The impact of intraoperative fluid management during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on donor and recipient outcomes

被引:2
|
作者
Williams, Aaron M. [1 ]
Kumar, Sathish S. [2 ]
Bhatti, Umar F. [1 ]
Biesterveld, Ben E. [1 ]
Kathawate, Ranganath G. [1 ]
Sung, Randall S. [1 ]
Woodside, Kenneth J. [1 ]
Englesbe, Michael J. [1 ]
Alameddine, Mitchell B. [1 ]
Waits, Seth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Anesthesiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
fluid directed management; fluid status; intraoperative fluid management; laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; recipient outcomes; RENAL-FUNCTION; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.13542
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Intraoperative fluid management during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) may have a significant effect on donor and recipient outcomes. We sought to quantify variability in fluid management and investigate its impact on donor and recipient outcomes. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent LDN from July 2011 to January 2016 with paired kidney recipients at a single center was performed. Patients were divided into tertiles of intraoperative fluid management (standard, high, and aggressive). Donor and recipient demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results Overall, 413 paired kidney donors and recipients were identified. Intraoperative fluid management (mL/h) was highly variable with no correlation to donor weight (kg) (R = 0.017). The aggressive fluid management group had significantly lower recipient creatinine levels on postoperative day 1. However, no significant differences were noted in creatinine levels out to 6 months between groups. No significant differences were noted in recipient postoperative complications, graft loss, and death. There was a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the number of total donor complications in the aggressive fluid management group. Conclusions Aggressive fluid management during LDN does not improve recipient outcomes and may worsen donor outcomes compared to standard fluid management.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Donor, and Early and Late Recipient Outcomes Following Hand Assisted and Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
    Lucas, Steven M.
    Liaw, Aron
    Mhapsekar, Rishi
    Yelfimov, Daniel
    Goggins, William C.
    Powelson, John A.
    Png, Keng Siang
    Sundaram, Chandru P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02): : 618 - 622
  • [22] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Multiple arteries are not a predictor of recipient outcomes.
    Bearden, Christopher M.
    Tso, P. L.
    Turgeon, N. A.
    Ogan, K.
    Pearson, T. C.
    Kirk, A. D.
    Larsen, C. P.
    Newell, K. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 : 457 - 457
  • [23] Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Comparable donor/recipient outcomes, costs, and decreased convalescence as compared to open donor nephrectomy
    Rudich, SM
    Marcovich, R
    Magee, JC
    Punch, JD
    Campbell, DA
    Merion, RM
    Konnak, JW
    Wolf, JS
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1106 - 1107
  • [24] Donor and Recipient Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Obese Versus Nonobese Donors: A Prospective Study
    Rizvi, Syed Jamal
    Garg, Naresh
    Khemchandani, Sajni
    Modi, Pranjal R.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (06) : 1661 - 1664
  • [25] Donor and Recipient Outcomes following Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review
    Creta, Massimiliano
    Calogero, Armando
    Sagnelli, Caterina
    Peluso, Gaia
    Incollingo, Paola
    Candida, Maria
    Minieri, Gianluca
    Longo, Nicola
    Fusco, Ferdinando
    Tammaro, Vincenzo
    Dodaro, Concetta Anna
    Mangiapia, Francesco
    Carlomagno, Nicola
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [26] Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison of outcomes
    Ruiz-Deya, G
    Cheng, S
    Palmer, E
    Thomas, R
    Slakey, D
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (04): : 1270 - 1273
  • [27] Recipient outcomes in total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with multiple renal vessels
    Fitzpatrick, John
    Chmelo, Jakub
    Nambiar, Arjun
    Fuge, Oliver
    Page, Toby
    Sen, Gourab
    Soomro, Naeem
    Rix, David
    Rogers, Alistair
    Talbot, David
    Veeratterapillay, Rajan
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2020, 12 (03) : 266 - 270
  • [28] A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy
    Nogueira, JM
    Cangro, CB
    Fink, JC
    Schweitzer, E
    Wiland, A
    Klassen, DK
    Gardner, J
    Flowers, J
    Jacobs, S
    Cho, E
    Philosophe, B
    Bartlett, ST
    Weir, MR
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (05) : 722 - 728
  • [29] Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for the pediatric recipient population: Risk factors for adverse outcomes
    Walther, Ashley E.
    Coots, Abigail C.
    Goebel, Jens W.
    Alonso, Maria H.
    Ryckman, Frederick C.
    Tiao, Greg M.
    Nathan, Jaimie D.
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 19 (08) : 836 - 843
  • [30] Determinants of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes
    Hu, Jim C.
    Liu, Chia-Hung
    Treat, Eric G.
    Ernest, Alexander
    Veale, Jeffrey
    Carter, Stacey
    Huang, Kuo-How
    Blumberg, Jeremy M.
    Schulam, Peter G.
    Gritsch, Hans A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (03) : 659 - 664