Statistical formats to optimize evidence-based decision making: A behavioral approach

被引:3
|
作者
Arribas, Ivan [1 ]
Comeig, Irene [2 ]
Urbano, Amparo [2 ]
Vila, Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, ERI CES, Ivie, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, ERI CES, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
Economic experiments; Statistical formats; Probability judgment; Orthogonal design; Judgment under uncertainty; INFORMATION; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.046
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Statistical information is crucial for managerial decision making. The decision-making literature in psychology and mathematical cognition documents how different statistical formats can facilitate certain types of decisions. The present analysis is the first of its kind to assess the impact of statistical formats in the presentation of data from market research on both the optimality of market decisions and the time required to perform the decision-making process. An economic experiment provides the data for this study. The experiment presents statistical information in simple frequencies and relative frequencies using numerical and pictorial representations in the context of different informational environments. The key findings are that statistical information presented in terms of relative frequency formats gives rise to more accurate decision making than data presented in terms of simple frequencies, independently of the informational environments. When time is the relevant variable, numerical formats lead to a faster interpretation than pictorial ones. Since the number of factors defining the four statistical formats and the different informational environments is quite large, an orthogonal design offers a suitable experimental design. This design keeps the experiment manageable without substantially reducing its analytical power. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 794
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evidence-Based Decision-Making is Individualized Clinical Decision-Making
    Gordon Guyatt
    中国循证医学杂志, 2007, (02) : 85 - 92
  • [32] Evidence-based decision making: Global evidence, local decisions
    Clancy, CM
    Cronin, K
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [33] Unpacking the process of interpretation in evidence-based decision making
    Engebretsen, Eivind
    Vollestad, Nina Kopke
    Wahl, Astrid Klopstad
    Robinson, Hilde Stendal
    Heggen, Kristin
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (03) : 529 - 531
  • [34] Decision Making in Advanced Otosclerosis: An Evidence-Based Strategy
    Merkus, Paul
    van Loon, Maarten C.
    Smit, Conrad F.
    Smits, Cas
    de Cock, Adrianus F. C.
    Hensen, Erik F.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2011, 121 (09): : 1935 - 1941
  • [35] Evidence-based practice: The cornerstone of clinical decision making
    Quick, Julie
    JOURNAL OF PERIOPERATIVE PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (12) : 331 - 331
  • [36] Cultivating an Evidence-Based Decision-Making Mindset
    Milner, Kerry A.
    Hays, Deana
    Farus-Brown, Susan
    Zonsius, Mary C.
    Fineout-Overholt, Ellen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2024, 124 (02) : 40 - 46
  • [37] Evidence-based decision making at the core of orthopaedic practice
    Griffin, X. L.
    Haddad, F. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (08): : 1000 - 1001
  • [38] Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice
    Adams, JR
    Drake, RE
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2006, 42 (01) : 87 - 105
  • [39] Towards Evidence-Based Decision Making in Asset Management
    Kortelainen, Helena
    Rantala, Antti
    Ahonen, Toni
    Tervo, Jesse
    15TH WCEAM PROCEEDINGS, 2022, : 312 - 323
  • [40] Health Decision Making: Lynchpin of Evidence-Based Practice
    Spring, Bonnie
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (06) : 866 - 874