Delisting pressure, executive compensation, and corporate fraud: Evidence from China

被引:43
|
作者
Zhou, Fangzhao [1 ]
Zhang, Zenan [1 ]
Yang, Jun [2 ]
Su, Yunpeng [3 ]
An, Yunbi [4 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Acadia Univ, FC Manning Sch Business Adm, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada
[3] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Delisting pressure; Corporate fraud; Executive compensation; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; EQUITY INCENTIVES; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; MATTER; FIRM; PAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.01.003
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper studies the relationship between executive compensation and the incidence of corporate fraud in Chinese listed companies from the perspective of delisting pressure. We find that delisting pressure directly contributes to the incidence of fraud, especially the incidence of information disclosure violations, given the unique listing and delisting systems in the Chinese stock market. We also find that CEOs and CFOs with relatively low pay are more likely to commit fraud, regardless of whether or not delisting pressure is present. However, delisting pressure weakens the negative relationship between executive pay and the likelihood of corporate fraud. Finally, when equity incentives are also considered, the effect of CEOs' total compensation on fraud is contingent on delisting pressure. High CEOs' total compensation has a deterring effect on fraud for firms with no delisting pressure, while this effect disappears for firms with delisting pressure.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:17 / 34
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of CFO gender on corporate fraud: Evidence from China
    Luo, Jin-hui
    Peng, Chenchen
    Zhang, Xin
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2020, 63
  • [32] Impact of executive compensation on corporate tax aggressiveness: evidence from India
    Gill, Suveera
    Arora, Taruntej Singh
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2022, 48 (06) : 833 - 852
  • [33] Corporate governance reforms and executive compensation determination: Evidence from the UK
    Girma, Sourafel
    Thompson, Steve
    Wright, Peter W.
    MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2007, 75 (01): : 65 - 81
  • [34] Corporate diversification, executive compensation and firm value: Evidence from Australia
    Choe, Chongwoo
    Dey, Tania
    Mishra, Vinod
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 39 (03) : 395 - 414
  • [35] Compensation negotiation and corporate governance: the evidence from China
    Lyu, Xinjun
    Decker, Christopher
    Ni, Jinlan
    JOURNAL OF CHINESE ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2018, 16 (02) : 193 - 213
  • [36] Corporate site visits, private monitoring and fraud: Evidence from China
    Broadstock, David
    Chen, Xiaoqi
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 40
  • [37] Fraud, Enforcement Action, and the Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from China
    Jia, Chunxin
    Ding, Shujun
    Li, Yuanshun
    Wu, Zhenyu
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 90 (04) : 561 - 576
  • [38] Do foreign investors deter corporate fraud? Evidence from China
    Liang, Quanxi
    Gao, Wenlian
    Xie, Hongji
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2022, 84 : 92 - 111
  • [39] Does Network Embeddedness Deter Corporate Fraud? Evidence from China
    Zhao, Jing
    Zhu, Liang
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2023, 59 (09) : 2906 - 2927
  • [40] Mandatory IFRS adoption and executive compensation: Evidence from China
    Hou, Qingchuan
    Jin, Qinglu
    Wang, Lanfang
    CHINA JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (01) : 9 - 29