Assessments: Structure, concepts, and methods

被引:0
|
作者
不详
机构
关键词
Assessment; basic societal functions; benefits; concepts; data; data collection; demands; effects; errors; goals; impact; indicators; information; methods; objectives; outcomes; process; Sphere project; structure; tools;
D O I
10.1177/1403494813515114
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Assessments are an essential element of proper disaster management. Assessments help to define the damage and changes in functions at the time of the assessment. Assessments are transectional across the longitudinal phases of the disaster. Any intervention should be preceded by an assessment(s). The assessment process is deconstructed into a series of 10 steps: (1) need to know; (2) define the goal(s) and objectives(s) of an assessment; (3) select the appropriate indicators; (4) define the methods to be used for the assessment; (5) develop and test a plan for data collection; (6) train and brief data collectors; (7) gather (collect) the data; (8) synthesise the data and information collected; (9) output information for decision-making; and (10) compare findings with overarching goal and objectives. Steps 7-9 constitute a production process. Understanding this process is essential for identification of points of success and failure in achieving the desired assessment. Assessments require careful selection of indicators. The selected indicators are used throughout the process. Currently, no standardised set of indicators has been validated. Criteria for the composition of assessment teams are provided and common sources of error are discussed. Prior to, during, and following disasters, assessments are directed by the appropriate coordination and control entity.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 101
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lexicon of the Biblical Hermeneutics: Concepts - Methods - Theories - Concepts
    Lange, Armin
    David, Nora
    Stemberger, Gunter
    Weigold, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF ANCIENT JUDAISM, 2010, 1 (02) : 263 - 263
  • [32] ASSESSMENTS OF NEW METHODS OF CANCER THERAPY
    BAKER, CG
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1970, 48 (05) : 119 - &
  • [33] METHODS FOR PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENTS OF GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
    MANN, CJ
    MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1988, 20 (05): : 589 - 601
  • [34] Geosite assessments: comparison of methods and results
    Strba, L'ubomir
    Rybar, Pavol
    Balaz, Bartolomej
    Molokac, Mario
    Hvizdak, Ladislav
    Krsak, Branislav
    Lukac, Marian
    Muchova, Lenka
    Tometzova, Dana
    Ferencikova, Jarmila
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2015, 18 (05) : 496 - 510
  • [35] Methods for probabilistic safety assessments of ships
    Kaneko, F
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 7 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [36] METHODS FOR COMBINING EXPERTS PROBABILITY ASSESSMENTS
    JACOBS, RA
    NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 7 (05) : 867 - 888
  • [37] AVOIDANCE METHODS IN NEUROBEHAVIORAL TOXICITY ASSESSMENTS
    BIGNAMI, G
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR BAKTERIOLOGIE MIKROBIOLOGIE UND HYGIENE SERIE B-UMWELTHYGIENE KRANKENHAUSHYGIENE ARBEITSHYGIENE PRAVENTIVE MEDIZIN, 1987, 185 (1-2): : 36 - 47
  • [38] Methods for probabilistic safety assessments of ships
    Fujio Kaneko
    Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2002, 7 : 1 - 16
  • [39] Searching for the vulnerable: A review of the concepts and assessments of vulnerability related to poverty
    Guimarães R.J.R.
    The European Journal of Development Research, 2007, 19 (2) : 234 - 250
  • [40] New concepts, models, and assessments of climate-wise connectivity
    Keeley, Annika T. H.
    Ackerly, David D.
    Cameron, D. Richard
    Heller, Nicole E.
    Huber, Patrick R.
    Schloss, Carrie A.
    Thorne, James H.
    Merenlender, Adina M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (07):