Measurement of body surface energy leakage of defibrillation shock by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

被引:3
|
作者
Niwano, S
Kojima, J
Inuo, K
Saito, J
Kashiwa, T
Suyama, M
Toyoshima, T
Aizawa, Y
Izumi, T
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2288555, Japan
[2] Medtron Japan Co Ltd, Tachy Business Grp, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Medtron Japan Co Ltd, Res & Dev, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Niigata Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Niigata, Japan
来源
关键词
defibrillation; electrical stimulation; electrical shock; tachyarrhythmias; antitachycardia device;
D O I
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01212.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Leakage of electrical current from the body surface during a defibrillation shock delivery by an ICD device was evaluated in 27 patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. All patients underwent the implantation of the Medtronic jewel Plus ICD system, and the defibrillation shocks were delivered between the active can implanted in the left subclavicular region and the endocardial lead placed in the right ventricle. At the time of measurement of the effect of electrical energy delivery for defibrillation, the shocks were delivered in a biphasic form at the energy level of 20 or 30 J. During each delivery of the defibrillation shock, the electrical current to the body surface was measured through large skin electrodes (6.2 cm(2)) that were pasted at the following positions: (1) parallel position: the electrodes were placed at the left shoulder and the right low-chest, and the direction of the electrode vector was parallel to the direction of the defibrillation energy flow, and (2) cross position: the electrodes were placed at the right shoulder and the left low-chest, and the vector of the electrodes was roughly perpendicular to the direction of the energy flow. The energy leakages were measured in 80 defibrillation shocks. The peak leakage current during the shock delivery at energy of 30 J was 48 +/- 26 mA at the parallel position and 19 +/- 15 mA at the cross position (P = 0.0002). The energy leakage at a 30-J shock was 7.4 +/- 7.2 mJ at the parallel position and 1.4 +/- 2.3 mJ at the cross position (P = 0.0002). The actual maximum energy leakage was 105 mA, 29 mJ, and 106 V that appeared at the parallel position. The body surface leakage of the defibrillation energy of the ICD device was evaluated. The power of the energy leakage strongly depended on the angle between the alignment of the recording electrodes and the direction of the energy flow. The highest current leakage to the body surface reached a considerable level, but the energy leakage was small because of the short duration of the defibrillation shock.
引用
收藏
页码:1212 / 1218
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement of body-surface leakage energy of defibrillation shock by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) system in humans
    Niwano, S
    Kojima, J
    Yoshizawa, N
    Inuo, K
    Hara, H
    Saito, J
    Moriguchi, M
    Kitano, Y
    Niwano, H
    Izumi, T
    EUROPACE 2001, 2001, : 137 - 141
  • [2] Leakage of energy to the body surface during defibrillation shock by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TCD) system - Experimental evaluation during defibrillation shocks through the right ventricular lead and the subcutaneous active-can in canines
    Niwano, S
    Kitano, Y
    Moriguchi, M
    Yoshizawa, N
    Kashiwa, T
    Suyama, M
    Toyoshima, T
    Izumi, T
    JAPANESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL-ENGLISH EDITION, 2001, 65 (03): : 219 - 225
  • [4] Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with and without Defibrillation Threshold Testing
    Codner, Pablo
    Nevzorov, Roman
    Kusniec, Jairo
    Haim, Moti
    Zabarski, Ronit
    Strasberg, Boris
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (06): : 343 - 346
  • [5] Body surface potentials during discharge of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator
    Peters, W
    Kowallik, P
    Reisberg, M
    Meesmann, M
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (05) : 491 - 497
  • [6] INCREASED SHOCK IMPEDANCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH FAILED SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD TESTING
    Saltzman, Heath E.
    Angel, Brett
    Overcash, Jay
    Kutalek, Steven
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 351 - 351
  • [7] A technique to overcome high defibrillation thresholds for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
    Boos, Christopher J.
    Bentall, Andrew J.
    Marshall, Howard J.
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2009, 19 (03) : 291 - 291
  • [8] RELATION OF THE INTRAOPERATIVE DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD TO SUCCESSFUL POSTOPERATIVE DEFIBRILLATION WITH AN AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
    MARCHLINSKI, FE
    FLORES, B
    MILLER, JM
    GOTTLIEB, CD
    HARGROVE, WC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 62 (07): : 393 - 398
  • [9] The values of defibrillation testing at implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: 'and then there were none'
    Gasparini, Maurizio
    Galimberti, Paola
    Ceriotti, Carlo
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 27 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [10] Failed Maximal Defibrillation Threshold Testing in the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
    Levine, Joshua D.
    Ellins, Catherine
    Winn, Nancy
    Kim, Robert
    Hsu, Steve S.
    Catanzaro, John N.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 136 (01) : 29 - 32