Cost containment in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Feasibility and advantages over open radical nephrectomy

被引:7
|
作者
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ]
Cestari, Andrea [1 ]
Naspro, Richard [1 ]
Riva, Matteo [1 ]
Rigatti, Patrizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ist Sci H San Raffaele, Dept Urol, I-20127 Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2006.20.509
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To highlight the impact of the laparoscopic experience of the surgical team on achievement of satisfactory results with cost containment in performing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Patients and Methods: We compared the cost components of 15 consecutive uncomplicated LRNs performed in 2001 (LRN01) with 15 consecutive uncomplicated laparoscopic radical nephrectomies performed in 2003 (LRN03) and with 15 consecutive uncomplicated procedures performed at our institution by the same surgical team in the year 1999 matched for patient age, tumor size, and disease stage. The groups were comparable in demographics. Results: The operative times were 250, 225, and 195 minutes in the LRN01, LRN03, and open-surgery groups, respectively, while the lengths of postoperative stay were 3.8, 3.1, and 6.5 days. Operating room costs, excluding the disposable instruments, were 11.00 /min for the open surgery and 10.00 /min for laparoscopic nephrectomy, and the cost of the postoperative stay was 300 to 310 per day. The cost of disposable instruments was 952.18 for LRN01 and 146.37 for LRN03. The overall costs were 4155.00 for the open-surgery group, 4672.00 for LRN01, and 3336.37 for LRN03. Conclusions: Cost containment in laparoscopic nephrectomy is possible. A proper team learning curve and the employment of reliable reusable instruments is the key to reducing costs, making this procedure as economically advantageous as the equivalent open procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 513
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison with open radical nephrectomy
    Lee, SE
    Ku, JH
    Kwak, C
    Kim, HH
    Paick, SH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (03): : 756 - 759
  • [3] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy versus open radical nephrectomy: A outcome analysis
    Vyas, Jigish
    Ganpule, Arvind
    Sharma, Rajan
    Muthu, V.
    Manohar, T.
    Desai, Mahesh R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A188 - A188
  • [4] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a cost saving procedure compared to open radical nephrectomy for solid renal masses
    Lee, BC
    Rodin, DM
    Sacco, DE
    Brown, JA
    Dahl, DM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 44 - 44
  • [5] Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison to open radical nephrectomy
    Nakada, SY
    Fadden, P
    Jarrard, DF
    Moon, TD
    UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (04) : 517 - 520
  • [6] Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison to open radical nephrectomy
    Yip, SK
    Tan, YH
    Cheng, WS
    UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (04) : 632 - 632
  • [7] RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY (LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN) IN OCTOGENARIANS
    Vasdev, N.
    Hussien, H.
    Davidson, A.
    Wood, H.
    Durkan, G. C.
    O'Riordan, A.
    Soomro, N.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 179 : S351 - S351
  • [8] Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison with conventional open radical nephrectomy
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Hara, Isao
    Nakano, Yuzo
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    Fujisawa, Masato
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) : 429 - 432
  • [9] PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY (LRN) VERSUS OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY (ORN)
    Sanli, O.
    Tefik, T.
    Ortac, M.
    Karakus, S.
    Kucukdurmaz, F.
    Esen, T.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A107 - A107
  • [10] Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison to open radical nephrectomy - Reply
    Nakada, SY
    UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (04) : 633 - 633