Assessment of the ecological status of European surface waters: a work in progress

被引:85
|
作者
Noges, Peeter [1 ,2 ]
van de Bund, Wouter [1 ]
Cardoso, Ana Cristina [1 ]
Solimini, Angelo G. [1 ,3 ]
Heiskanen, Anna-Stiina [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[2] Estonian Univ Life Sci, Ctr Limnol, Inst Agr & Environm Sci, EE-61117 Rannu, Tartumaa, Estonia
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Expt Med, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[4] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Ctr Marine Res, Res Programme Protect Balt Sea, Helsinki 00251, Finland
关键词
Water Framework Directive; Intercalibration; Multimetric index; Biological indicators; One out/all out principle; SUBMERGED MACROPHYTES; PHYTOPLANKTON ASSOCIATIONS; ERROR PROPAGATION; MULTIMETRIC INDEX; FISH PREDATION; SHALLOW LAKES; TROPHIC STATE; IMPACT; QUALITY; ECOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10750-009-9883-9
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
The 'normative definitions' of ecological water quality classes given by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) are narrative descriptions of the conditions present in water bodies of different qualities relative to reference conditions found in unimpacted sites. In order to fill these descriptions with a more solid content, the definitions have been a subject of intensive development of quantitative methodologies for ecological status assessment as well as for rules and criteria for setting of reference conditions and ecological status boundaries for classification of water bodies. In this article, we recall the basic principles of the WFD that sometimes have been overlooked and point out some gaps remained and problems arisen during the ongoing implementation of the directive. Defining type-specific reference conditions for water bodies and finding biological metrics that sensitively reflect only the anthropogenic deviations from those conditions are the biggest challenges that the ecological status assessment faces. So far, there is no guarantee that reference conditions are comparable across EU Member States due to a lack of common criteria, which need still to be elaborated. Defining site-specific reference conditions instead of type specific is a novel approach that allows for minimizing uncertainties introduced by applying broad types. Search for new metrics has led to a real boom of multimetric indices which ought to be the adequate tool to measure the multiple human impairments but which should pass a thorough check before being included in monitoring programs. Curiously, some biological indices constructed as surrogates for chemistry (especially nutrients) start 'living their own life' and continue indicating the disturbance when the controlling factors change. This shows the obvious advantage of biological indicators against chemical ones. New challenges to WFD implementation are brought about by the need to consider the effects of alien species and climate change in the assessment framework, and by the nonlinear dose-response relationships dominating in biological systems. Attempts to diminish uncertainties in quality assessment have become a new labour-intensive field for researchers.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:197 / 211
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transitional and coastal waters ecological status assessment: advances and challenges resulting from implementing the European Water Framework Directive
    Angel Borja
    Mike Elliott
    Peter Henriksen
    Núria Marbà
    Hydrobiologia, 2013, 704 : 213 - 229
  • [22] Using machine learning for the assessment of ecological status of unmonitored waters in Poland
    Andrzej Martyszunis
    Małgorzata Loga
    Karol Przeździecki
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [23] Transitional and coastal waters ecological status assessment: advances and challenges resulting from implementing the European Water Framework Directive
    Borja, Angel
    Elliott, Mike
    Henriksen, Peter
    Marba, Nuria
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2013, 704 (01) : 213 - 229
  • [24] A neural-fuzzy approach to classify the ecological status in surface waters
    Ocampo-Duque, William
    Schuhmacher, Marta
    Domingo, Jose L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2007, 148 (02) : 634 - 641
  • [25] The ecological status of European rivers: evaluation and intercalibration of assessment methods
    Mike T. Furse
    Daniel Hering
    Karel Brabec
    Andrea Buffagni
    Leonard Sandin
    Piet F. M. Verdonschot
    Hydrobiologia, 2006, 566 : 1 - 2
  • [26] The ecological status of European rivers: evaluation and intercalibration of assessment methods
    Furse, Mike T.
    Hering, Daniel
    Brabec, Karel
    Buffagni, Andrea
    Sandin, Leonard
    Verdonschot, Piet F. M.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2006, 566 (1) : 1 - 2
  • [27] Probabilistic ecological risk assessment for three chlorophenols in surface waters of China
    John P.Giesy
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2012, (02) : 329 - 334
  • [28] A tiered ecological risk assessment of three chlorophenols in Chinese surface waters
    Jin, Xiaowei
    Gao, Jijun
    Zha, Jinmiao
    Xu, Yiping
    Wang, Zijian
    Giesy, John P.
    Richardson, Kristine L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2012, 19 (05) : 1544 - 1554
  • [29] Distribution characteristics and ecological risk assessment of PAHs in surface waters of China
    Guo GuangHui
    Wu FengChang
    He HongPing
    Zhang RuiQing
    Li HuiXian
    Feng ChengLian
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2012, 55 (06) : 914 - 925
  • [30] Triazine herbicides: Ecological risk assessment in North American surface waters
    Solomon, KR
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 211 : 164 - AGRO