Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility

被引:5
|
作者
Chen, Shuanglian [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Hao [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Int Inst Finance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Stat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
asymmetric; connectedness; bitcoin; realized volatility; good and bad volatility; common and idiosyncratic volatility; CRUDE-OIL; RISK SPILLOVER; ENERGY; PRICE; RETURNS; CONTAGION; FUTURES; LINKAGES; EXCHANGE; DOLLAR;
D O I
10.3389/fphy.2020.582817
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explore the volatility spillovers across different Bitcoin markets. We decompose the realized volatility into common and idiosyncratic volatilities, as well as the good and bad volatilities. Then the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between Bitcoin markets is measured by the DY (Diebold and Yilmaz) index. In addition, we construct statistics to test the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between different Bitcoin markets. The results are achieved as follows. The spillovers of systematic and idiosyncratic volatilities dominate the connectedness among different Bitcoin markets. In addition, the idiosyncratic volatility spillovers are more easily influenced by policies. Good volatility spillovers dominate the Bitcoin markets and change over time. The further results suggest that there is significant asymmetry between systematic and idiosyncratic volatility spillovers in the Bitcoin markets, while the asymmetries between good and bad volatility spillovers are heterogeneous in different markets. The findings in this paper can provide some suggestions for regulators controlling market stability and investors generating investment strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Dynamic Volatility Connectedness Structure of Energy Futures and Global Financial Markets: Evidence From a Novel Time-Frequency Domain Approach
    Bagheri, Ehsan
    Ebrahimi, Seyed Babak
    Mohammadi, Arman
    Miri, Mahsa
    Bekiros, Stelios
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 59 (03) : 1087 - 1111
  • [32] Dynamic and Static Volatility Interruptions: Evidence from the Korean Stock Markets
    Eom, Kyong Shik
    Kwon, Kyung Yoon
    La, Sung Chae
    Park, Jong-Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (03)
  • [33] Agricultural commodity markets and oil prices: An analysis of the dynamic return and volatility connectedness
    Umar, Zaghum
    Jareno, Francisco
    Escribano, Ana
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 73
  • [34] Dynamic volatility spillovers and connectedness between global, regional, and GIPSI stock markets
    Mensi, Walid
    Boubaker, Ferihane Zaraa
    Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed
    Kang, Sang Hoon
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 25 : 230 - 238
  • [35] Volatility spillovers of cloud stocks: Evidence from China using the dynamic connectedness approach
    Lin, Lichao
    Cheung, Adrian
    Yan, Wan-Lin
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2024,
  • [36] Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Evidence from the options market
    Hoang, Lai T.
    Baur, Dirk G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2020, 40 (10) : 1584 - 1602
  • [37] Forecasting realized volatility of Bitcoin: The informative role of price duration
    Slim, Skander
    Tabche, Ibrahim
    Koubaa, Yosra
    Osman, Mohamed
    Karathanasopoulos, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2023, 42 (07) : 1909 - 1929
  • [38] The Bitcoin price and Bitcoin price uncertainty: Evidence of Bitcoin price volatility
    Kose, Nezir
    Yildirim, Hakan
    Unal, Emre
    Lin, Boqiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2024, 44 (04) : 673 - 695
  • [39] Volatility connectedness in global foreign exchange markets
    Wen, Tiange
    Wang, Gang-Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 54
  • [40] Volatility connectedness on the central European forex markets
    Albrecht, Peter
    Kocenda, Evzen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 93