Optimal consistency and consensus models for interval additive preference relations: A discrete distribution perspective

被引:35
|
作者
Wu, Zhibin [1 ]
Yang, Xieyu [1 ]
Tu, Jiancheng [1 ]
Chen, Xue [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision making; interval information; consistency; consensus; integer programming; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; PRIORITY WEIGHTS; FUZZY; AGGREGATION; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; ISSUES; GDM;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2019.1621219
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
To assist in the consensus reaching process, this article presents optimization models with interval additive preference relations (APRs) drawn from pairwise comparisons. First, consistency models are proposed to obtain additively consistent interval APRs for continuous and discrete scale cases, after which consensus models are established to arrive at a predefined consensus level for the two cases. These models seek to minimize the amount of preference changes and can be solved using linear or integer linear programming techniques. While the obtained solutions may not be unique, a second stage model is introduced to reduce the uncertainty degrees in the suggested preferences. Compared to existing approaches, the proposed models have two major advantages: the derived solution can be limited to the easy to understand original scales, and refined solutions can be determined using multi-stage optimization. Finally, several numerical examples are given to verify the proposed models, and several simulations are conducted to demonstrate the potential behaviour of the presented models in practical applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1479 / 1497
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deriving priority weights from hesitant fuzzy preference relations in view of additive consistency and consensus
    Li, Jian
    Wang, Zhong-Xing
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (24) : 13691 - 13707
  • [22] An Alternative Consensus Model of Additive Preference Relations for Group Decision Making Based on the Ordinal Consistency
    Xu, Yejun
    Xi, Yusha
    Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 21 (06) : 1818 - 1830
  • [23] An Alternative Consensus Model of Additive Preference Relations for Group Decision Making Based on the Ordinal Consistency
    Yejun Xu
    Yusha Xi
    Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
    Enrique Herrera-Viedma
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2019, 21 : 1818 - 1830
  • [24] Deriving priority weights from hesitant fuzzy preference relations in view of additive consistency and consensus
    Jian Li
    Zhong-Xing Wang
    Soft Computing, 2019, 23 : 13691 - 13707
  • [25] Group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency and consensus
    Jian Li
    Li-li Niu
    Qiongxia Chen
    Zhong-xing Wang
    Wenjing Li
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2022, 8 : 2203 - 2225
  • [26] Consensus Modelling on Interval-Valued Fuzzy Preference Relations with Normal Distribution
    Wang, Lihong
    Gong, Zaiwu
    Zhang, Ning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2018, 11 (01) : 706 - 715
  • [27] Consensus Modelling on Interval-Valued Fuzzy Preference Relations with Normal Distribution
    Lihong Wang
    Zaiwu Gong
    Ning Zhang
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2018, 11 : 706 - 715
  • [28] Goal programming models for incomplete interval additive reciprocal preference relations with permutations
    Mao-Jie Huang
    Fang Liu
    Ya-Nan Peng
    Qin Yu
    Granular Computing, 2020, 5 : 373 - 386
  • [29] Goal programming models for incomplete interval additive reciprocal preference relations with permutations
    Huang, Mao-Jie
    Liu, Fang
    Peng, Ya-Nan
    Yu, Qin
    GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2020, 5 (03) : 373 - 386
  • [30] Consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations: An interval consistency index
    Li, Cong-Cong
    Rodriguez, Rosa M.
    Martinez, Luis
    Dong, Yucheng
    Herrera, Francisco
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 432 : 347 - 361