Modified dixon-based renal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI facilitates automated registration and perfusion analysis

被引:9
|
作者
de Boer, Anneloes [1 ]
Leiner, Tim [1 ]
Vink, Eva E. [1 ]
Blankestijn, Peter J. [1 ]
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
DCE MRI; kidney; registration; automated postprocessing; Dixon; perfusion contrast agent; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; SINGLE-KIDNEY-FUNCTION; DCE-MRI; CELL CARCINOMA; 2-COMPARTMENT MODEL; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MUTUAL-INFORMATION; PARAMETERS; FRAMEWORK; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.26999
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeRenal dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides information on renal perfusion and filtration. However, clinical implementation is hampered by challenges in postprocessing as a result of misalignment of the kidneys due to respiration. We propose to perform automated image registration using the fat-only images derived from a modified Dixon reconstruction of a dual-echo acquisition because these provide consistent contrast over the dynamic series. MethodsDCE data of 10 hypertensive patients was used. Dual-echo images were acquired at 1.5T with temporal resolution of 3.9 s during contrast agent injection. Dixon fat, water, and in-phase and opposed-phase (OP) images were reconstructed. Postprocessing was automated. Registration was performed both to fat images and OP images for comparison. Perfusion and filtration values were extracted from a two-compartment model fit. ResultsAutomatic registration to fat images performed better than automatic registration to OP images with visible contrast enhancement. Median vertical misalignment of the kidneys was 14mm prior to registration, compared to 3mm and 5mm with registration to fat images and OP images, respectively (P=0.03). Mean perfusion values and MR-based glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were 23364mL/100mL/min and 60 +/- 36mL/minute, respectively, based on fat-registered images. MR-based GFR correlated with creatinine-based GFR (P=0.04) for fat-registered images. For unregistered and OP-registered images, this correlation was not significant. ConclusionAbsence of contrast changes on Dixon fat images improves registration in renal DCE MRI and enables automated postprocessing, resulting in a more accurate estimation of GFR. Magn Reson Med 80:66-76, 2018. (c) 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 76
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantification of Renal Perfusion: Comparison of Arterial Spin Labeling and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Winter, Jeff D.
    St Lawrence, Keith S.
    Cheng, Hai-Ling Margaret
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 34 (03) : 608 - 615
  • [2] Texture analysis of lesion perfusion volumes in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Lee, Sang Ho
    Kim, Jong Hyo
    Park, Jeong Seon
    Chang, Jung Min
    Park, Sang Joon
    Jung, Yun Sub
    Tak, Sungho
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 1545 - +
  • [3] Quantitative assessment of pulmonary perfusion with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Hatabu, H
    Tadamura, E
    Levin, DL
    Chen, Q
    Li, W
    Kim, D
    Prasad, PV
    Edelman, RR
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1999, 42 (06) : 1033 - 1038
  • [4] Acral fibromyxoma: Findings on dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI
    Lacroix, Maxime
    Burns, Robert
    Campagna, Raphael
    Larousserie, Frederique
    Drape, Jean-Luc
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (01) : 59 - 61
  • [5] Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Perfusion Quantification With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Taouli, Bachir
    Johnson, R. Scott
    Hajdu, Cristina H.
    Oei, Marcel T. H.
    Merad, Miriam
    Yee, Herman
    Rusinek, Henry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) : 795 - 800
  • [6] Evaluation of lung tumor perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Pauls, Sandra
    Mottaghy, Felix M.
    Schmidt, Stefan A.
    Krueger, Stefan
    Moeller, Peter
    Brambs, Hans-Juergen
    Wunderlich, Arthur
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 26 (10) : 1334 - 1341
  • [7] Measuring Perfusion and Permeability in Renal Cell Carcinoma With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Study
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    Sourbron, Steven
    Staehler, Michael
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Attenberger, Ulrike I.
    Schmidt, Gerwin R.
    Boehm, Holger
    Horng, Annie
    Glaser, Christian
    Stief, Christian
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Herrmann, Karin A.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (02) : 490 - 501
  • [8] Evaluating the Accuracy and Impact of Registration in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI
    Hill, Andrew
    Mehnert, Andrew
    Crozier, Stuart
    McMahon, Kerry
    CONCEPTS IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE PART B-MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENGINEERING, 2009, 35B (02) : 106 - 120
  • [9] Cluster analysis of dynamic cerebral contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI time-series
    Wismüller, A
    Meyer-Baese, A
    Lange, O
    Reiser, MF
    Leinsinger, G
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2006, 25 (01) : 62 - 73
  • [10] Registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a progressive principal component registration (PPCR)
    Melbourne, A.
    Atkinson, D.
    White, M. J.
    Collins, D.
    Leach, M.
    Hawkes, D.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (17): : 5147 - 5156