On Responsibility Sensitive Safety in Car-following Situations - A Parameter Analysis on German Highways

被引:9
|
作者
Naumann, Maximilian [1 ,2 ]
Wirth, Florian [3 ]
Oboril, Fabian [4 ]
Scholl, Kay-Ulrich [4 ]
Elli, Maria Soledad [4 ]
Alvarez, Ignacio [4 ]
Weast, Jack [4 ]
Stiller, Christoph [3 ]
机构
[1] KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Bosch Ctr Artificial Intelligence, Renningen, Germany
[3] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Measurement & Control Syst, Karlsruhe, Germany
[4] Intel Corp, Santa Clara, CA 95051 USA
关键词
Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS); Automated Driving (AD); Safety Verification; Parameter Analysis;
D O I
10.1109/IV48863.2021.9575420
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The need for safety in automated driving is undisputed. Since automated vehicles are expected to reduce the number of fatalities in road traffic significantly, hundreds of millions of test kilometers would be required for statistical safety validation In Physics-based safety verification approaches are promising in order to reduce this validation effort. Towards this goal, Mobileye introduced the concept of Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS). In RSS, bounds for the reasonable worst-case behavior of traffic participants are assumed to be given, such as the reaction time or the maximum deceleration. These parameters have a crucial effect on the applicability of the approach: choosing conservative parameters likely hinders traffic flow, while the opposite could lead to collisions, as the assumptions are violated. Thus, in this work, we focus on finding reasonable parameters of RSS. Based on the physical limits, legal requirements and human driving behavior, we propose scopes and parameter sets that allow for a sound safety verification while not hindering traffic flow. Furthermore, we present an approach that explains seemingly frequent human drivers' RSS violations on highways and may lead to a useful extension of RSS.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of fuzzy systems in the car-following behaviour analysis
    Zheng, PJ
    McDonald, M
    [J]. FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3613 : 782 - 791
  • [32] Analysis of a Car-Following Model with Driver Memory Effect
    Xin, Zhi
    Xu, Jian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIFURCATION AND CHAOS, 2015, 25 (04):
  • [33] Experimental analysis of car-following dynamics and traffic stability
    Ranjitkar, P
    Nakatsuji, T
    Kawamura, A
    [J]. TRAFFIC FLOW THEORY 2005, 2005, (1934): : 22 - 32
  • [34] Comparative Analysis of Car-Following Models for Emissions Estimation
    Song, Guohua
    Yu, Lei
    Xu, Long
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2013, (2341) : 12 - 22
  • [35] Stability analysis of a general nonlinear car-following model
    Du, Wenju
    Li, Yinzhen
    Zhang, Jiangang
    Yu, Jianning
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2020, 93 (06) : 1461 - 1469
  • [36] Analysis of car-following model with cascade compensation strategy
    Zhu, Wen-Xing
    Zhang, Li-Dong
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2016, 449 : 265 - 274
  • [37] A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICALLY DERIVED CAR-FOLLOWING MODELS
    ROCKWELL, TH
    ERNST, RL
    HANKEN, A
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 1968, 2 (04): : 363 - &
  • [38] A Comparison Analysis of Surrogate Safety Measures with Car-Following Perspectives for Advanced Driver Assistance System
    Tak, Sehyun
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Lee, Donghoun
    Yeo, Hwasoo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2018,
  • [39] Stability Analysis of Stochastic Linear Car-Following Models
    Wang, Yu
    Li, Xiaopeng
    Tian, Junfang
    Jiang, Rui
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 54 (01) : 274 - 297
  • [40] ANALYSIS OF CAR-FOLLOWING BEHAVIOR UNDER CONGESTED CONDITIONS
    DONATI, F
    LARGONI, A
    [J]. ELETTROTECNICA, 1976, 63 (08): : 742 - 742