Cost containment in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Feasibility and advantages over open radical nephrectomy

被引:7
|
作者
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ]
Cestari, Andrea [1 ]
Naspro, Richard [1 ]
Riva, Matteo [1 ]
Rigatti, Patrizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ist Sci H San Raffaele, Dept Urol, I-20127 Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2006.20.509
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To highlight the impact of the laparoscopic experience of the surgical team on achievement of satisfactory results with cost containment in performing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Patients and Methods: We compared the cost components of 15 consecutive uncomplicated LRNs performed in 2001 (LRN01) with 15 consecutive uncomplicated laparoscopic radical nephrectomies performed in 2003 (LRN03) and with 15 consecutive uncomplicated procedures performed at our institution by the same surgical team in the year 1999 matched for patient age, tumor size, and disease stage. The groups were comparable in demographics. Results: The operative times were 250, 225, and 195 minutes in the LRN01, LRN03, and open-surgery groups, respectively, while the lengths of postoperative stay were 3.8, 3.1, and 6.5 days. Operating room costs, excluding the disposable instruments, were 11.00 /min for the open surgery and 10.00 /min for laparoscopic nephrectomy, and the cost of the postoperative stay was 300 to 310 per day. The cost of disposable instruments was 952.18 for LRN01 and 146.37 for LRN03. The overall costs were 4155.00 for the open-surgery group, 4672.00 for LRN01, and 3336.37 for LRN03. Conclusions: Cost containment in laparoscopic nephrectomy is possible. A proper team learning curve and the employment of reliable reusable instruments is the key to reducing costs, making this procedure as economically advantageous as the equivalent open procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 513
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy
    A. C. Tierney
    S. Y. Nakada
    World Journal of Urology, 2000, 18 : 249 - 256
  • [22] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Ding, Qiang
    Xia, Guo-wei
    Zhang, Yuan-fang
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A114 - A114
  • [23] Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy
    Tierney, AC
    Nakada, SY
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 18 (04) : 249 - 256
  • [24] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the elderly
    Varkarakis, I
    Neururer, R
    Harabayashi, T
    Bartsch, G
    Peschel, R
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (04) : 517 - 520
  • [25] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Yin, Changiun
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A116 - A116
  • [26] Limits of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    Alvarez-Maestro, Mario
    Rios, Emilio
    Martinez-Pineiro, Luis
    Diez, Jesus
    Javier Sanchez, Francisco
    Linares, Ana
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (01): : 168 - 179
  • [27] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer
    Gill, IS
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (04) : 707 - +
  • [28] Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison with transabdominal radical nephrectomy
    Mancini, GJ
    McQuay, LA
    Klein, FA
    Mancini, ML
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2002, 68 (02) : 151 - 153
  • [29] LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY, RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY AND ADRENALECTOMY - NAGOYA EXPERIENCE
    ONO, Y
    KATOH, N
    KINUKAWA, T
    SAHASHI, M
    OHSHIMA, S
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (06): : 1962 - 1966
  • [30] RESULTS OF 100 CASES OF RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY: COMPARISON WITH OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Oh, K. J.
    Nam, D. H.
    Kim, S. O.
    Jung, S. I.
    Kang, T. W.
    Kwon, D. D.
    Park, K.
    Ryu, S. B.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A154 - A155