Validation and Reliability of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire

被引:96
|
作者
Penniston, Kristina L. [1 ]
Antonelli, Jodi A. [2 ]
Viprakasit, Davis P. [3 ]
Averch, Timothy D. [4 ]
Sivalingam, Sri [5 ]
Sur, Roger L. [6 ]
Pais, Vernon M., Jr. [7 ]
Chew, Ben H. [8 ]
Bird, Vincent G. [9 ]
Nakada, Stephen Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, 1685 Highland Ave,3258 MFCB, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[7] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Hanover, NH USA
[8] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[9] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2017年 / 197卷 / 05期
关键词
kidney; nephrolithiasis; quality of life; surveys and questionnaires; patient reported outcome measures; KIDNEY-STONES; FORMERS; MORTALITY; DISEASE; SF-36;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.097
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: WISQOL (Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire) is a disease specific, health related quality of life measure designed for patients who form kidney stones. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the external and convergent validity of WISQOL and assess its psychometric properties. Materials and Methods: At the WISQOL creation site (development sample) and at 8 geographically diverse centers in the United States and Canada (consortium sample) patients with a history of kidney stones were recruited. Item response option variability, correlation patterns and internal consistency were compared between samples. Convergent validity was assessed by patients who completed both WISQOL and SF-36v2 (R) (36-Item Short Form Health Survey, version 2). Results: Results were analyzed in 1,609 patients, including 275 in the development sample and 1,334 in the consortium sample. Response option variability patterns of all items were acceptable. Internal WISQOL consistency was acceptable. Intersample score comparisons revealed few differences. For both samples the domain-total WISQOL score correlations exceeded 0.86. Item level analyses demonstrated suitable variation, allowing for discriminatory scoring. At the time that they completed WISQOL, patients with stones and stone related symptoms scored lowest for health related quality of life. Patients with stones but no symptoms and those with no stones scored higher. The convergent validity substudy confirmed the ability of WISQOL to identify stone specific decrements in health related quality of life that were not identified on SF-36v2. Conclusions: WISQOL is internally consistent and discriminates among patients with different stone statuses and symptoms. WISQOL is externally valid across the North American population. It may be used for multicenter health related quality of life studies in kidney stone disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1288
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation, reliability, and responsiveness of Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Brazilian population
    Scarlato, Andrea
    Cunha Souza, Carolina Chaves
    Machado Fonseca, Eliana Suelotto
    Ferreira Sartori, Marair Gracio
    Batista de Castello Girao, Manoel Joao
    Castro, Rodrigo Aquino
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (06) : 751 - 755
  • [42] Cystine Stone Formers Have Impaired Health-Related Quality of Life Compared with Noncystine Stone Formers: A Case-Referent Study Piloting the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire Among Patients with Cystine Stones
    Streeper, Necole M.
    Wertheim, Margaret L.
    Nakada, Stephen Y.
    Penniston, Kristina L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 : S48 - S53
  • [43] COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT ON QUALITY OF LIFE BETWEEN STANDARD PCNL AND TUBELESS PCNL AT DISCHARGE USING THE WISCONSIN STONE QOL QUESTIONNAIRE.
    Wei, Chao
    Zhang, Yucong
    Pokhrel, Gaurab
    Gan, Jiahua
    Liu, Xiaming
    Ye, Zhangqun
    Wang, Shaogang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E749 - E750
  • [44] Validation of online Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Khusial, Rishi J.
    Honkoop, Persijn J.
    van der Meer, Victor
    Snoeck-Stroband, Jiska B.
    Sont, Jacob K.
    [J]. ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [45] Reliability and validity of the sexual life quality questionnaire (SLQQ)
    Jean M.B. Woodward
    Steven L. Hass
    Paul J. Woodward
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2002, 11 : 365 - 377
  • [46] Reliability and validity of a German asthma quality of life questionnaire
    Miedinger, D
    Chhajed, PN
    Stolz, D
    Leimenstoll, B
    Tamm, M
    Fiechter, R
    Marks, GB
    Leuppi, JD
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2006, 136 (5-6) : 89 - 95
  • [47] Reliability of the asthma quality of life questionnaire in the Republic of Kazakhstan
    Ispayeva, Z.
    Bekmagambetova, R.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2023, 78
  • [48] Reliability and validity of the sexual life quality questionnaire (SLQQ)
    Woodward, JMB
    Hass, SL
    Woodward, PJ
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (04) : 365 - 377
  • [49] Validity and reliability of the Persian epilepsy quality of life questionnaire
    Ghaem, Haleh
    Borhani-Haghighi, Afshin
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCES, 2010, 15 (04) : 249 - 253
  • [50] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SPECIFIC HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR HALITOSIS: THE HALITOSIS QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE (HQLQ)
    Taieb, C.
    Maso, H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (03) : A63 - A63