kang, Shiyang
    He, Yang
    Hong, Shaodong
    Zhan, Jianhua
    Zhao, Yuanyuan
    Xue, Cong
    Ma, Yuxiang
    Zhou, Ting
    Ma, Shuxiang
    Gao, Fangfang
    Qin, Tao
    Hu, Zhihuang
    Tian, Ying
    Hou, Xue
    Huang, Yan
    Zhou, Ningning
    Zhao, Hongyun
    Zhang, Li
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (15) : 20093 - 20108
  • [30] Management of EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Lilenbaum, Rogerio A.
    Horn, Leora A.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2016, 14 (5.5): : 672 - 674